Literature DB >> 29251352

Microfluidic platforms for the study of neuronal injury in vitro.

Anil B Shrirao1, Frank H Kung2, Anton Omelchenko2, Rene S Schloss1, Nada N Boustany1, Jeffrey D Zahn1, Martin L Yarmush1, Bonnie L Firestein2.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects 5.3 million people in the United States, and there are 12,500 new cases of spinal cord injury (SCI) every year. There is yet a significant need for in vitro models of TBI and SCI in order to understand the biological mechanisms underlying central nervous system (CNS) injury and to identify and test therapeutics to aid in recovery from neuronal injuries. While TBI or SCI studies have been aided with traditional in vivo and in vitro models, the innate limitations in specificity of injury, isolation of neuronal regions, and reproducibility of these models can decrease their usefulness in examining the neurobiology of injury. Microfluidic devices provide several advantages over traditional methods by allowing researchers to (1) examine the effect of injury on specific neural components, (2) fluidically isolate neuronal regions to examine specific effects on subcellular components, and (3) reproducibly create a variety of injuries to model TBI and SCI. These microfluidic devices are adaptable for modeling a wide range of injuries, and in this review, we will examine different methodologies and models recently utilized to examine neuronal injury. Specifically, we will examine vacuum-assisted axotomy, physical injury, chemical injury, and laser-based axotomy. Finally, we will discuss the benefits and downsides to each type of injury model and discuss how researchers can use these parameters to pick a particular microfluidic device to model CNS injury.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axotomy; chemical and physical neuronal injury; microfluidic neuronal culture; spinal cord injury; traumatic brain injury; vacuum-assisted and laser-based neuronal injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29251352      PMCID: PMC5831486          DOI: 10.1002/bit.26519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  62 in total

Review 1.  Integrated microfluidics platforms for investigating injury and regeneration of CNS axons.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Kim; Jeong Won Park; Jae Hwan Byun; Behrad Vahidi; Seog Woo Rhee; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing adapter inducing interferon-β mediates microglial phagocytosis of degenerating axons.

Authors:  Suneil Hosmane; Million Adane Tegenge; Labchan Rajbhandari; Prech Uapinyoying; Nishant Ganesh Kumar; Nitish Thakor; Arun Venkatesan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport.

Authors:  Anne M Taylor; Mathew Blurton-Jones; Seog Woo Rhee; David H Cribbs; Carl W Cotman; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  In vitro and in situ visualization of cytoskeletal deformation under load: traumatic axonal injury.

Authors:  Adam J Fournier; Labchan Rajbhandari; Shiva Shrestha; Arun Venkatesan; K T Ramesh
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Local control of neurite development by nerve growth factor.

Authors:  R B Campenot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Axonal shortening and the mechanisms of axonal motility.

Authors:  E B George; B F Schneider; R J Lasek; M J Katz
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1988

7.  A Versatile Method of Patterning Proteins and Cells.

Authors:  Anil B Shrirao; Frank H Kung; Derek Yip; Bonnie L Firestein; Cheul H Cho; Ellen Townes-Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Microfluidic culture platform for studying neuronal response to mild to very mild axonal stretch injury.

Authors:  Yiing C Yap; Tracey C Dickson; Anna E King; Michael C Breadmore; Rosanne M Guijt
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Microfluidic tools for cell biological research.

Authors:  Guilhem Velve-Casquillas; Maël Le Berre; Matthieu Piel; Phong T Tran
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 20.722

10.  Spinal cord injury models: a review.

Authors:  T Cheriyan; D J Ryan; J H Weinreb; J Cheriyan; J C Paul; V Lafage; T Kirsch; T J Errico
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.772

View more
  11 in total

1.  A Microfluidic Culture Platform to Assess Axon Degeneration.

Authors:  Yu Yong; Christopher Hughes; Christopher Deppmann
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

2.  Tissue Models for Neurogenesis and Repair in 3D.

Authors:  Jonathan M Grasman; Julia A Ferreira; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 18.808

3.  Microfluidic flow cytometry: The role of microfabrication methodologies, performance and functional specification.

Authors:  Anil B Shrirao; Zachary Fritz; Eric M Novik; Gabriel M Yarmush; Rene S Schloss; Jeffrey D Zahn; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 4.  Microfluidics for Neuronal Cell and Circuit Engineering.

Authors:  Rouhollah Habibey; Jesús Eduardo Rojo Arias; Johannes Striebel; Volker Busskamp
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 5.  Modeling Neurodegenerative Diseases Using In Vitro Compartmentalized Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Louise Miny; Benoît G C Maisonneuve; Isabelle Quadrio; Thibault Honegger
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-24

6.  Current advances in in vitro models of central nervous system trauma.

Authors:  Anton Omelchenko; Nisha K Singh; Bonnie L Firestein
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  Current ex Vivo and in Vitro Approaches to Uncovering Mechanisms of Neurological Dysfunction after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kelly Andrew Hamilton; Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 8.  In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier-Integrated Neurological Disorder Models Using a Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Jin-Ha Choi; Mallesh Santhosh; Jeong-Woo Choi
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Recent progress in translational engineered in vitro models of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Polyxeni Nikolakopoulou; Rossana Rauti; Dimitrios Voulgaris; Iftach Shlomy; Ben M Maoz; Anna Herland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  A Brief Review of In Vitro Models for Injury and Regeneration in the Peripheral Nervous System.

Authors:  Parvathi Varier; Gayathri Raju; Pallavi Madhusudanan; Chinnu Jerard; Sahadev A Shankarappa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.