Literature DB >> 29243548

Readability of Human Subjects Training Materials for Research.

Kristie B Hadden1, Latrina Prince1, Laura James1, Jennifer Holland1, Christopher R Trudeau1.   

Abstract

Institutions are required to ensure that persons involved in human subjects research receive appropriate human subjects protections training and education. Several organizations use the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) program to fulfill training requirements. Most researchers find the CITI program too complex for community members who collaborate with researchers. This study aimed to determine the readability of CITI modules most frequently used in community-based participatory research (CBPR). The mean readability level of the CITI modules is 14.8 grade; CBPR readability levels ranged from 11.6 to 12.0 grade (sixth- to eighth-grade reading level is recommended). With a baseline objective measure, modifications can be made to improve the plain language quality and understandability of human subjects training modules for community members.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative; community-based participatory research; human subjects research training; plain language; readability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29243548      PMCID: PMC5768447          DOI: 10.1177/1556264617742238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  12 in total

Review 1.  Community based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century.

Authors:  Margaret W Leung; Irene H Yen; Meredith Minkler
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities.

Authors:  Barbara A Israel; Chris M Coombe; Rebecca R Cheezum; Amy J Schulz; Robert J McGranaghan; Richard Lichtenstein; Angela G Reyes; Jaye Clement; Akosua Burris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?

Authors:  Leonardo Tamariz; Heidy Medina; Janielle Taylor; Olveen Carrasquillo; Erin Kobetz; Ana Palacio
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Nancy C Hawley; Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Irene G Sia
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

6.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

7.  Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Patricia J Piechowski
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Culturally Relevant Human Subjects Protection Training: A Case Study in Community-Engaged Research in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer Kue; Laura A Szalacha; Mary Beth Happ; Abigail L Crisp; Usha Menon
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-02

Review 9.  A field training guide for human subjects research ethics.

Authors:  Maria W Merritt; Alain B Labrique; Joanne Katz; Mahbubur Rashid; Keith P West; Joan Pettit
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.

Authors:  Meg Wilson
Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.