Literature DB >> 29248334

Diagnostic Accuracy of a New High-Sensitivity Troponin I Assay and Five Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Ruling Out Acute Myocardial Infarction and Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Jaimi H Greenslade1, Edward W Carlton2, Christopher Van Hise3, Elizabeth Cho3, Tracey Hawkins4, William A Parsonage5, Jillian Tate6, Jacobus Ungerer6, Louise Cullen5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This diagnostic accuracy study describes the performance of 5 accelerated chest pain pathways, calculated with the new Beckman's Access high-sensitivity troponin I assay.
METHODS: High-sensitivity troponin I was measured with presentation and 2-hour blood samples in 1,811 patients who presented to an emergency department (ED) in Australia. Patients were classified as being at low risk according to 5 rules: modified accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using troponin as the only biomarker (m-ADAPT), the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS) pathway, the History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) pathway, the No Objective Testing Rule, and the new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule. Endpoints were 30-day acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome. Measures of diagnostic accuracy for each rule were calculated.
RESULTS: Data included 96 patients (5.3%) with acute myocardial infarction and 139 (7.7%) with acute coronary syndrome. The new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule and No Objective Testing Rule had high sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2% to 100% for both) and acute coronary syndrome (98.6% [95% CI 94.9% to 99.8%] and 99.3% [95% CI 96.1% to 100%]). The m-ADAPT, EDACS, and HEART pathways also yielded high sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction (96.9% [95% CI 91.1% to 99.4%] for m-ADAPT and 97.9% [95% CI 92.7% to 99.7%] for EDACS and HEART), but lower sensitivity for acute coronary syndrome (≤95.0% for all). The m-ADAPT, EDACS, and HEART rules classified more patients as being at low risk (64.3%, 62.5%, and 49.8%, respectively) than the new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule and No Objective Testing Rule (28.2% and 34.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In this cohort with a low prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome, using the Beckman's Access high-sensitivity troponin I assay with the new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule or No Objective Testing Rule enabled approximately one third of patients to be safely discharged after 2-hour risk stratification with no further testing. The EDACS, m-ADAPT, or HEART pathway enabled half of ED patients to be rapidly referred for objective testing.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248334     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification.

Authors:  Jason Stopyra; Anna Catherine Snavely; Brian Hiestand; Brian J Wells; Kristin Macfarlane Lenoir; David Herrington; Nella Hendley; Nicklaus P Ashburn; Chadwick D Miller; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Unstable Angina and Acute Myocardial Infarction without ST-Segment Elevation - 2021.

Authors:  José Carlos Nicolau; Gilson Soares Feitosa Filho; João Luiz Petriz; Remo Holanda de Mendonça Furtado; Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Walmor Lemke; Renato Delascio Lopes; Ari Timerman; José A Marin Neto; Luiz Bezerra Neto; Bruno Ferraz de Oliveira Gomes; Eduardo Cavalcanti Lapa Santos; Leopoldo Soares Piegas; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Alexandre Jorge de Andrade Negri; Andre Franci; Brivaldo Markman Filho; Bruno Mendonça Baccaro; Carlos Eduardo Lucena Montenegro; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos José Dornas Gonçalves Barbosa; Cláudio Marcelo Bittencourt das Virgens; Edson Stefanini; Euler Roberto Fernandes Manenti; Felipe Gallego Lima; Francisco das Chagas Monteiro Júnior; Harry Correa Filho; Henrique Patrus Mundim Pena; Ibraim Masciarelli Francisco Pinto; João Luiz de Alencar Araripe Falcão; Joberto Pinheiro Sena; José Maria Peixoto; Juliana Ascenção de Souza; Leonardo Sara da Silva; Lilia Nigro Maia; Louis Nakayama Ohe; Luciano Moreira Baracioli; Luís Alberto de Oliveira Dallan; Luis Augusto Palma Dallan; Luiz Alberto Piva E Mattos; Luiz Carlos Bodanese; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Manoel Fernandes Canesin; Marcelo Bueno da Silva Rivas; Marcelo Franken; Marcos José Gomes Magalhães; Múcio Tavares de Oliveira Júnior; Nivaldo Menezes Filgueiras Filho; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Paulo Ernesto Leães; Paulo Roberto Ferreira Rossi; Paulo Rogério Soares; Pedro Alves Lemos Neto; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rafael Rebêlo C Cavalcanti; Renato Jorge Alves; Renato Abdala Karam Kalil; Roberto Esporcatte; Roberto Luiz Marino; Roberto Rocha Corrêa Veiga Giraldez; Romeu Sérgio Meneghelo; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Rui Fernando Ramos; Sandra Nivea Dos Reis Saraiva Falcão; Talia Falcão Dalçóquio; Viviana de Mello Guzzo Lemke; William Azem Chalela; Wilson Mathias Júnior
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.667

3.  Plasmonic ELISA for Sensitive Detection of Disease Biomarkers with a Smart Phone-Based Reader.

Authors:  Quanli Yang; Ruitian Cai; Wei Xiao; Zengfeng Wu; Xia Liu; Yan Xu; Miaomiao Xu; Hui Zhong; Guodong Sun; Qihui Liu; Qiangqiang Fu; Junjian Xiang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.703

4.  Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dustin G Mark; Jie Huang; Dustin W Ballard; Mamata V Kene; Dana R Sax; Uli K Chettipally; James S Lin; Sean C Bouvet; Dale M Cotton; Megan L Anderson; Ian D McLachlan; Laura E Simon; Judy Shan; Adina S Rauchwerger; David R Vinson; Mary E Reed
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  [Current characteristics of methods for determining cardiac troponins and their diagnostic value: a mini-review]

Authors:  Aleksey Chaulin
Journal:  Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Myocardial Infarction Can Be Safely Excluded by High-sensitivity Troponin I Testing 3 Hours After Emergency Department Presentation.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Robert Christenson; Deborah B Diercks; Christian Fromm; Gary F Headden; Christopher J Hogan; Erik B Kulstad; Frank LoVecchio; Richard M Nowak; Jon W Schrock; Adam J Singer; Alan B Storrow; Joely Straseski; Alan H B Wu; Daniel P Zelinski
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Baseline High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Level Below Limit of Quantitation Rules Out Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Bernard Cook; James McCord; Michael Hudson; Waleed Al-Darzi; Michele Moyer; Gordon Jacobsen; Richard Nowak
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 8.  Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nicklaus P Ashburn; James C O'Neill; Jason P Stopyra; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.