Literature DB >> 29244161

The impact of coronary anomalies on the outcome in aortic valve surgery: comparison of bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve morphotype.

Shiho Naito1, Johannes Petersen1, Hermann Reichenspurner1, Evaldas Girdauskas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The association of anomalous anatomy of coronary arteries and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been sporadically reported. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of coronary anomalies between BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and to analyse their impact on major adverse cardiac events during and after aortic valve surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1099 consecutive patients who received preoperative coronary evaluation and elective aortic valve replacement/repair between January 2013 and July 2016 at our institution were involved. Based on surgical inspection at the open-heart surgery, a total of 345 (32%) patients were diagnosed with BAV, whereas the remaining 754 (68%) patients had TAV. Coronary anatomy was evaluated by preoperative coronary angiography (n = 1084) or multislice computed tomography (n = 15). The primary end-point was the prevalence of coronary anomalies in BAV versus TAV cohort. Secondary end-points included postoperative cardiac ischaemia markers, postoperative coronary artery imaging or interventions and hospital mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 46 (4%) coronary anomalies were detected and were significantly more frequent in the BAV group (7% vs 3%, P = 0.001). Postoperative markers of myocardial injury (creatine kinase/creatine kinase-MB and troponin) were increased and the need for postoperative coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly higher in patients with coronary anomalies (12% vs 1%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed significantly increased prevalence of coronary anomalies in BAV patients when compared with their tricuspid counterparts. Patients with diagnosed coronary anomalies had more postoperative ischaemic cardiac events that resulted in increased morbidity of this cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29244161     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  9 in total

1.  More than numbers: preprocedural multislice computed tomography analysis in a patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Kerstin Piayda; Katharina Hellhammer; Oliver Maier; Verena Veulemans
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Main Coronary Artery in the Setting of Critical Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Narayana Sarma V Singam; Taylor Burkhart; Sohail Ikram
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid valve morphology: a roadmap towards standardization.

Authors:  Tian-Yuan Xiong; Walid Ben Ali; Yuan Feng; Kentaro Hayashida; Hasan Jilaihawi; Azeem Latib; Michael Kang-Yin Lee; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar; Thomas Modine; Christoph Naber; Yong Peng; Nicolo Piazza; Michael J Reardon; Simon Redwood; Ashok Seth; Lars Sondergaard; Edgar Tay; Didier Tchetche; Wei-Hsian Yin; Mao Chen; Bernard Prendergast; Darren Mylotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Late onset of coronary ostial stenosis following surgical aortic valve replacement in a patient with anomalous origin of the right coronary artery.

Authors:  Motoyoshi Takahara; Yuta Imai; Fumihiro Miyashita; Yuki Uchio; Masahiro Makino; Motoki Uchihashi; Satoshi Kaimoto; Mitsuyoshi Hadase; Hiroyuki Kurata; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2021-07-30

6.  Coronary Artery Origins Pattern in Pediatric Patients with Right-Left Fusion Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Daniel N Beauchamp; Claudio Ramaciotti; Paul Brown; Poonam P Thankavel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 7.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: From Pathophysiological Mechanism, Imaging Diagnosis, to Clinical Treatment Methods.

Authors:  Nils Perrin; Réda Ibrahim; Nicolas Dürrleman; Arsène Basmadjian; Lionel Leroux; Philippe Demers; Thomas Modine; Walid Ben Ali
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Concomitant cardiovascular malformations in isolated bicuspid aortic valve disease: a retrospective cross-sectional study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katalin Szöcs; Betül Toprak; Gerhard Schön; Meike Rybczynski; Tatjana Brinken; Adrian Mahlmann; Evaldas Girdauskas; Stefan Blankenberg; Yskert von Kodolitsch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-08

9.  A SOX17-PDGFB signaling axis regulates aortic root development.

Authors:  Pengfei Lu; Ping Wang; Bingruo Wu; Yidong Wang; Yang Liu; Wei Cheng; Xuhui Feng; Xinchun Yuan; Miriam M Atteya; Haleigh Ferro; Yukiko Sugi; Grant Rydquist; Mahdi Esmaily; Jonathan T Butcher; Ching-Pin Chang; Jack Lenz; Deyou Zheng; Bin Zhou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 17.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.