Literature DB >> 29243996

Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine.

Anna MacDowall1, Martin Skeppholm2, Yohan Robinson1, Claes Olerud1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The visual analog scale (VAS) is frequently used to measure treatment outcome in patients with cervical spine disorders. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in a score that has clinical importance to the patient. Although it has been established for other medical fields, knowledge of the VAS MCID for the cervical spine is sparse, and it has rarely been considered in relation to measurement noise. The goals in this study were as follows: 1) to validate the VAS-neck and VAS-arm instruments for the cervical spine (e.g., repeatability); 2) to investigate the possible influence of predictive factors and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score on repeatability; and 3) to compute the MCID with 5 different methods. METHODS A post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial with 151 patients undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy due to degenerative disc disease was performed. Information on age, sex, smoking habits, exercise, employment status, HADS score, and VAS-neck and VAS-arm scores was gathered before surgery and after 1 year. The VAS was applied twice on every occasion, with 15 minutes in between. Repeatability and the association with predictors and HADS score were analyzed using the 1-sample t-test, linear regression models, and Spearman correlation. The MCID was calculated with the following methods: average change, change difference, receiver operating characteristic curve, effect size, and minimum detectable change (MDC). RESULTS The repeatability in VAS-neck was 8.1 mm, and in VAS-arm it was 10.4 mm. Less consistent values on the VAS correlated to female sex and higher values on the HADS. For VAS-neck the MCID ranged from 4.6 to 21.4, and for VAS-arm it ranged from 1.1 to 29.1. The highest MCID came from the MDC method, which was the only method that gave values above the measurement noise in both VAS-neck and VAS-arm. CONCLUSIONS Measurement noise in VAS-neck and VAS-arm for the cervical spine was influenced by female sex and HADS score. The only method to compute MCID that consistently gave results above the measurement noise in VAS-neck and VAS-arm was the MDC. Clinical trial registration no.: 44347115 ( www.isrctn.com ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI = confidence interval; DDD = degenerative disc disease; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; MDC = minimum detectable change; PROM = patient-reported outcome measures; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; SD = standard deviation; SEM = standard error of measurement; VAS = visual analog scale; cervical degenerative disc disease; minimum clinically important difference; surgical treatment; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29243996     DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE1732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  23 in total

1.  Improvement rates, adverse events and predictors of clinical outcome following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Eddie de Dios; Mats Laesser; Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher; Lars Lindhagen; Anna MacDowall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  A Multiparametric Method Based on Clinical and CT-Based Radiomics to Predict the Expression of p53 and VEGF in Patients With Spinal Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.

Authors:  Qizheng Wang; Yang Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Xiaoying Xing; Yongye Chen; Ke Nie; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su; Ning Lang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic management of patients with cervicogenic dizziness.

Authors:  Charlotte De Vestel; Luc Vereeck; Susan A Reid; Vincent Van Rompaey; Joris Lemmens; Willem De Hertogh
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a long-term study of a national cohort.

Authors:  Eddie de Dios; Robert F Heary; Lars Lindhagen; Anna MacDowall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Effects of SNAG mobilization combined with a self-SNAG home-exercise for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Paquin; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Jean-Pierre Dumas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-02-05

6.  The Influence of Cervical Spine Angulation on Symptoms Associated With Wearing a Rigid Neck Collar.

Authors:  Taiwo D Kelani; Annabelle Lee; Miny Walker; Louis J Koizia; Melanie Dani; Michael B Fertleman; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-06

7.  Surgical treatment of the severely damaged atlantoaxial joint with C1-C2 facet spacers: Three case reports.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tominaga; Anna MacDowall; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Correlation of Anterior Interbody Graft Choice With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cervical Spine Trauma.

Authors:  Hui Qing Lee; Chien Yew Kow; Jay Shen Ng; Patrick Chan; Lu Ton; Greg Etherington; Susan Liew; Martin Hunn; Mark Fitzgerald; Jin Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-02-05

9.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

10.  Three-Dimensional Printed Model-Assisted Screw Installation in Treating Posterior Atlantoaxial Internal Fixation.

Authors:  Minyi Yang; Nannan Zhang; Haodong Shi; Hui Li; Shichang Liu; Zongrang Song; Lequn Shan; Qining Wu; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.