Literature DB >> 29248331

Evaluating the Usefulness of MP-3 Microperimetry in Glaucoma Patients.

Masato Matsuura1, Hiroshi Murata2, Yuri Fujino2, Kazunori Hirasawa3, Mieko Yanagisawa2, Ryo Asaoka4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the test-retest reproducibility and structure-function relationship of the MP-3 microperimeter, compared against the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA).
METHODS: Design: Reliability and validity study.
SETTING: Institutional, or clinical practice. STUDY POPULATION: Thirty eyes of 30 primary open-angle glaucoma patients were enrolled. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Visual fields (VF) were measured twice with the MP-3 and HFA instruments, using the 10-2 test grid pattern in both perimeters. Ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Test-retest reproducibility was assessed using the mean absolute deviation (MAD) measure at all 68 VF test points, and also the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the repeated VF sensitivities. The structure-function relationship between VF sensitivities (measured with MP-3 or HFA) and GCC thickness (adjusted for the retinal ganglion cell displacement) was analyzed using linear mixed modeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reproducibility and structure-function relationship.
RESULTS: The average measurement duration with the HFA 10-2 was 7 minutes and 6 seconds (7m06s) ± 0m49s (mean ± standard deviation). A significantly (P < .001, paired Wilcoxon test) longer measurement duration was observed for the MP-3 test: 10m29s ± 2m55s. There were no significant differences in MAD and ICC values between HFA (MAD; 0.83 ± 0.69 dB and ICC: 0.89 ± 0.69, mean ± standard deviation) and MP-3 (MAD: 0.65 ± 0.67 dB and ICC: 0.89 ± 0.69). MP-3 VF sensitivities had a stronger structure-function relationship with GCC thickness compared to HFA.
CONCLUSIONS: The MP-3 microperimeter has a similar test-retest reproducibility to the HFA but a better structure-function relationship.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248331     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  13 in total

1.  Association between peripheral visual field defects and focal lamina cribrosa defects in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Shiho Mochida; Takeshi Yoshida; Takuhei Nomura; Ryoma Hatake; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Author Response: Expected Improvement in Structure-Function Agreement With Macular Displacement Models.

Authors:  Janelle Tong; Jack Phu; David Alonso-Caneiro; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

Review 3.  Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Scuderi; Irene Gattazzo; Alessandro de Paula; Clemente Maria Iodice; Federico Di Tizio; Andrea Perdicchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on normal retinal function evaluated by microperimetry-3.

Authors:  Yue Qi; Zengyi Wang; Shi-Ming Li; Qisheng You; Xida Liang; Yanping Yu; Wu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Association between visual function and the integrity of residual ellipsoid zone in resolved central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Asahi Fujita; Yurika Aoyama; Saori Tsuneyoshi; Aya Sugiura; Keiko Azuma; Kimiko Asano-Shimizu; Hirotsugu Soga; Yohei Hashimoto; Ryo Asaoka; Tatsuya Inoue; Ryo Obata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The usefulness of the retinal sensitivity measurement with a microperimetry for predicting the visual prognosis of branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema.

Authors:  Ryosuke Fujino; Ryo Asaoka; Shuichiro Aoki; Aya Sugiura; Mari Kusakabe; Kimiko Asano-Shimizu; Yoko Nomura; Aya Aoki; Yohei Hashimoto; Keiko Azuma; Tatsuya Inoue; Ryo Obata
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Systematic and Random Mapping Errors in Structure - Function Analysis of the Macula.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Luca M Rossetti; Davide Allegrini; Mario R Romano; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Detecting Progression of Retinitis Pigmentosa Using the Binomial Pointwise Linear Regression Method.

Authors:  Shotaro Asano; Akio Oishi; Ryo Asaoka; Yuri Fujino; Hiroshi Murata; Keiko Azuma; Manabu Miyata; Ryo Obata; Tatsuya Inoue
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  The usefulness of the Deep Learning method of variational autoencoder to reduce measurement noise in glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Hiroshi Murata; Shotaro Asano; Masato Matsuura; Yuri Fujino; Atsuya Miki; Masaki Tanito; Shiro Mizoue; Kazuhiko Mori; Katsuyoshi Suzuki; Takehiro Yamashita; Kenji Kashiwagi; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids.

Authors:  Janelle Tong; David Alonso-Caneiro; Nayuta Yoshioka; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.