Introduction: Since 2009, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) has had the authority to regulate the manufacture, distribution, and marketing of tobacco products in order to reduce the death and disease caused by tobacco use. Biomarkers could play an important role across a number of FDA regulatory activities, including assessing new and modified risk tobacco products and identifying and evaluating potential product standards. Methods: On April 4-5, 2016, FDA/CTP hosted a public workshop focused on biomarkers of potential harm (BOPH) with participants from government, industry, academia, and other organizations. The workshop was divided into five sessions focused on: (1) overview of BOPH; (2) cardiovascular disease (CVD); (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); (4) cancer; and (5) new areas of research. Results and Conclusions: The deliberations from the workshop noted some promising BOPH but also highlighted the lack of systematic effort to identify BOPH that would have utility and validity for evaluating tobacco products. Research areas that could further strengthen the applicability of BOPH to tobacco regulatory science include the exploration of composite biomarkers as predictors of disease risk, "omics" biomarkers, and examining biomarkers using existing cohorts, surveys, and experimental studies. Implications: This paper synthesizes the main findings from the 2016 FDA-sponsored workshop focused on BOPH and highlights research areas that could further strengthen the science around BOPH and their applicability to tobacco regulatory science.
Introduction: Since 2009, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) has had the authority to regulate the manufacture, distribution, and marketing of tobacco products in order to reduce the death and disease caused by tobacco use. Biomarkers could play an important role across a number of FDA regulatory activities, including assessing new and modified risk tobacco products and identifying and evaluating potential product standards. Methods: On April 4-5, 2016, FDA/CTP hosted a public workshop focused on biomarkers of potential harm (BOPH) with participants from government, industry, academia, and other organizations. The workshop was divided into five sessions focused on: (1) overview of BOPH; (2) cardiovascular disease (CVD); (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); (4) cancer; and (5) new areas of research. Results and Conclusions: The deliberations from the workshop noted some promising BOPH but also highlighted the lack of systematic effort to identify BOPH that would have utility and validity for evaluating tobacco products. Research areas that could further strengthen the applicability of BOPH to tobacco regulatory science include the exploration of composite biomarkers as predictors of disease risk, "omics" biomarkers, and examining biomarkers using existing cohorts, surveys, and experimental studies. Implications: This paper synthesizes the main findings from the 2016 FDA-sponsored workshop focused on BOPH and highlights research areas that could further strengthen the science around BOPH and their applicability to tobacco regulatory science.
Authors: Dana M Carroll; Sharon E Murphy; Neal L Benowitz; Andrew A Strasser; Michael Kotlyar; Stephen S Hecht; Steve G Carmella; Francis J McClernon; Lauren R Pacek; Sarah S Dermody; Ryan G Vandrey; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: David Azzopardi; Linsey Ellen Haswell; Justin Frosina; Michael McEwan; Nathan Gale; Jesse Thissen; Filimon Meichanetzidis; George Hardie Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-10-06
Authors: Melissa Mercincavage; Benjamin Albelda; Darren Mays; Valentina Souprountchouk; Daniel P Giovenco; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Andrew A Strasser Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Joanne T Chang; Juan C Vivar; Jamie Tam; Hoda T Hammad; Carol H Christensen; Dana M van Bemmel; Babita Das; Uliana Danilenko; Cindy M Chang Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Steven G Carmella; Alisa K Heskin; Mei Kuen Tang; Joni Jensen; Xianghua Luo; Chap T Le; Sharon E Murphy; Neal L Benowitz; F Joseph McClernon; Ryan Vandrey; Sharon S Allen; Rachel Denlinger-Apte; Paul M Cinciripini; Andrew A Strasser; Mustafa al'Absi; Jason D Robinson; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph P McElroy; Steven G Carmella; Alisa K Heskin; Mei Kuen Tang; Sharon E Murphy; Sarah A Reisinger; Joni A Jensen; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht; Peter G Shields Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Matthew J Mazzella; John T Doucette; Ashley L Merianos; Lara Stone; Chase A Wullenweber; Stefanie A Busgang; Georg E Matt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nathan Gale; Michael McEwan; Oscar M Camacho; George Hardie; Christopher J Proctor; James Murphy Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.397