Literature DB >> 29250913

Brain responses to stimuli mimicking dental treatment among non-phobic individuals: A meta-analysis.

Awk Yeung1, T K Goto2, W K Leung3.   

Abstract

Numerous neuroimaging studies have attempted to identify how the brain responds to stimuli mimicking dental treatment in normal non-phobic individuals. However, results were sometimes inconsistent due to small sample sizes and methodological variations. This meta-analysis employs standardized procedures to summarize data from previous studies to identify brain regions that were consistently activated across studies, elicited by stimuli such as pictures, sounds, or audiovisual footage mimicking those encountered during dental treatments. A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus. The meta-analysis analyzed data from 120 healthy subjects from seven neuroimaging studies. We assessed the risk of bias among the included studies with the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. One study appeared to have a high risk of selection bias, whereas the others were considered to have a low risk of bias. Results revealed three clusters of activation with cluster sizes ranging from 768 mm3 to 1,424 mm3 . Stimuli mimicking dental treatment consistently activated the bilateral anterior insula; right dorsal anterior cingulate, putamen, and medial prefrontal cortex; and left claustrum. This study confirmed that audio and/or visual stimuli mimicking dental treatment consistently activated the fear-related brain regions among healthy subjects, mostly consistent with activations from general anxiety but without the involvement of the amygdala.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental anxiety; dental equipment; emotions; functional neuroimaging; limbic lobe; neurosciences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29250913     DOI: 10.1111/odi.12819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  3 in total

1.  An Updated Survey on Statistical Thresholding and Sample Size of fMRI Studies.

Authors:  Andy W K Yeung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.

Authors:  Andy W K Yeung; Tazuko K Goto; W Keung Leung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Magnification of fear and intention of avoidance in non-experienced versus experienced dental treatment in adults.

Authors:  Chia-Shu Lin; Chen-Yi Lee; Li-Ling Chen; Long-Ting Wu; Shue-Fen Yang; Tze-Fang Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.