Literature DB >> 29252079

eHealth in Wound Care: from conception to implementation.

Zena Moore1, Donna Angel2, Julie Bjerregaard3, Tom O'Connor4, William McGuiness5, Knut Kröger6, Benjamin Schnack Brandt Rasmussen7, Knud Bonnet Yderstrœde8.   

Abstract

Executive summary Purpose This document aims to provide wound care clinicians with a rapid and structured overview of the key issues related to use of eHealth applications (telemedicine and telehealth) within wound care. This includes: An overview of terminology and available literature Guidance on the methodology for evaluation of eHealth solutions An introduction to and discussion of the potential benefits of eHealth technologies in wound care, and the possible barriers to their implementation Recommendations for ensuring a good implementation process and supporting involvement of wound care professionals in safeguarding that eHealth solutions meet the needs of the patients. Methodology The document sections lean on the structure and focus areas of the Model for ASsessment of Telemedicine (MAST) which defines crucial items to evaluate an eHealth application. The content of the document is developed on the basis of a literature review, identifying available documentation for use of eHealth solutions in wound care. Furthermore, it draws on various key documents recently published on the general development, evaluation and implementation of eHealth solutions. These include valuable up-to-date information relevant for any group of clinicians wishing to follow and influence the way eHealth solutions are integrated into clinical practice. Findings and conclusions The literature review revealed that the amount and level of evidence for use of eHealth applications in wound care is still limited. Some MAST domains are not examined in any of the available studies. Thus, more research is required to identify the potential benefits and harms to patients, and the possible challenges related to implementation of eHealth solutions in wound care. Potential barriers and facilitators for the implementation of eHealth applications into wound care practice are identified in the document, and these may all either enhance or impede the process. However, the available research does demonstrate patient satisfaction, improved access to health services for all client cohorts, and increased job satisfaction for clinicians. The document recommends that wound management clinicians, considering the use of eHealth applications in their clinical practice, consult widely and conduct regular evaluation of the outcomes to ensure efficient implementation of these services. To support this approach, steps to ensure a good implementation process within a given organisation have been proposed. These are synthesised into a three circle model.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 29252079     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup5.S1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  4 in total

Review 1.  Modified telehealth for care of chronic wounds during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A rapid literature review of alternative care modalities.

Authors:  Carla M Bondini; Sarah Sage; Brent P Wilson; Maire R Hall; Elizabeth A R Wallis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Telemedicine in Chronic Wound Management: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Lihui Cheng; Wei Gao; Dawei Chen; Chun Wang; Xingwu Ran
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Still engaged - healthcare staff's engagement when introducing a new eHealth solution for wound management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cecilia Fagerström; Hanna Wickström; Hanna Tuvesson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Reshaping wound care: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence app to improve wound assessment and management amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Aaron Jones; Mitch Burger; Thomas Leong; Astrid Frotjold; Sue Randall; Bora Kim; Judith Fethney; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.099

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.