Literature DB >> 29250267

Defibrillation Testing During ICD Implantation - Should we or Should we Not?

Justin Hayase1, Noel G Boyle1.   

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is an established therapy for improving mortality for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Whether to perform defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) either intraoperatively or post-operatively remains a controversial issue. The DFT is defined as the minimum energy required at which two shocks can successfully terminate ventricular fibrillation and dates from the era of surgically implanted devices with epicardial patches. Typically, a safety margin of at least 10J is employed for device programming, though some trial data suggest that a margin of 5J could be just as effective. Various methods have been utilized to perform DFT testing, and no particular method has been shown to be superior to another [Figure 1]. Previously, guideline recommendations addressed the indications for ICD implantation but did not comment on DFT testing. Recent consensus statements now provide some guidance as to when it is appropriate to perform or not perform DFT testing in light of new trial data. This review will address some of the risk factors for having a higher DFT, impact of DFT testing on patient outcomes, and some of the risks and contraindications of DFT testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator; atrial fibrillation; defibrillation testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 29250267      PMCID: PMC5673383          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  32 in total

1.  Efficacy and temporal stability of reduced safety margins for ventricular defibrillation: primary results from the Low Energy Safety Study (LESS).

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Steven Higgins; Richard Klein; F Roosevelt Gilliam; Harry Kopelman; Scott Hessen; John Payne; S Adam Strickberger; David Breiter; Stephen Hahn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Authors:  John W Eikelboom; Stuart J Connolly; Martina Brueckmann; Christopher B Granger; Arie P Kappetein; Michael J Mack; Jon Blatchford; Kevin Devenny; Jeffrey Friedman; Kelly Guiver; Ruth Harper; Yasser Khder; Maximilian T Lobmeyer; Hugo Maas; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Maarten L Simoons; Frans Van de Werf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The top 10 reasons to avoid defibrillation threshold testing during ICD implantation.

Authors:  Sami Viskin; Raphael Rosso
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Impact of Renal Function on Outcomes With Edoxaban in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.

Authors:  Erin A Bohula; Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dabigatran 75 mg b.i.d. in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Judith Kooiman; Tom van der Hulle; Hugo Maas; Sabrina Wiebe; Stephan Formella; Andreas Clemens; Marjolijn van Buren; Martien Janssen; Ton J Rabelink; Menno V Huisman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; John J V McMurray; Renato D Lopes; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Jack Ansell; Dan Atar; Alvaro Avezum; M Cecilia Bahit; Rafael Diaz; J Donald Easton; Justin A Ezekowitz; Greg Flaker; David Garcia; Margarida Geraldes; Bernard J Gersh; Sergey Golitsyn; Shinya Goto; Antonio G Hermosillo; Stefan H Hohnloser; John Horowitz; Puneet Mohan; Petr Jansky; Basil S Lewis; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Freek W A Verheugt; Jun Zhu; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment.

Authors:  Keith A A Fox; Jonathan P Piccini; Daniel Wojdyla; Richard C Becker; Jonathan L Halperin; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Graeme J Hankey; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Manesh R Patel; Daniel E Singer; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Risk of stroke after catheter ablation versus cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched study of 24,244 patients.

Authors:  Peter A Noseworthy; Suraj Kapa; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Malini Madhavan; Holly Van Houten; Lindsey R Haas; Siva K Mulpuru; Christopher J McLeod; Samuel J Asirvatham; Paul A Friedman; Nilay D Shah; Douglas L Packer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with peripheral artery disease and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: insights from ROCKET AF.

Authors:  William Schuyler Jones; Anne S Hellkamp; Jonathan Halperin; Jonathan P Piccini; Gunter Breithardt; Daniel E Singer; Keith A A Fox; Graeme J Hankey; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Robert M Califf; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Dabigatran etexilate and risk of myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Fanny Buckinx; François Mullier; Valentine Minet; Véronique Rabenda; Jean-Yves Reginster; Philippe Hainaut; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Michel Dogné
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.