| Literature DB >> 29249933 |
Ana R de Oliveira1, Armindo de Arruda Campos Neto2, Paloma C Bezerra de Medeiros3, Michael J O de Andrade1, Natanael A Dos Santos1.
Abstract
Organic solvents can change CNS sensory and motor function. Eye-movement analyses can be important tools when investigating the neurotoxic changes that result from chronic organic solvent exposure. The current research measured the eye-movement patterns of men and women with and without histories of chronic organic solvent exposure. A total of 44 volunteers between 18 and 41 years old participated in this study; 22 were men (11 exposed and 11 controls), and 22 were women (11 exposed and 11 controls). Eye movement was evaluated using a 250-Hz High-Speed Video Eye Tracker Toolbox (Cambridge Research Systems) via an image of a maze. Specific body indices of exposed and non-exposed men and women were measured with an Inbody 720 to determine whether the differences in eye-movement patterns were associated with body composition. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0.0. The results indicated that exposed adults showed significantly more fixations (t = 3.82; p = 0.001; r = 0.51) and longer fixations (t = 4.27; p = 0.001, r = 0.54) than their non-exposed counterparts. Comparisons within men (e.g., exposed and non-exposed) showed significant differences in the number of fixations (t = 2.21; p = 0.04; r = 0.20) and duration of fixations (t = 3.29; p = 0.001; r = 0.35). The same was true for exposed vs. non-exposed women, who showed significant differences in the number of fixations (t = 3.10; p = 0.001; r = 0.32) and fixation durations (t = 2.76; p = 0.01; r = 0.28). However, the results did not show significant differences between exposed women and men in the number and duration of fixations. No correlations were found between eye-movement pattern and body composition measures (p > 0.05). These results suggest that chronic organic solvent exposure affects eye movements, regardless of sex and body composition, and that eye tracking contributes to the investigation of the visual information processing disorders acquired by workers exposed to organic solvents.Entities:
Keywords: eye movement; neurotoxicity; organic solvents; sexes; visual processing
Year: 2017 PMID: 29249933 PMCID: PMC5714886 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1The VMT used in the eye-movement tracking task. The maze is a rectangle with a central starting point (point A) and four destination points (point B) at each of the four corners. Starting point A connects each of the four paths via independent dotted lines. Two paths exist: Type I and Type II (i.e., the upper left corner route is similar to the lower right corner route, and the lower left corner route is similar to the upper right corner route).
Sociodemographic data of the EMG, MCG, EFG, and FCG.
| Age (years) | 30.18 | 6.48 | 26.91 | 5.86 | 26.73 | 6.50 | 26.55 | 6.50 |
| Education (years) | 9.73 | 2.10 | 10.36 | 0.92 | 9.73 | 1.85 | 10.45 | 1.51 |
| Exposure time (years) | 6.53 | 4.38 | 4.70 | 3.53 | ||||
Exposed male group.
Exposed female group.
Male control group.
Female control group.
SD, standard deviation.
Individuals with no exposure history.
Occupational activities and number of participants in the MCG and FCG.
| Activity | Activity | ||
| Janitor | 6 | Janitor | 5 |
| General Services Assistant | 2 | Student | 3 |
| Student | 2 | General service assistant | 2 |
| Fiscal monitoring | 1 | Administrative assistant | 1 |
| Security guard | 1 | Day laborer | 1 |
| Total | 12 | Total | 12 |
Absolute frequency.
Male control group.
Female control group.
Figure 2Mean and standard errors of the number of fixations and duration of fixations (in milliseconds) of the Exposed male group (EMG), Exposed female group (EFG), Control male group (CMG) and Control female group (CFG).
The t-values, significance (p-value), and effect sizes associated with the comparisons of the mean number of fixations and duration of fixations between the tEG and tCG; EMG and EFG; EMG and CMG; and EFG and CFG.
| Fixations | tEG vs. tCG | 3.82 | 0.01 | 0.51 |
| EMG vs. CMG | 2.21 | 0.04 | 0.20 | |
| EFG vs. CFG | 3.10 | 0.01 | 0.32 | |
| EMG vs. EFG | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.03 | |
| Duration | tEG vs. tCG | 4.27 | 0.01 | 0.54 |
| EMG vs. CMG | 3.29 | 0.01 | 0.35 | |
| EFG vs. CFG | 2.76 | 0.01 | 0.28 | |
| EMG vs. EFG | 0.27 | 0.79 | 0.01 |
tEG, Total exposed group.
tCG, Total control group.
EMG, Exposed male group.
EFG, Exposed female group.
CMG, Control male group.
CFG, Control female group.
Significance, p < 0.005.
Figure 3Mean and standard errors of the body water (l), weight (kg), fat mass (kg), lean mass (kg), hip waist ratio (cm), visceral fat (cm2), of the Exposed male group (EMG), Exposed female group (EFG), Control male group (CMG), and Control female group (CFG).