Eric J Buenz1, Gareth J Parry2. 1. Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, Nelson, New Zealand. Electronic address: Eric.Buenz@nmit.ac.nz. 2. Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, Nelson, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to determine if conversion from eating wild game harvested with lead-based ammunition to nonlead-based ammunition results in lower blood lead levels. Supersonic injection of toxin-leeching frangible projectiles into food is intuitively bad. As much as 95% of the ~13.7 million hunters in the United States choose shrapnel-inducing lead bullets to kill game; in addition, not harvesting meat is an incarcerable crime. A lead ammunition ban on certain federal lands was recently rescinded and the National Rifle Association refutes any risk from eating lead bullet-harvested game. METHODS: A patient subsisting solely on lead-shot meat was converted to non-lead ammunition and his blood lead level tracked. Concomitant with his conversion to nonlead ammunition, a controlled experiment was performed using the patient's bullets to determine his daily lead intake from lead-shot meat. RESULTS: While eating lead-shot meat, the patient was consuming 259.3 ± 235.6 µg of lead daily and his blood lead level was 74.7 µg/dL. Conversion to nonlead ammunition was associated with a reduced blood lead level. CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe blood lead levels can occur from eating game harvested with lead ammunition. Physicians should warn hunting patients of this potential risk and counsel them about the availability of nonlead ammunition alternatives.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to determine if conversion from eating wild game harvested with lead-based ammunition to nonlead-based ammunition results in lower blood lead levels. Supersonic injection of toxin-leeching frangible projectiles into food is intuitively bad. As much as 95% of the ~13.7 million hunters in the United States choose shrapnel-inducing lead bullets to kill game; in addition, not harvesting meat is an incarcerable crime. A lead ammunition ban on certain federal lands was recently rescinded and the National Rifle Association refutes any risk from eating lead bullet-harvested game. METHODS: A patient subsisting solely on lead-shot meat was converted to non-lead ammunition and his blood lead level tracked. Concomitant with his conversion to nonlead ammunition, a controlled experiment was performed using the patient's bullets to determine his daily lead intake from lead-shot meat. RESULTS: While eating lead-shot meat, the patient was consuming 259.3 ± 235.6 µg of lead daily and his blood lead level was 74.7 µg/dL. Conversion to nonlead ammunition was associated with a reduced blood lead level. CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe blood lead levels can occur from eating game harvested with lead ammunition. Physicians should warn hunting patients of this potential risk and counsel them about the availability of nonlead ammunition alternatives.
Authors: Shukrullah Ahmadi; Barbara Le Bot; Roméo Zoumenou; Séverine Durand; Nadine Fiévet; Pierre Ayotte; Achille Massougbodji; Maroufou Jules Alao; Michel Cot; Philippe Glorennec; Florence Bodeau-Livinec Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonio Lenti; Alessandro Menozzi; Giorgio Fedrizzi; Simonetta Menotta; Tiziano Iemmi; Giorgio Galletti; Paolo Serventi; Simone Bertini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Axel J Berky; Emily Robie; Susy Navio Chipa; Ernesto J Ortiz; Emma J Palmer; Nelson A Rivera; Ana Maria Morales Avalos; Joel N Meyer; Heileen Hsu-Kim; William K Pan Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-05-08
Authors: Antje Gerofke; Ellen Ulbig; Annett Martin; Christine Müller-Graf; Thomas Selhorst; Carl Gremse; Markus Spolders; Helmut Schafft; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Matthias Greiner; Monika Lahrssen-Wiederholt; Andreas Hensel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240