Literature DB >> 2924402

Levels of mutagens in the urine of smokers of black and blond tobacco correlate with their risk of bladder cancer.

C Malaveille1, P Vineis, J Estéve, H Ohshima, G Brun, A Hautefeuille, P Gallet, G Ronco, B Terracini, H Bartsch.   

Abstract

Levels of urinary mutagens, thioethers, N-nitrosamino acids, nitrate, nicotine, cotinine and creatinine were measured in 21 non-smokers, 26 smokers of blond tobacco, 9 smokers of black tobacco and 5 smokers of both types of tobacco, all eating a similar diet. Results were expressed either per 24 h urine or per mmol creatinine. The sum of urinary nicotine and cotinine levels (N + C) was used as a measure of exposure to the number of cigarettes smoked. Statistically significant positive dose-effect relationships were obtained between the urinary N + C levels and (i) the number of revertants (Salmonella typhimurium TA98, with a metabolic activation system); (ii) the concentration of thioethers; (iii) the levels of N-nitrosoproline or the sum of all nitrosamino acids excreted and (iv) the amount of urinary nitrate. No such correlation was found between N + C levels and induction potency in the SOS chromotest. A linear dose-effect relationship between urinary mutagenicity (i.e. log revertants of S. typhimurium TA98) and N + C levels or number of cigarettes per day was established for smokers of blond tobacco. After adjustment for N + C levels, the urine of smokers of black tobacco contained twice as much mutagenic material as did the urine of blond tobacco smokers (P = 0.02). For other exposure markers, no statistically significant difference was found between the two types of smokers. Epidemiological studies have shown that the risk of urinary bladder cancer is 2.5 times higher in smokers of black tobacco than in blond tobacco. Therefore, our findings on urinary mutagenicity provide experimental evidence that the type of tobacco is the factor responsible for the observed difference in risk and that smoking of black as compared to blond tobacco results in a higher exposure of the urinary bladder to genotoxic hence potentially carcinogenic substances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2924402     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/10.3.577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  9 in total

1.  Parental Tobacco Smoking and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Childhood Leukemia International Consortium.

Authors:  Catherine Metayer; Eleni Petridou; Juan Manuel Mejía Aranguré; Eve Roman; Joachim Schüz; Corrado Magnani; Ana Maria Mora; Beth A Mueller; Maria S Pombo de Oliveira; John D Dockerty; Kathryn McCauley; Tracy Lightfoot; Emmanouel Hatzipantelis; Jérémie Rudant; Janet Flores-Lujano; Peter Kaatsch; Lucia Miligi; Catharina Wesseling; David R Doody; Maria Moschovi; Laurent Orsi; Stefano Mattioli; Steve Selvin; Alice Y Kang; Jacqueline Clavel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Interaction between dose and susceptibility to environmental cancer: a short review.

Authors:  E Hietanen; K Husgafvel-Pursiainen; H Vainio
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Tobacco, alcohol, and diet in the etiology of laryngeal cancer: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  W Zatonski; H Becher; J Lissowska; J Wahrendorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Sidestream cigarette smoke effects on cardiovascular responses in conscious rats: involvement of oxidative stress in the fourth cerebral ventricle.

Authors:  Vitor E Valenti; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Monica A Sato; Celso Ferreira; Fernando Adami; Fernando L A Fonseca; Valdelias Xavier; Moacir Godoy; Carlos B Monteiro; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Paulo H N Saldiva
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Analysis of 4-aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in human urinary bladder and lung by alkaline hydrolysis and negative ion gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D Lin; J O Lay; M S Bryant; C Malaveille; M Friesen; H Bartsch; N P Lang; F F Kadlubar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Biologic markers in risk assessment for environmental carcinogens.

Authors:  F Perera; J Mayer; R M Santella; D Brenner; A Jeffrey; L Latriano; S Smith; D Warburton; T L Young; W Y Tsai
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Salivary cotinine concentrations in daily smokers in Barcelona, Spain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marcela Fu; Esteve Fernandez; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; José A Pascual; Anna Schiaffino; Antoni Agudo; Carles Ariza; Josep M Borràs; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Molecular epidemiology in cancer risk assessment and prevention: recent progress and avenues for future research.

Authors:  G N Wogan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Genetic and non-genetic predictors of LINE-1 methylation in leukocyte DNA.

Authors:  Salman M Tajuddin; André F S Amaral; Agustín F Fernández; Sandra Rodríguez-Rodero; Ramón María Rodríguez; Lee E Moore; Adonina Tardón; Alfredo Carrato; Montserrat García-Closas; Debra T Silverman; Brian P Jackson; Reina García-Closas; Ashley L Cook; Kenneth P Cantor; Stephen Chanock; Manolis Kogevinas; Nathaniel Rothman; Francisco X Real; Mario F Fraga; Núria Malats
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.