| Literature DB >> 29247205 |
Shingo Maeda1, Tatsuro Nakamura1, Hiroaki Harada2, Yuri Tachibana1, Kosuke Aritake3, Tatsuo Shimosawa4, Yutaka Yatomi4, Takahisa Murata5.
Abstract
Food allergy is immediate hypersensitive reactions to ingested foods. Since early diagnosis is effective for disease control, development of an objective diagnostic index is required. Using mediator-lipidomics, we found that levels of the urinary prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) metabolite, tetranor-PGDM, reflected the severity of the allergic symptoms and intestinal mast cell hyperplasia in mice. Repeated oral challenges with ovalbumin promoted allergic symptoms in sensitized mice. Particularly, the allergic mice presented with increased numbers of intestinal mast cells, which strongly expressed hematopoietic PGD synthase (H-PGDS). The levels of urinary tetranor-PGDM increased as the disease progressed. Treatment with a mast cell inactivator or an anti-inflammatory steroid attenuated these symptoms and decreased the tetranor-PGDM urinary levels. The levels of urinary tetranor-PGDM did not correlate with the disease severity in murine models of colitis, asthma, or allergic dermatitis. Furthermore, we have shown that urinary levels of tetranor-PGDM were significantly higher in patients with food allergy than those in healthy volunteers and patients with other types of allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. These findings suggest that urinary tetranor-PGDM is a useful diagnostic index of food allergy in both mice and humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29247205 PMCID: PMC5732293 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17798-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Urinary tetranor-PGDM is an index of food allergy. (a) Systemic allergic score (left) and diarrhea occurrence (right) in oral OVA- or saline-challenged BALB/c WT mice (n = 9–13). Kruskal–Wallis test with the Steel-Dwass test was used. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 vs. saline-challenged mice. (b) Chloroacetate esterase (CAE)-stained ileum and colon sections following the tenth OVA-challenge. Arrowheads indicate mast cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. (c) Mast cell number per high-power field (HPF) in the colon of OVA- or saline-challenged mice (n = 4–8). (d) Tetranor-PGDM (left) and tetranor-PGEM (right) in urine of OVA- or saline-challenged mice (n = 5–10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs. saline-challenged mice. (e) Correlation between urinary tetranor-PGDM level and allergic score (left) or intestinal mast cell number (right) in OVA-challenged mice (n = 4). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used. (f) Systemic allergic score in oral milk- or saline-challenged mice (n = 5 each). Kruskal-Wallis test with the Steel-Dwass test was used. *** P < 0.001 vs. saline-challenged mice. (g) Urinary tetranor-PGDM in oral milk- or saline-challenged mice (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs. saline-challenged mice.
Figure 2Cellular and enzymatic source of tetranor-PGDM in food allergy. (a) Diarrhea occurrence in OVA-induced food allergic mice treated with cromolyn (15 mg/kg) or vehicle (n = 5 each). (b) Mean number of intestinal mast cells in OVA-induced food allergic mice treated with cromolyn (15 mg/kg) or vehicle (n = 4 each). Student’s t test was used. *** P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated mice. (c) Urinary tetranor-PGDM level in OVA-induced food allergic mice treated with cromolyn (15 mg/kg) or vehicle (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated mice. (d) PGD2 production in naive, sensitized, and degranulated BMMCs in vitro (n = 4 each). (e) Urinary tetranor-PGDM in naïve or BMMC transferred Kit mice (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs. naïve mice. (f) Urinary tetranor-PGDM and tetranor-PGEM levels in fifth OVA-challenged mice with either vehicle, indomethacin (5 mg/kg), SC-560 (10 mg/kg), or NS-398 (10 mg/kg) (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used. * P < 0.05 and *** P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated mice. (g) Immunostained colon sections with H-PGDS (red) and c-kit (green, upper) or COX-2 (green, lower) following the tenth OVA-challenge. Scale bar: 25 μm. (h) Urinary tetranor-PGDM level in fifth OVA-challenged WT, H-PGDS −/−, and L-PGDS −/− mice (n = 5–8). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used. * P < 0.05 vs. WT mice.
Figure 3Urinary tetranor-PGDM in other disease models and human patients. (a) H&E-stained colon sections in DSS-induced colitis. Arrowheads indicate mucosal damages. Scale bar: 200 μm. Inset: Neutrophil infiltration. Scale bar: 25 μm. (b) Mean number of colonic neutrophils (left) and mast cells (right) in DSS- or water-treated mice (n = 5 each). Student’s t test was used. *** P < 0.001 vs. water-treated mice. (c) Disease activity index in DSS- or water-treated mice (n = 5 each). Kruskal-Wallis test with the Steel-Dwass test was used. ** P < 0.01 vs. water-treated mice. (d) Urinary tetranor-PGDM (left) and tetranor-PGEM (right) in DSS- or water-treated mice (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs. water-treated mice. (e) H&E-stained lung sections in the allergic airway inflammation. Arrowheads indicate leukocyte accumulation. Scale bar: 200 μm. Inset: Eosinophil infiltration. Scale bar: 25 μm. (f) Mean number of lung eosinophils (left) and mast cells (right) in intranasal OVA- or saline-challenged mice (n = 5–7). Student’s t test was used. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs. saline-challenged mice. (g) Urinary tetranor-PGDM in intranasal OVA- or saline-challenged mice (n = 5–7). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used. *** P < 0.001 vs. saline-challenged mice. (h) H&E-stained ear sections in the allergic dermatitis. Arrows indicate ear thickening. Scale bar: 50 μm. Inset: Eosinophil infiltration. Scale bar: 10 μm. (i) Mean number of eosinophils (left) and mast cells (right) in the ears of DNFB- or vehicle-treated mice (n = 5 each). Student’s t test was used. *** P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated mice. (j) Urinary tetranor-PGDM in DNFB- or vehicle-treated mice (n = 5 each). One-way ANOVA was used. (k) Urinary tetranor-PGDM in healthy human volunteers (n = 39) and patients with asthma (n = 37), allergic rhinitis (n = 8), atopic dermatitis (n = 5), and food allergy (n = 9). The mean of the levels of tetranor-PGDM in each group is denoted by horizontal lines. Kruskal-Wallis test with the Steel-Dwass test was used. * P < 0.05 and *** P < 0.001 vs. patients with food allergy.