Jane L Givens1, Rebecca L Sudore2, Gad A Marshall3, Alyssa B Dufour4, Ilona Kopits5, Susan L Mitchell4. 1. Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: janegivens@hrca.harvard.edu. 2. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Division of Geriatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Little is known about advance care planning (ACP) among community-dwelling patients with dementia. OBJECTIVES: To describe aspects of ACP among patients with dementia and examine the association between ACP and health care proxy (HCP) acceptance of patients' illness. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational survey of 62 HCPs of patients with dementia (N = 14 mild, N = 48 moderate/severe), from seven outpatient geriatric and memory disorder clinics in Boston. Aspects of ACP included HCP's report of patients' preferences for level of future care, communication with HCP and physician regarding care preferences, and proxy preparedness for shared decision making. The association between ACP and HCP acceptance with patients' illness was examined using the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance subscale of the Cancer Experience Scale. RESULTS: Eleven percent of proxies believed that the patient would want life-prolonging treatment, 31% a time-limited trial of curative treatment, and 47% comfort-focused care. Thirty-one percent reported that the patient had communicated with their physician regarding preferences for care, and 77% had communicated with the HCP. Forty-four percent of HCPs wanted more discussion with the patient regarding care preferences. The HCP having discussed care preferences with the patient was associated with greater acceptance of the patient's illness (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our findings support need for greater ACP discussions between patients and proxies. Discussions regarding goals of care are likely to benefit patients through delivery of care congruent with their wishes and HCPs in terms of greater acceptance of patients' illness.
CONTEXT: Little is known about advance care planning (ACP) among community-dwelling patients with dementia. OBJECTIVES: To describe aspects of ACP among patients with dementia and examine the association between ACP and health care proxy (HCP) acceptance of patients' illness. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational survey of 62 HCPs of patients with dementia (N = 14 mild, N = 48 moderate/severe), from seven outpatient geriatric and memory disorder clinics in Boston. Aspects of ACP included HCP's report of patients' preferences for level of future care, communication with HCP and physician regarding care preferences, and proxy preparedness for shared decision making. The association between ACP and HCP acceptance with patients' illness was examined using the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance subscale of the Cancer Experience Scale. RESULTS: Eleven percent of proxies believed that the patient would want life-prolonging treatment, 31% a time-limited trial of curative treatment, and 47% comfort-focused care. Thirty-one percent reported that the patient had communicated with their physician regarding preferences for care, and 77% had communicated with the HCP. Forty-four percent of HCPs wanted more discussion with the patient regarding care preferences. The HCP having discussed care preferences with the patient was associated with greater acceptance of the patient's illness (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our findings support need for greater ACP discussions between patients and proxies. Discussions regarding goals of care are likely to benefit patients through delivery of care congruent with their wishes and HCPs in terms of greater acceptance of patients' illness.
Authors: Jennifer W Mack; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy Balboni; Robert J Friedlander; Susan D Block; Elizabeth Trice; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jenny T van der Steen; Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet; Meertje Hallie-Heierman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc Deliens; Marike E de Boer; Lieve Van den Block; Nicole van Uden; Cees M P M Hertogh; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Karen Harrison Dening; Michael King; Louise Jones; Victoria Vickerstaff; Elizabeth L Sampson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heather Ma; Rachel E Kiekhofer; Sarah M Hooper; Sarah Dulaney; Katherine L Possin; Winston Chiong Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Georges Naasan; Nicole D Boyd; Krista L Harrison; Sarah B Garrett; Talita D'Aguiar Rosa; Brenda Pérez-Cerpa; Shamiel McFarlane; Bruce L Miller; Christine S Ritchie Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2022-02
Authors: Adreanne Brungardt; Jessica Cassidy; Ashley LaRoche; Sarah Dulaney; R John Sawyer; Katherine L Possin; Hillary D Lum Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 2.090
Authors: Corinne Pettigrew; Rostislav Brichko; Betty Black; Maureen K O'Connor; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Maisha T Robinson; Allison Lindauer; Raj C Shah; Guerry M Peavy; Kayla Meyer; Frederick A Schmitt; Jennifer H Lingler; Kimiko Domoto-Reilly; Dorothy Farrar-Edwards; Marilyn Albert Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Noorhazlina Ali; Philomena Anthony; Wee Shiong Lim; Mei Sian Chong; Edward Wing Hong Poon; Vicki Drury; Mark Chan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cara L McDermott; Ruth A Engelberg; Nita Khandelwal; Jill M Steiner; Laura C Feemster; James Sibley; William B Lober; J Randall Curtis Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Krista L Harrison; Theresa A Allison; Sarah B Garrett; Nicole Thompson; Rebecca L Sudore; Christine S Ritchie Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jamie Bryant; Marcus Sellars; Amy Waller; Karen Detering; Craig Sinclair; Rasa Ruseckaite; Ben White; Linda Nolte Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 4.633