Literature DB >> 29251976

Preliminary validity of the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire in predicting the reinforcing effects of cigarettes that vary in nicotine content.

Christopher A Arger1, Sarah H Heil1, Stacey C Sigmon1, Jennifer W Tidey2, Maxine L Stitzer3, Diann E Gaalema1, Hanna J Durand1, Janice Y Bunn1, Elizabeth K Ruggieri1, Stephen T Higgins1.   

Abstract

Validity studies evaluating self-report measures in relation to behavioral preference of cigarettes varying in nicotine content are needed. The current study examined the relationship between ratings on the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ) and the relative reinforcing effects of Spectrum research cigarettes (15.8, 5.2, 2.4, 0.4 mg per gram of tobacco). Data for this secondary analysis were obtained from a double-blind study (Higgins et al., 2017) evaluating the subjective and reinforcing effects of Spectrum cigarettes under acute smoking abstinence. Current smokers (N = 26) were recruited from three vulnerable smoking populations (economically disadvantaged women of reproductive age, opioid-maintained individuals, individuals with affective disorders). In Phase 1 (five sessions), the mCEQ (Satisfaction, Psychological Reward, Enjoyment of Respiratory Tract Sensations, Craving Reduction, Aversion subscales) was administered following ad lib smoking of Spectrum cigarettes and subscale differences scores were calculated by subtracting ratings of the 15.8 mg/g cigarette from ratings of the reduced nicotine content cigarettes. In Phase 2 (six sessions), participants completed six 2-dose concurrent choice tests. The relationship between mCEQ subscale difference scores from Phase 1 and nicotine dose choice from Phase 2 was examined using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses of variance. Higher Satisfaction and lower Aversion subscale difference scores were associated with choosing the 15.8 mg/g cigarette more than the 5.2, 2.4, and 0.4 mg/g cigarettes. Scores on the other mCEQ subscales were not associated with nicotine choice. These results provide support for validity of the mCEQ Satisfaction and Aversion subscales predicting the relative reinforcing effects and abuse liability of varying nicotine content cigarettes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29251976      PMCID: PMC5737747          DOI: 10.1037/pha0000145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  23 in total

1.  Sensitivity of nicotine-containing and de-nicotinized cigarette consumption to alternative non-drug reinforcement: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  T A Shahan; W K Bickel; G J Badger; L A Giordano
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Rachel L Denlinger; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Ryan G Vandrey; Mustafa al'Absi; Steven G Carmella; Paul M Cinciripini; Sarah S Dermody; David J Drobes; Stephen S Hecht; Joni Jensen; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; F Joseph McClernon; Ivan D Montoya; Sharon E Murphy; Jason D Robinson; Maxine L Stitzer; Andrew A Strasser; Hilary Tindle; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Confirmatory factor analyses and reliability of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire.

Authors:  Joseph C Cappelleri; Andrew G Bushmakin; Christine L Baker; Elizabeth Merikle; Abayomi O Olufade; David G Gilbert
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Sensory and physiologic effects of menthol and non-menthol cigarettes with differing nicotine delivery.

Authors:  Wallace B Pickworth; Eric T Moolchan; Ivan Berlin; Ram Murty
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Human studies of the behavioral pharmacological determinants of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; S R Goldberg; R I Herning; D R Jasinski; S E Lukas; K Miyasato; R Nemeth-Coslett; W B Pickworth; J E Rose; A Sampson
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1986

6.  Dose-response effects of spectrum research cigarettes.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen J Heishman; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Rachel L Denlinger; Astia N Roper-Batker; Kristen M Mackowick; Joni Jensen; Sharon E Murphy; Brian F Thomas; Eric Donny
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Smoking without nicotine delivery decreases withdrawal in 12-hour abstinent smokers.

Authors:  M F Butschky; D Bailey; J E Henningfield; W B Pickworth
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Naltrexone reduces the relative reinforcing value of nicotine in a cigarette smoking choice paradigm.

Authors:  Margaret Rukstalis; Christopher Jepson; Andrew Strasser; Kevin G Lynch; Kenneth Perkins; Freda Patterson; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nicotine preference in smokers as a function of smoking abstinence.

Authors:  K A Perkins; J E Grobe; D Weiss; C Fonte; A Caggiula
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Impact of Exclusive Use of Very Low Nicotine Cigarettes on Compensatory Smoking: An Inpatient Crossover Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Matthew J Carpenter; Tracy T Smith; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Cassidy M White; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Lauren R Pacek; Víctor R De Jesús; Lanqing Wang; Clifford Watson; Benjamin C Blount; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Evaluating the utility of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire and cigarette purchase task for predicting acute relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes varying in nicotine content.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Jennifer W Tidey; Chris A Arger; Derek D Reed; Thomas Gallagher; John R Hughes; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Janice Y Bunn; Stacey C Sigmon; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  A review of tobacco regulatory science research on vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Marissa Palmer; Jennifer W Tidey; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Maria R Cooper; Nicolle M Krebs; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Joy L Hart; Cassandra A Stanton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Adolescent smokers' response to reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes: Acute effects on withdrawal symptoms and subjective evaluations.

Authors:  Rachel N Cassidy; Suzanne M Colby; Jennifer W Tidey; Kristina M Jackson; Patricia A Cioe; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Acute subjective sensory perceptions predict relative reinforcing effects of smoked nicotine.

Authors:  Joshua L Karelitz; Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.591

7.  Response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes among smokers with chronic health conditions.

Authors:  Joanna M Streck; Cecilia L Bergeria; Maria A Parker; Danielle R Davis; Michael DeSarno; Stacey C Sigmon; John R Hughes; Diann E Gaalema; Sarah H Heil; Jennifer W Tidey; Maxine L Stitzer; Matthew Rothman; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-15

8.  Exploring the role of the Ser9Gly (rs6280) Dopamine D3 receptor polymorphism in nicotine reinforcement and cue-elicited craving.

Authors:  Chidera C Chukwueke; William J Kowalczyk; Patricia Di Ciano; Marie Gendy; Richard Taylor; Stephen J Heishman; Bernard Le Foll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; Allison M Glasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  The Impact of Gradual and Immediate Nicotine Reduction on Subjective Cigarette Ratings.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Eric C Donny; Xianghua Luo; Alicia M Allen; Dana M Carroll; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Sarah S Dermody; Joseph S Koopmeiners; F Joseph McClernon; Lauren R Pacek; Ryan Vandrey; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.