| Literature DB >> 29247406 |
Agata Piekut1, Renata Baranowska2, Ewa Marchwińska-Wyrwał2, Małgorzata Ćwieląg-Drabek3, Ilona Hajok2, Grzegorz Dziubanek3, Elżbieta Grochowska-Niedworok4.
Abstract
The monitoring of soil quality should be a control tool used to reduce the adverse health effects arising from exposure to toxic chemicals in soil through cultivated crop absorption. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the monitoring and control system of soil quality in Poland, in terms of consumer safety, for agricultural plants cultivated in areas with known serious cadmium contamination, such as Silesia Province. To achieve the objective, the contents of cadmium in soils and vegetables in the Silesia administrative area were examined. The obtained results were compared with the results of soil contamination from the quality monitoring of arable soil in Poland. The studies show a significant exceedance of the permissible values of cadmium in soil samples and the vegetables cultivated on that soil. The threat to consumer health is a valid concern, although this threat was not indicated by the results of the national monitoring of soil quality. The results indicated an unequal distribution of risk to consumers resulting from contaminated soil. Moreover, the monitoring systems should be designed at the local or regional scale to guarantee the safety of consumers of edible plants cultivated in the areas contaminated with cadmium.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Consumer health risks; Monitoring; Plant contamination; Soil contamination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29247406 PMCID: PMC5732308 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6413-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1The location and number of IUNG measurement and control points in Polish provinces (IUNG 2012)
The concentration of cadmium in soils cultivated in the territorial units of the Silesia Province
| City/county |
| Concentration of Cd [mg kg−1 of dry weight] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Mean value | Median | SD | ||
| Bielski County | 25 | 0.50 | 2.52 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
| Bytom | 28 | 0.50 | 28.62 | 8.46 | 5.52 | 7.13 |
| Chorzow | 2 | 4.27 | 19.34 | 11.81 | 11.81 | 10.66 |
| Czestochowa | 43 | 0.50 | 4.92 | 1.06 | 0.50 | 1.20 |
| Dabrowa Gornicza | 12 | 0.50 | 5.74 | 3.20 | 3.84 | 1.91 |
| Gliwice | 2 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Jastrzebie-Zdroj | 8 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Katowice | 6 | 15.28 | 48.79 | 28.60 | 25.99 | 11.46 |
| Mikolow County | 56 | 0.50 | 3.11 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.50 |
| Myslowice | 61 | 0.50 | 6.73 | 3.00 | 2.88 | 1.49 |
| Myszkow County | 43 | 0.50 | 3.42 | 0.99 | 0.50 | 0.79 |
| Piekary Slaskie | 52 | 3.52 | 68.47 | 18.95 | 14.71 | 12.72 |
| Ruda Slaska | 12 | 4.10 | 9.12 | 5.21 | 4.76 | 1.43 |
| Rybnik | 1 | 0.50 | ||||
| Siemianowice Slaskie | 22 | 0.50 | 10.70 | 7.07 | 7.68 | 3.00 |
| Swietochlowice | 1 | 7.28 | ||||
| Tarnowskie Gory County | 60 | 0.50 | 227.55 | 9.25 | 5.12 | 29.35 |
| Tychy | 1 | 0.50 | ||||
| Wodzislaw County | 45 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Zabrze | 13 | 0.50 | 3.37 | 1.63 | 2.09 | 1.15 |
| Zory | 1 | 0.50 | ||||
Source: results of research conducted in the Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
The content of cadmium in vegetables from selected territorial units of the Silesia Province
| City/county | Carrot | Cabbage | Parsley root | Celery | Potato | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Cd [mg/kg f.m.] |
| Cd [mg/kg f.m.] |
| Cd [mg/kg f.m.] |
| Cd [mg/kg f.m.] |
| Cd [mg/kg f.m.] | |
| Chorzow | 3 | 0.53 | – | – | 3 | 0.22 | 4 | 0.31 | – | – |
| Dabrowa Gornicza | 1 | 0.21 | 1 | 0.43 | – | – | 1 | 0.12 | – | – |
| Jastrzebie-Zdroj | 2 | 0.11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Myszkowski County | 6 | 0.16 | 5 | < 0.06 | 6 | 0.10 | 6 | 0.28 | 6 | < 0.06 |
| Piekary Slaskie | 3 | 0.66 | 11 | 0.58 | 3 | 0.40 | – | – | 3 | 0.28 |
| Ruda Slaska | 3 | 0.15 | – | – | 4 | 0.07 | 4 | 0.59 | 1 | 0.50 |
| Siemianowice Slaskie | 1 | 0.35 | – | – | 3 | 0.28 | – | – | – | – |
| Sosnowiec | 3 | 0.19 | – | – | 3 | 0.07 | – | – | 3 | 0.06 |
| Tarnowskie Gory County | 1 | 0.01 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Source: results of research conducted in the Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice