Literature DB >> 29244222

Diffusion-weighted imaging features of breast tumours and the surrounding stroma reflect intrinsic heterogeneous characteristics of molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

Ming Fan1, Ting He1, Peng Zhang1, Hu Cheng1, Juan Zhang2, Xin Gao3, Lihua Li1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer heterogeneity is the main obstacle preventing the identification of patients with breast cancer with poor prognoses and treatment responses; however, such heterogeneity has not been well characterized. The purpose of this retrospective study was to reveal heterogeneous patterns in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) signals in tumours and the surrounding stroma to predict molecular subtypes of breast cancer. A dataset of 126 patients with breast cancer, who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on a 3.0-T image system, was collected. Breast images were segmented into regions comprising the tumour and surrounding stromal shells in which features that reflect heterogeneous ADC signal distribution were extracted. For each region, imaging features were computed, including the mean, minimum, variance, interquartile range (IQR), range, skewness, kurtosis and entropy of ADC values. Univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression modelling was performed to identify the magnetic resonance imaging features that optimally discriminate luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-enriched and basal-like molecular subtypes. The performance of the predictive models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the skewness in the tumour boundary achieved an AUC of 0.718 for discrimination between luminal A and non-luminal A tumours, whereas the IQR of the ADC value in the tumour boundary had an AUC of 0.703 for classification of the HER2-enriched subtype. Imaging features in the tumour boundary and the proximal peritumoral stroma corresponded to a higher overall prediction performance than those in other regions. A multivariate logistic regression model combining features in all the regions achieved an overall AUC of 0.800 for the classification of the four tumour subtypes. These findings suggest that features in the tumour boundary and stroma around the tumour may be further assessed as potential predictors of molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient; breast cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging; molecular subtype

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29244222     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  8 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence in clinical research of cancers.

Authors:  Dan Shao; Yinfei Dai; Nianfeng Li; Xuqing Cao; Wei Zhao; Li Cheng; Zhuqing Rong; Lan Huang; Yan Wang; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Challenges in Metabolomics-Based Tests, Biomarkers Revealed by Metabolomic Analysis, and the Promise of the Application of Metabolomics in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Minno; Monica Gelzo; Marianna Caterino; Michele Costanzo; Margherita Ruoppolo; Giuseppe Castaldo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Peritumoral ADC values in breast cancer: region of interest selection, associations with hyaluronan intensity, and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Tiia Kettunen; Hidemi Okuma; Päivi Auvinen; Mazen Sudah; Satu Tiainen; Anna Sutela; Amro Masarwah; Markku Tammi; Raija Tammi; Sanna Oikari; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative Multiparametric MRI as an Imaging Biomarker for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Receptor Status and Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yang; Xiaofeng Chen; Tianhui Zhang; Fengyan Cheng; Yuting Liao; Xiangguan Chen; Zhuozhi Dai; Weixiong Fan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Toshiki Kazama; Taro Takahara; Jun Hashimoto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 8.  Perfusion-driven Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MRI in Oncology: Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends.

Authors:  Mami Iima
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.471

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.