Literature DB >> 29247700

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings.

Jane Noyes1, Andrew Booth2, Kate Flemming3, Ruth Garside4, Angela Harden5, Simon Lewin6, Tomas Pantoja7, Karin Hannes8, Margaret Cargo9, James Thomas10.   

Abstract

The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group develops and publishes guidance on the synthesis of qualitative and mixed-method implementation evidence. Choice of appropriate methodologies, methods, and tools is essential when developing a rigorous protocol and conducting the synthesis. Cochrane authors who conduct qualitative evidence syntheses have thus far used a small number of relatively simple methods to address similarly written questions. Cochrane has invested in methodological work to develop new tools and to encourage the production of exemplar reviews to show the value of more innovative methods that address a wider range of questions. In this paper, in the series, we report updated guidance on the selection of tools to assess methodological limitations in qualitative studies and methods to extract and synthesize qualitative evidence. We recommend application of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews to assess confidence in qualitative synthesized findings. This guidance aims to support review authors to undertake a qualitative evidence synthesis that is intended to be integrated subsequently with the findings of one or more Cochrane reviews of the effects of similar interventions. The review of intervention effects may be undertaken concurrently with or separate to the qualitative evidence synthesis. We encourage further development through reflection and formal testing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cochrane; GRADE CERQual; Methodological limitations; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Qualitative research; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29247700     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  69 in total

1.  Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Nathan Bray; Niina Kolehmainen; Jennifer McAnuff; Louise Tanner; Lorna Tuersley; Fiona Beyer; Aimee Grayston; Dor Wilson; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Jane Noyes; Dawn Craig
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The effectiveness of ethno-specific and mainstream health services: an evidence gap map.

Authors:  Matteo Vergani; Fethi Mansouri; Enqi Weng; Praveena Rajkobal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 3.  Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Sara Cooper; Bey-Marrié Schmidt; Evanson Z Sambala; Alison Swartz; Christopher J Colvin; Natalie Leon; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Exploring family members' and health care professionals' perceptions on ICU diaries: a systematic review and qualitative data synthesis.

Authors:  Bruna Brandao Barreto; Mariana Luz; Selma Alves Valente do Amaral Lopes; Regis Goulart Rosa; Dimitri Gusmao-Flores
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Psychological and Interpersonal Factors Associated with Sexualized Drug Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Lafortune; Martin Blais; Geneviève Miller; Laurence Dion; Frédérick Lalonde; Luc Dargis
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 6.  Plausible conditions and mechanisms for increasing physical activity behavior in men with prostate cancer using patient education interventions: sequential explanatory mixed studies synthesis.

Authors:  Elochukwu Fortune Ezenwankwo; Portia Motsoeneng; Elizabeth Maria Atterbury; Yumna Albertus; Estelle Victoria Lambert; Delva Shamley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Claire Glenton; Benedicte Carlsen; Simon Lewin; Manuela Dominique Wennekes; Brita Askeland Winje; Renske Eilers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-20

8.  Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Katarzyna Campbell; Thomas Coleman-Haynes; Katharine Bowker; Sue E Cooper; Sarah Connelly; Tim Coleman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-22

9.  Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol.

Authors:  Yvonne Kelly; Niamh O'Rourke; Rachel Flynn; Josephine Hegarty; Laura O'Connor
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Houghton; Maura Dowling; Pauline Meskell; Andrew Hunter; Heidi Gardner; Aislinn Conway; Shaun Treweek; Katy Sutcliffe; Jane Noyes; Declan Devane; Jane R Nicholas; Linda M Biesty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.