Donna Collins-McMillen1, Felicia D Goodrum1,2. 1. BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 2. Department of Immunobiology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Herpesvirus latency has been viewed as a binary state where replication is either on or off. During latency, gene expression is thought to be restricted to non-coding RNAs or very few proteins so that the virus avoids detection by the immune system. However, a number of recent studies across herpesvirus families call into question the existence of a binary switch for latency, and suggest that latency is far more dynamic than originally presumed. These studies are the focus of this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Highly sensitive and global approaches to investigate viral gene expression in the context of latency have revealed low level viral transcripts, and in some cases protein, from each of the three kinetic gene classes during the latent alpha and beta herpesvirus infection either in vitro or in vivo. Further, low level, asymptomatic virus shedding persists following acute infection. Together, these findings have raised questions about how silent the latent infection truly is. SUMMARY: Emerging evidence suggests that viral gene expression associated with latent states may be broader and more dynamic than originally presumed during herpesvirus latency. This is an important possibility to consider in understanding the molecular programs associated with the establishment, maintenance and reactivation of herpesvirus latency. Here, we review these findings and detail how they contribute to the emergence of a biphasic model of reactivation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Herpesvirus latency has been viewed as a binary state where replication is either on or off. During latency, gene expression is thought to be restricted to non-coding RNAs or very few proteins so that the virus avoids detection by the immune system. However, a number of recent studies across herpesvirus families call into question the existence of a binary switch for latency, and suggest that latency is far more dynamic than originally presumed. These studies are the focus of this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Highly sensitive and global approaches to investigate viral gene expression in the context of latency have revealed low level viral transcripts, and in some cases protein, from each of the three kinetic gene classes during the latent alpha and beta herpesvirus infection either in vitro or in vivo. Further, low level, asymptomatic virus shedding persists following acute infection. Together, these findings have raised questions about how silent the latent infection truly is. SUMMARY: Emerging evidence suggests that viral gene expression associated with latent states may be broader and more dynamic than originally presumed during herpesvirus latency. This is an important possibility to consider in understanding the molecular programs associated with the establishment, maintenance and reactivation of herpesvirus latency. Here, we review these findings and detail how they contribute to the emergence of a biphasic model of reactivation.
Authors: Mariko Kobayashi; Ju-Youn Kim; Vladimir Camarena; Pamela C Roehm; Moses V Chao; Angus C Wilson; Ian Mohr Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: João T Proença; Heather M Coleman; Michael P Nicoll; Viv Connor; Christopher M Preston; Jane Arthur; Stacey Efstathiou Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Katie Caviness; Farah Bughio; Lindsey B Crawford; Daniel N Streblow; Jay A Nelson; Patrizia Caposio; Felicia Goodrum Journal: mBio Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Marion Griessl; Angelique Renzaho; Kirsten Freitag; Christof K Seckert; Matthias J Reddehase; Niels A W Lemmermann Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Byeong-Jae Lee; Chan-Ki Min; Meaghan Hancock; Daniel N Streblow; Patrizia Caposio; Felicia D Goodrum; Andrew D Yurochko Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 5.640