| Literature DB >> 29250254 |
Katy Lavoie1, Marie-Hélène Turgeon2, Caroline Brais3, Josiane Larochelle4, Lucie Blais5,6, Paul Farand1,7, Geneviève Letemplier1,7, Sylvie Perreault5, Marie-France Beauchesne1,5,7,8.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiovascular disease for which newer oral anticoagulants are available. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness in prescriptions of direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs), more specifically apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban. This was a singlecentre, retrospective study conducted in the province of Quebec, Canada. Adult subjects hospitalized between October 2011 and October 2014, with a diagnosis of AF, and a DOAC prescription were included. Data were retrieved from the electronic medical records and prescriptions were evaluated according to appropriateness criteria. A total of 500 subjects were included (235 subjects on dabigatran,222 on rivaroxaban and 43 on apixaban). Overall, 70.4% (95% confidence interval [Cl] 66.4-74.1) of DOAC prescriptions were considered appropriate. About 24% of subjects received an inappropriate dose of apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban. A reduced dose was prescribed in 56.8% of subjects with no clearindication, and 43.2% received a dose that was not reduced while indicated. DOACs were frequentlyprescribed at a dose that was considered inappropriate. There is a need to strengthen dosing recommendations of DOACs in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; apixaban; dabigatran; direct oral anticoagulants; rivaroxaban
Year: 2016 PMID: 29250254 PMCID: PMC5673313 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Atr Fibrillation ISSN: 1941-6911