Literature DB >> 29249913

New Strategies to Improve Polypectomy During Colonoscopy.

Michael B Wallace1.   

Abstract

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The most effective strategy for prevention of CRC is to screen for and remove precancerous polyps. There are various ways to screen for CRC. In the United States, the most common method is colonoscopy. Polyps are classified primarily through pathology. Size is the primary risk factor for malignancy. In general, the bigger the polyp, the greater the risk for malignancy. There are 3 basic options for removal: standard polypectomy; advanced resection techniques, known as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); and surgical removal. In the past 10 years, the use of surgical removal has significantly decreased. Noninvasive, nonmalignant polyps can be removed endoscopically. EMR and ESD are very effective and achieve similar clinical outcomes. Both procedures begin with a submucosal injection. The submucosal lift is one of the most significant advances that have been made in polypectomy. Traditionally, the approach to achieving a submucosal lift has relied on the use of a saline solution. Saline is inexpensive and widely available, but it dissipates quickly. Various viscous agents have been added to saline to maintain mucosal lifting throughout the procedure. Although most are effective, they are used off-label. The only solution approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the submucosal lift procedure is Eleview. In a clinical trial, Eleview decreased the mean total injected volume and the mean total injected volume per lesion as compared with saline. Other advances in polypectomy techniques include the use of cold snare polypectomy and high-definition colonoscopes. The quality of the colonoscopy can also be improved if a physician knows and monitors his or her adenoma detection rate.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29249913      PMCID: PMC5721691     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)        ISSN: 1554-7914


  35 in total

Review 1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Andreas Adler; Alireza Aminalai; Jens Aschenbeck; Rolf Drossel; Michael Mayr; Mathias Scheel; Andreas Schröder; Timur Yenerim; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ulrich Gauger; Stephanie Roll; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Methylene blue MMX tablets for chromoendoscopy. Safety tolerability and bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Repici; A F D Di Stefano; M M Radicioni; V Jas; L Moro; S Danese
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Susan G Coe; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974-2013.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Stacey A Fedewa; William F Anderson; Kimberly D Miller; Jiemin Ma; Philip S Rosenberg; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Submucosal injection solution for gastrointestinal tract endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Yutaka Saito; Kazuhide Yamamoto; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Cold snare piecemeal resection of colonic and duodenal polyps ≥1 cm.

Authors:  Neel Choksi; B Joseph Elmunzer; Ryan W Stidham; Dmitry Shuster; Cyrus Piraka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-06-24

Review 10.  Endoscopic Mucosal Resection versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: A Western Colonoscopist's View.

Authors:  Ian Holmes; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-08-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?

Authors:  Ji Hyun Song; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 2.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer Leading into a New Decade: The "Roaring '20s" for Epigenetic Biomarkers?

Authors:  Hélder Almeida-Lousada; André Mestre; Sara Ramalhete; Aryeh J Price; Ramon Andrade de Mello; Ana D Marreiros; Ricardo Pires das Neves; Pedro Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Endoscopic polypectomy devices.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nikhil A Kumta; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Manoop S Bhutani; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Kumar Krishnan; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Rahul Pannala; Mansour A Parsi; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-04-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.