M Echternach1, F Burk2, F Rose2, C T Herbst3, M Burdumy4, M Döllinger5, B Richter2. 1. Freiburger Institut für Musikermedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 60, 79106, Freiburg i.Br., Deutschland. matthias.echternach@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Freiburger Institut für Musikermedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 60, 79106, Freiburg i.Br., Deutschland. 3. Department für Musikwissenschaft, Universität Mozarteum Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich. 4. Medizin Physik, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 60a, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. 5. Abteilung für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie an der HNO Klinik Erlangen, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Bohlenplatz 21, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The influence of functional mass lesions on vocal fold oscillation patterns in vocally challenging tasks is not yet understood in detail. MATERIALS UND METHODS: Glissandi on the vowel [a:] from 220 to 440 Hz and 440 to 880 Hz were analyzed in three groups of four professional female singers: without a mass lesion or dysphony (group A), with a functional mass lesion (swellings without a great impact on oscillation patterns during stroboscopy; group B), and with organic dysphony (group C). High-speed digital imaging (HSDI; 20,000 fps), and acoustic and electroglottographic (EGG) signals were used for analysis. Based on the EGG sample entropy, time windows for analysis of register transition phenomena were constructed. The voice signals (glottal area waveform, GAW; acoustic and EGG signals) were perceptually rated in terms of the noticeability of registration events. RESULTS: The absolute sample entropy revealed maxima in fundamental frequency regions where register transitions typically occur. Groups A and B could be distinguished neither by perceptual rating nor based on sample entropy values. In comparison to the other two groups, the absolute sample entropy values of group C were greater in the lower glissando. However, the larger vocal fold oscillatory irregularities were observable for the upper glissando in this group. CONCLUSION: Functional mass lesions do not influence biomechanics adversely in vocally challenging tasks such as register transitions. The use of sample entropy as a criterion for detection of register transitions is promising, but needs further validation.
BACKGROUND: The influence of functional mass lesions on vocal fold oscillation patterns in vocally challenging tasks is not yet understood in detail. MATERIALS UND METHODS: Glissandi on the vowel [a:] from 220 to 440 Hz and 440 to 880 Hz were analyzed in three groups of four professional female singers: without a mass lesion or dysphony (group A), with a functional mass lesion (swellings without a great impact on oscillation patterns during stroboscopy; group B), and with organic dysphony (group C). High-speed digital imaging (HSDI; 20,000 fps), and acoustic and electroglottographic (EGG) signals were used for analysis. Based on the EGG sample entropy, time windows for analysis of register transition phenomena were constructed. The voice signals (glottal area waveform, GAW; acoustic and EGG signals) were perceptually rated in terms of the noticeability of registration events. RESULTS: The absolute sample entropy revealed maxima in fundamental frequency regions where register transitions typically occur. Groups A and B could be distinguished neither by perceptual rating nor based on sample entropy values. In comparison to the other two groups, the absolute sample entropy values of group C were greater in the lower glissando. However, the larger vocal fold oscillatory irregularities were observable for the upper glissando in this group. CONCLUSION: Functional mass lesions do not influence biomechanics adversely in vocally challenging tasks such as register transitions. The use of sample entropy as a criterion for detection of register transitions is promising, but needs further validation.
Authors: F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; G Molenberghs; M Remacle; L Heylen; B Millet; K Van Lierde; J Raes; P H Van de Heyning Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Christian T Herbst; Jörg Lohscheller; Jan G Švec; Nathalie Henrich; Gerald Weissengruber; W Tecumseh Fitch Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Matthias Echternach; Fabian Burk; Marie Köberlein; Andreas Selamtzis; Michael Döllinger; Michael Burdumy; Bernhard Richter; Christian Thomas Herbst Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240