Literature DB >> 29246237

Zika virus can be venereally transmitted between Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.

Stéphanie Silva Campos1, Rosilainy Surubi Fernandes1, Alexandre Araujo Cunha Dos Santos2, Rafaella Moraes de Miranda1, Erich Loza Telleria3, Anielly Ferreira-de-Brito1, Marcia Gonçalves de Castro1, Anna-Bella Failloux4, Myrna C Bonaldo2, Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alternative transmission routes have been described for Zika virus (ZIKV). Here, we assessed for the first time the venereal transmission of ZIKV between Aedes aegypti under laboratory conditions.
RESULTS: Orally-infected mosquito females were able to transmit the virus to males venereally, and males inoculated intrathoracically were capable of infecting females during mating. The genome of venereally-transmitted virus recovered from males was identical to that of ZIKV ingested by mated females.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that venereal transmission between Aedes mosquitoes might contribute to Zika virus maintenance in nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; Venereal transmission; Zika virus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29246237      PMCID: PMC5731190          DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2543-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Zika virus (ZIKV, Flavivirus, Flaviviridae) is an arbovirus that has undergone a rapid spread in the Pacific region and across tropical America since 2015, causing a severe pandemic in 2015–2016 [1-3]. Moreover, microcephaly and other congenital neurological malformations and disorders were associated with ZIKV infections worldwide, which have made this virus currently one of the most significant public health issues. ZIKV transmission to people is primarily through the bite of an infected Aedes mosquitoes, mainly Aedes aegypti [1, 4]. However, the description of other modes of transmission, like inter-human contamination, may also explain ZIKV emergence, its efficient spread and maintenance in nature [5-8]. Moreover, inter-mosquito transmission through the vertical route is also likely to play a role. Therefore, we experimentally demonstrated that ZIKV could be venereally transmitted between Ae. aegypti, a phenomenon that could help in perpetuating ZIKV in nature.

Methods

We experimentally assessed venereal transmission in two populations of Brazilian Ae. aegypti mosquitoes: Urca (URC; F2 generation), Rio de Janeiro, coastal Southeast region, and Goiânia (GOI; F1 generation), Goiás, inland Central-West region. Their F0 generation tested negative for ZIKV by qRT-PCR as described previously [9]. Mosquitoes were reared at 26 ± 1 °C, 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle and 70 ± 10% humidity (standardized environmental condition, SEC) as previously described [9, 10]. Mosquitoes were sexed at the pupal stage, and the emerged adults of each gender were maintained in distinct cages supplied with a 10% sucrose solution at SEC. Virgin Ae. aegypti females aged 5–7 days post-emergence were orally challenged with two ZIKV strains belonging to the Asian lineage, namely ZIKV-Rio-U1 (GenBank: KU926309) and ZIKV-PE243 (GenBank: KX197192), respectively, isolated from humans in Southeast [11] and Northeast [12] Brazil. These ZIKV strains display 99% nucleotide and amino acid identity and may similarly infect Brazilian Ae. aegypti [9-12]. Accordingly, females were provided with a mixture containing two parts of washed rabbit erythrocytes and one part of viral suspension at a final titter of 106 PFU/ml as described previously [9]. We incubated sets of fully engorged females at SEC in cylindrical carton cages (20 × 16 cm) daily supplied with a 10% sucrose solution. Groups of 10–30 females corresponding to each combination of the mosquito population and virus strain were randomly killed, and body homogenates in culture medium were examined by RT-qPCR for determining infection rates (IR) on the 10th and 14th day post-infection (dpi) as described elsewhere [9]. At this same dpi, virgin males of the same population, generation and age were introduced into the respective female-infected cages at two sex ratios (Table 1). Then, distinct groups of mosquitoes were allowed to freely mate for 30 h devoid of any food source, to avoid oral contamination, or for 5 days provided with a piece of cotton mesh imbibed with 10% sucrose solution on the top of the cage. In the last case, samples of the sucrose solution probed by mosquitoes were examined daily for the presence of ZIKV by RT-qPCR, and have always tested ZIKV-negative. On completion of the above-mentioned contact periods, samples of 30 females were dissected to determine insemination rates, that is, the proportion of females with spermatheca containing spermatozoids [13]. RNA was extracted from male entire body homogenates for determining IR by RT-qPCR and whole viral genome sequencing on the 14th day after mating as described [9, 11]. Due to the scanty number of health or surviving males that mated with infected females, we decide to intrathoracically inject virgin males with ZIKV to access venereal transmission from male to female. Thus, the supernatant of the body homogenate of one venereally contaminated URC male was inoculated in other URC virgin males. After 10 and 14 days of incubation at SEC, URC virgin females were left to mate for 30 h (devoid of any food source) at a sex ratio of 1 male:2 females, and incubated for 14 days at SEC. Male and female entire body homogenates were tested by RT-qPCR [9]. Aiming to investigate possible genetic changes in the viral genome occurring during the venereal transmission, we also extracted RNA and sequenced the whole genome from the virus of the infectious meal taken by females as well as from a pool of five infected females that mated with the venereally contaminated males. Nucleotide sequences were aligned, edited and compared as described previously [11].
Table 1

Infection rates in Aedes aegypti females orally challenged with ZIKV and males contaminated by the venereal route

Mosquito populationZIKV strainSex ratio female: male (insemination rate)a Female orally challengedMale venereal transmission
n IR (%) n IR (%)
UrcaRioU1256:256 (90%)b 30631100.9
RioU137:19 (97%)c 1070200
PE24376:76 (50%)b 3046380
GoiâniaRioU190:45 (100%)c 1050633.0

Abbreviations: n number of tested mosquitoes, IR infection rate referring to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected body among tested ones

aInsemination rate is the proportion of females with spermathecal containing spermatozoids

bContact for 30 h

cContact for 5 days

Infection rates in Aedes aegypti females orally challenged with ZIKV and males contaminated by the venereal route Abbreviations: n number of tested mosquitoes, IR infection rate referring to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected body among tested ones aInsemination rate is the proportion of females with spermathecal containing spermatozoids bContact for 30 h cContact for 5 days

Results

Insemination rates were 50–90% and 100% in females kept in contact with males for 30 h and 5 days, respectively. IRs in orally challenged females ranged from 46% to 70% in URC mosquitoes challenged with ZIKV-PE243 and ZIKV-Rio-U1, respectively (Table 1). Venereal transmission to males was achieved in mosquito groups whose females were infected with ZIKV-Rio-U1, where IRs in males was 0.9% in URC and 33% in GOI (median of viral loads in bodies of 1.5 × 106 RNA copies/ml; CT ≤ 17.2). No venereal transmission was detected in the mosquito groups infected with ZIKV-PE243, whose females coincidently had the lowest insemination rates. IRs of intrathoracically inoculated males were 87.5 and 97.9% at 10 and 14 days, respectively (Table 2). Viral load in bodies of males at 10 and 14 days after injection reached 3.6 × 106 and 9.8 × 106 RNA copies/ml (median: 3.3 × 106 and 3.6 × 106; CT ≤ 15.6), respectively. Males with 10 days after inoculation could not venereally transmit the virus. However, the venereal transmission was detected in 50% of females mated by males with 14 days after intrathoracic injection (viral load in bodies of positive females ranging from 3.4 × 102 to 9.8 × 102 RNA copies/ml; CT ≤ 28.8). The compared ZIKV genomes were identical, with the virus recovered from a venereally contaminated male (URC-ZIKVRioU1) presenting a single nucleotide substitution at position 1115 (protein E) in which a thymine was replaced by a cytosine, without generating amino acid change.
Table 2

Infection rates in Aedes aegypti males inoculated intrathoracically with ZIKV-RioU1 and female contaminated by the venereal route. Mosquitoes were let to copulate for 30 h devoid of any food source at a sex ratio of: 1 male: 2 females (81:162)

Days after intrathoracic inoculation of malesMale inoculated intrathoracicallyFemale venereal transmission
nIR-mi (%)nIR-mi (%)
101087.5190
144197.91050

Abbreviations: n number of tested mosquitoes, IR Infection rate referring to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected body among tested ones by RT-qPCR

Infection rates in Aedes aegypti males inoculated intrathoracically with ZIKV-RioU1 and female contaminated by the venereal route. Mosquitoes were let to copulate for 30 h devoid of any food source at a sex ratio of: 1 male: 2 females (81:162) Abbreviations: n number of tested mosquitoes, IR Infection rate referring to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected body among tested ones by RT-qPCR

Discussion

Male Aedes mosquitoes have been found naturally infected with ZIKV in Africa [14] and South America [4], providing evidence that inter-mosquito contamination occurs in nature and this phenomenon may play some role in virus maintenance and viral evolution [15]. Being non-hematophagous, male mosquitoes may acquire an arbovirus infection through the vertical route. Nevertheless, the venereal transmission has also been experimentally demonstrated for several pairings insect-arbovirus [15-17], including other flaviviruses such as Japanese encephalitis, dengue and St Louis encephalitis viruses [18-20]. We demonstrated that ZIKV could be venereally transmitted between Ae. aegypti of two geographically-distant populations. Males obtained the infection from females and vice versa. Moreover, the genome of the virus transmitted by the venereal route was identical to those orally absolved as well as infecting females, suggesting that no expressive genetic changes occur in the viral genome during the venereal transmission. The efficiency of the venereal transmission route may be greater than expected. The variation in insemination and infection rates in orally-challenged females suggest that not all of them had sexual contact with males, especially in the groups brought into contact for only 30 h. The higher rate of venereal transmission from infected females to males (33%) was detected in the group of mosquitoes in which contact time was 5 days and insemination rate was of 100%, that is, all females had sexual contact with males. Considering that one male could have inseminated more than one female in such a group [13], it is possible that not all males had sexual contact with infected females, reducing the chance of venereal transmission. These data altogether may explain the large variation in male IRs. Several factors have been proposed to explain the silent endemic/enzootic maintenance of ZIKV in Africa and Asia as well as the recent fast spread of this virus in the West Hemisphere, but they remain poorly understood. Although the main mode of maintenance of ZIKV in nature is supposed to be the primate-mosquito-primate transmission cycle, evidence of inter-vertebrate (congenital, perinatal, sexual, occupational and others) [1, 5–7] and inter-invertebrate contamination routes (vertical and venereal) [8] may help in explaining the high capacity of ZIKV to be transmitted and spread.

Conclusion

We conclude that together with other modes of transmission, the venereal route in Aedes mosquitoes might contribute to ZIKV virus maintenance in nature.
  17 in total

1.  Venereal transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus in Culex bitaeniorhynchus mosquitoes.

Authors:  D T Mourya; R S Soman
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Venereal transmission of Chandipura virus by Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli).

Authors:  M S Mavale; P V Fulmali; G Geevarghese; V A Arankalle; Y S Ghodke; P C Kanojia; A C Mishra
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Zika virus emergence in mosquitoes in southeastern Senegal, 2011.

Authors:  Diawo Diallo; Amadou A Sall; Cheikh T Diagne; Oumar Faye; Ousmane Faye; Yamar Ba; Kathryn A Hanley; Michaela Buenemann; Scott C Weaver; Mawlouth Diallo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Culex quinquefasciatus from Rio de Janeiro Is Not Competent to Transmit the Local Zika Virus.

Authors:  Rosilainy Surubi Fernandes; Stéphanie Silva Campos; Anielly Ferreira-de-Brito; Rafaella Moraes de Miranda; Keli Antunes Barbosa da Silva; Marcia Gonçalves de Castro; Lidiane M S Raphael; Patrícia Brasil; Anna-Bella Failloux; Myrna C Bonaldo; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Vertical Transmission of Zika Virus by Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus Mosquitoes.

Authors:  Alexander T Ciota; Sean M Bialosuknia; Dylan J Ehrbar; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  First detection of natural infection of Aedes aegypti with Zika virus in Brazil and throughout South America.

Authors:  Anielly Ferreira-de-Brito; Ieda P Ribeiro; Rafaella Moraes de Miranda; Rosilainy Surubi Fernandes; Stéphanie Silva Campos; Keli Antunes Barbosa da Silva; Marcia Gonçalves de Castro; Myrna C Bonaldo; Patrícia Brasil; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 7.  Zika puzzle in Brazil: peculiar conditions of viral introduction and dissemination - A Review.

Authors:  Cristina Possas; Patricia Brasil; Mauro Ca Marzochi; Amilcar Tanuri; Reinaldo M Martins; Ernesto Ta Marques; Myrna C Bonaldo; Antonio Gp Ferreira; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Rita Maria R Nogueira; Patricia C Sequeira; Keyla Bf Marzochi; Akira Homma
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.743

8.  Isolation of Infective Zika Virus from Urine and Saliva of Patients in Brazil.

Authors:  Myrna C Bonaldo; Ieda P Ribeiro; Noemia S Lima; Alexandre A C Dos Santos; Lidiane S R Menezes; Stephanie O D da Cruz; Iasmim S de Mello; Nathália D Furtado; Elaine E de Moura; Luana Damasceno; Kely A B da Silva; Marcia G de Castro; Alexandra L Gerber; Luiz G P de Almeida; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Ana Tereza R Vasconcelos; Patrícia Brasil
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-06-24

9.  Travel-associated and autochthonous Zika virus infection in mainland France, 1 January to 15 July 2016.

Authors:  A Septfons; I Leparc-Goffart; E Couturier; F Franke; J Deniau; A Balestier; A Guinard; G Heuzé; A H Liebert; A Mailles; J R Ndong; I Poujol; S Raguet; C Rousseau; A Saidouni-Oulebsir; C Six; M Subiros; V Servas; E Terrien; H Tillaut; D Viriot; M Watrin; K Wyndels; H Noel; M C Paty; H De Valk
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-08-11

10.  Infection dynamics in a traveller with persistent shedding of Zika virus RNA in semen for six months after returning from Haiti to Italy, January 2016.

Authors:  Luisa Barzon; Monia Pacenti; Elisa Franchin; Enrico Lavezzo; Marta Trevisan; Dino Sgarabotto; Giorgio Palù
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-08-11
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.

Authors:  Rudi L Verspoor; Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Surveillance for Zika in Mexico: naturally infected mosquitoes in urban and semi-urban areas.

Authors:  Fabián Correa-Morales; Cassandra González-Acosta; David Mejía-Zúñiga; Herón Huerta; Crescencio Pérez-Rentería; Mauricio Vazquez-Pichardo; Aldo I Ortega-Morales; Luis M Hernández-Triana; Víctor M Salazar-Bueyes; Miguel Moreno-García
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Vector-borne transmission and evolution of Zika virus.

Authors:  Gladys Gutiérrez-Bugallo; Luis Augusto Piedra; Magdalena Rodriguez; Juan A Bisset; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Scott C Weaver; Nikos Vasilakis; Anubis Vega-Rúa
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 4.  The Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: From Discovery to Future Implications.

Authors:  Rachel Lowe; Christovam Barcellos; Patrícia Brasil; Oswaldo G Cruz; Nildimar Alves Honório; Hannah Kuper; Marilia Sá Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Viral pathogens hitchhike with insect sperm for paternal transmission.

Authors:  Qianzhuo Mao; Wei Wu; Zhenfeng Liao; Jiajia Li; Dongsheng Jia; Xiaofeng Zhang; Qian Chen; Hongyan Chen; Jing Wei; Taiyun Wei
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Venereal Transmission of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus by Culicoides sonorensis Midges.

Authors:  Paula Rozo-Lopez; Berlin Londono-Renteria; Barbara S Drolet
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-24

7.  Association of past dengue fever epidemics with the risk of Zika microcephaly at the population level in Brazil.

Authors:  Marilia Sá Carvalho; Laís Picinini Freitas; Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz; Patrícia Brasil; Leonardo Soares Bastos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Current Arboviral Threats and Their Potential Vectors in Thailand.

Authors:  Chadchalerm Raksakoon; Rutcharin Potiwat
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-18

9.  Evidence for infection but not transmission of Zika virus by Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Spain.

Authors:  Luis M Hernández-Triana; Elsa Barrero; Sarah Delacour-Estrella; Ignacio Ruiz-Arrondo; Javier Lucientes; Maria Del Mar Fernández de Marco; Leigh Thorne; Sarah Lumley; Nicholas Johnson; Karen L Mansfield; Anthony R Fooks
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Evidence of Zika virus horizontal and vertical transmission in Aedes albopictus from Spain but not infectious virus in saliva of the progeny.

Authors:  Ana I Nuñez; Sandra Talavera; Lotty Birnberg; Raquel Rivas; Núria Pujol; Marta Verdún; Carles Aranda; Miguel Berdugo; Núria Busquets
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.