Literature DB >> 29250280

Time to Revisit the Time in the Therapeutic Range.

James A Reiffel1.   

Abstract

In recent clinical trials, the "quality" of warfarin management has been characterized by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) -- with the therapeutic range being an INR between 2.0 and 3.0. In many reviews of recent clinical trials, differences in the TTR have been used comparatively to critique and contrast the trials. However, TTR is a more complex measurement than is commonly appreciated, and many factors that underlie the TTR calculation, which can differ from trial to trial, have not been adequately addressed. This manuscript attempts to explain these issues so as to help the reader understand the factors that contribute to TTR and to understand the limitations of TTR so as to better understand anticoagulation trial results. It also addresses the issue of INRs below or above the therapeutic range, that can differ among trials, that are not provided simply by presenting a TTR value, but that can in a substantial way affect the bleeding risk and embolism-prevention likelihood of anticoagulation in a trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TTR; Therapeutic Range; Time in the Therapeutic Range

Year:  2017        PMID: 29250280      PMCID: PMC5673396          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  12 in total

1.  An important indirect drug interaction between dronedarone and warfarin that may be extrapolated to other drugs that can alter gastrointestinal function.

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism: a decade of progress in stroke prevention.

Authors:  R G Hart; J L Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-11-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; John J V McMurray; Renato D Lopes; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Jack Ansell; Dan Atar; Alvaro Avezum; M Cecilia Bahit; Rafael Diaz; J Donald Easton; Justin A Ezekowitz; Greg Flaker; David Garcia; Margarida Geraldes; Bernard J Gersh; Sergey Golitsyn; Shinya Goto; Antonio G Hermosillo; Stefan H Hohnloser; John Horowitz; Puneet Mohan; Petr Jansky; Basil S Lewis; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Freek W A Verheugt; Jun Zhu; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  An analysis of the lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  E M Hylek; S J Skates; M A Sheehan; D E Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Assessment of therapeutic control of anticoagulation.

Authors:  A Copplestone; S Roath
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.195

6.  Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range.

Authors:  L Schmitt; J Speckman; J Ansell
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Optimal INR for prevention of stroke and death in atrial fibrillation: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Anders Odén; Martin Fahlén; Robert G Hart
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 9.  Determinants and measures of quality in oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Scott Kaatz
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Impact of global geographic region on time in therapeutic range on warfarin anticoagulant therapy: data from the ROCKET AF clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel E Singer; Anne S Hellkamp; Jonathan P Piccini; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Guohua Pan; Jonathan L Halperin; Richard C Becker; Günter Breithardt; Graeme J Hankey; Werner Hacke; Christopher C Nessel; Manesh R Patel; Robert M Califf; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  4 in total

1.  Warfarin Monitoring in Safety-Net Health Systems: Analysis by Race/Ethnicity and Language Preference.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Elaine C Khoong; Natalie Rivadeneira; Maribel Sierra; Margaret C Fang; Neha Gupta; Rajiv Pramanik; Helen Tran; Tyler Whitezell; Valy Fontil; Shin-Yu Lee; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  TTR: Time in Therapeutic Range or "The Troublesome Report"?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-01-15

3.  Performance of the LumiraDx Platform INR Test in an Anticoagulation Clinic Point-of-Care Setting Compared With an Established Laboratory Reference Method.

Authors:  Robert Campbell Tait; Annielle Hung; Roy S Gardner
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Remote Warfarin Management Model Using a Smartphone Application (Yixing) in Improving Patients' Knowledge and Outcomes of Anticoagulation Therapy.

Authors:  Shudan Jiang; Qiuyi He; Jiajia Yan; Liyan Zhao; Yifan Zheng; Pan Chen; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.810

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.