Literature DB >> 29246818

Increased 1-year continuation of DMPA among women randomized to self-administration: results from a randomized controlled trial at Planned Parenthood.

Julia E Kohn1, Hannah R Simons2, Lisa Della Badia2, Elissa Draper2, Johanna Morfesis2, Elizabeth Talmont3, Anitra Beasley4, Melanie McDonald2, Carolyn L Westhoff5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-sc) is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Our objective was to compare one-year continuation of DMPA-sc between women randomized to self-administration versus clinic administration. STUDY
DESIGN: We randomized 401 females ages 15-44 requesting DMPA at clinics in Texas and New Jersey to self-administration or clinic administration in a 1:1 allocation. Clinic staff taught participants randomized to self-administration to self-inject and observed the first injection; participants received instructions, a sharps container, and three doses for home use. Participants randomized to clinic administration received usual care. All participants received DMPA-sc at no cost and injection reminders via text message or email. We conducted follow-up surveys at six and 12 months.
RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-six participants (84%) completed the 12-month survey; 316 completed both follow-up surveys (an 80% response rate excluding eight withdrawals). Participants ranged in age from 16-44. One-year DMPA continuous use was 69% in the self-administration group and 54% in the clinic group (p=.005). There were three self-reported pregnancies during the study period, all occurred in the clinic group; all three women had discontinued DMPA and one reported her pregnancy as intended. Among the self-administration group, 97% reported that self-administration was very or somewhat easy; 87% would recommend self-administration of DMPA-sc to a friend. Among the clinic group, 52% reported interest in self-administration in the future. Satisfaction was similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: DMPA self-administration improves contraceptive continuation and is a feasible and acceptable option for women and adolescents. IMPLICATIONS: Self-administration of subcutaneous DMPA can improve contraceptive access, autonomy, and continuation, and is a feasible and acceptable option for women and adolescents. It should be made widely available as an option for women and adolescents.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; Injectable; Self-administration; Self-injection; Subcutaneous DMPA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29246818     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  15 in total

1.  Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Mary Lyn Gaffield; Martha Brady; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-04-02

2.  Trends in subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) use in Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda.

Authors:  Philip Anglewicz; Pierre Akilimali; Georges Guiella; Patrick Kayembe; Simon P S Kibira; Fredrick Makumbi; Amy Tsui; Scott Radloff
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019-11-09

3.  Predictors of DMPA-SC continuation among urban Nigerian women: the influence of counseling quality and side effects.

Authors:  Jenny Liu; Jennifer Shen; Nadia Diamond-Smith
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Is contraceptive self-injection cost-effective compared to contraceptive injections from facility-based health workers? Evidence from Uganda.

Authors:  Laura Di Giorgio; Mercy Mvundura; Justine Tumusiime; Chloe Morozoff; Jane Cover; Jennifer Kidwell Drake
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Continuation of subcutaneous or intramuscular injectable contraception when administered by facility-based and community health workers: findings from a prospective cohort study in Burkina Faso and Uganda.

Authors:  Ellen MacLachlan; Lynn M Atuyambe; Tieba Millogo; Georges Guiella; Seydou Yaro; Simon Kasasa; Justine Bukenya; Agnes Nyabigambo; Fredrick Mubiru; Justine Tumusiime; Yentéma Onadja; Lonkila Moussa Zan; Clarisse Goeum/Sanon; Seni Kouanda; Allen Namagembe
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Continuation of injectable contraception when self-injected vs. administered by a facility-based health worker: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study in Uganda.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Allen Namagembe; Justine Tumusiime; Damalie Nsangi; Jeanette Lim; Dinah Nakiganda-Busiku
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Continuation of self-injected versus provider-administered contraception in Senegal: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Maymouna Ba; Jennifer Kidwell Drake; Marėme Dia NDiaye
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Cost-effectiveness of self-injected DMPA-SC compared with health-worker-injected DMPA-IM in Senegal.

Authors:  Mercy Mvundura; Laura Di Giorgio; Chloe Morozoff; Jane Cover; Marguerite Ndour; Jennifer Kidwell Drake
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019

Review 9.  CE: An Evidence-Based Update on Contraception.

Authors:  Laura E Britton; Amy Alspaugh; Madelyne Z Greene; Monica R McLemore
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.577

10.  Ugandan providers' views on the acceptability of contraceptive self-injection for adolescents: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jane Cover; Allen Namagembe; Justine Tumusiime; Jeanette Lim; Carie Muntifering Cox
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.