Literature DB >> 29249566

Evaluation of MLC leaf transmission on IMRT treatment plan quality of patients with advanced lung cancer.

Jiayun Chen1, Guishan Fu1, Minghui Li1, Yixin Song1, Jianrong Dai2, Junjie Miao1, Zhiqiang Liu1, Yexiong Li1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of leaf treatment of multileaf collimator (MLC) in plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with advanced lung cancer. Five MLCs with different leaf transmissions (0.01%, 0.5%, 1.2%, 1.8%, and 3%) were configured for an accelerator in a treatment planning system. Correspondingly, 5 treatment plans with the same optimization setting were created and evaluated quantitatively for each patient (11 patients total) who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. All of the 5 plans for each patient met the dose requirement for the planning treatment volumes (PTVs) and had similar target dose homogeneity and conformity. On average, the doses to selected organs were as follows: (1) V5, V20, and the mean dose of total lung; (2) the maximum and mean dose to spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV); and (3) V30 and V40 of heart, decreased slightly when MLC transmission was decreased, but with no statistical differences. There is a clear grouping of plans having total quality score (SD) value, which is used to evaluate plan quality: (1) more than 1 (patient nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 8), and more than 2.5 (patient no. 6); (2) less than 1 (patient nos. 7 and 10); (3) around 1 (patient nos. 4, 9, and 11). As MLC transmission increased, overall SD values increased as well and plan dose requirement was harder to meet. The clinical requirements were violated increasingly as MLC transmission became large. Total SD with and without normal tissue (NT) showed similar results, with no statistically significant differences. Therefore, decrease of MLC transmission did have minimum impact on plan, and it improved target coverage and reduced normal tissue radiation slightly, with no statistical significance. Plan quality could not be significantly improved by MLC transmission reduction. However, lower MLC transmission may have advantages on lung sparing to low- and intermediate-dose exposure. Besides conventional fraction, hyperfraction, or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the reduction on lung sparing is still essential because it is highly relevant to radiation pneumonitis (RP). It has potential to diminish incidence of RP and improve patient's quality of life after irradiation with lowered MLC transmission.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; MLC transmission; lung sparing; plan quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29249566     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  4 in total

1.  Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Automatic Treatment Planning Study.

Authors:  Daquan Wang; Jiayun Chen; Xiaodong Zhang; Tao Zhang; Luhua Wang; Qinfu Feng; Zongmei Zhou; Jianrong Dai; Nan Bi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chengqiang Li; Jinhu Chen; Jian Zhu; Guanzhong Gong; Cheng Tao; Zhenjiang Li; Jie Lu; Yong Yin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  A Special Report on 2019 International Planning Competition and a Comprehensive Analysis of Its Results.

Authors:  Jiayun Chen; Jianrong Dai; Ahmad Nobah; Sen Bai; Nan Bi; Youqun Lai; Minghui Li; Yuan Tian; Xuetao Wang; Qi Fu; Bin Liang; Tao Zhang; Wenlong Xia; Yuan Xu; Wenting Ren; Xuena Yan; Ji Zhu; Deqi Chen; Jiming Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Jiayun Chen; Weijie Cui; Qi Fu; Haojia Zhang; Xiaodong Huang; Fei Han; Wenlong Xia; Bin Liang; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.