Literature DB >> 29242989

Prosthetic supply of facial defects: long-term experience and retrospective analysis on 99 patients.

Giorgos Papaspyrou1, Cansel Yildiz1, Victoria Bozzato1, Christopher Bohr2, Mathias Schneider3, Dietmar Hecker1, Bernhard Schick1, Basel Al Kadah4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Defects in the head region may be caused by tumour treatments, injuries, as well as congenital malformations. The restoration of these defects that can be performed through reconstructive plastic surgery and/or prosthetic surgery occupies a high priority in the physical and psychological rehabilitation of the patient. The present study reports on long-term experience in supply of facial prosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 99 patients, who had been supplied with custom-made facial prostheses between 2001 and 2011, were evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS: There were 59 male (60%) and 40 (40%) female patients. The reason for prosthetic supplement was a tumour disease in 50 patients, congenital malformation in 39 patients, and trauma in 10 patients. Fifty-three patients were treated with ear prosthesis, twenty-seven patients were treated with eye prosthesis, and nineteen patients with nasal prosthesis. 82.8% of prosthetic supplies were designed as magnetic support prostheses. The most common complication was skin redness around the implants. 10% of patients suffered the loss of the osseointegrated implants.
CONCLUSION: The osseointegrated titanium implants with magnet support provide a reliable attachment for prosthesis and constitute a promising alternative to surgical reconstruction of complex facial defects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital malformation; Long-term experience; Microtia; Prosthesis; Prosthetic surgery; Trauma; Tumour

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29242989     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4835-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses.

Authors:  R Alvi; J McPhail; K Hancock
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-12

2.  [Epithetic replacement in otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  V Bozzato; M H Schneider; B Al Kadah; B Schick
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Two rare complications in patients with bone-anchored hearing aids].

Authors:  T Deitmer; M Krassort; S Hartmann
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.057

4.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study on skin-penetrating titanium implants used for bone-anchored auricular prostheses.

Authors:  K M Holgers; A Tjellstrom; L M Bjursten; B E Erlandsson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  A Tjellström; J Lindström; O Hallén; T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1981-04

6.  The bone-anchored auricular episthesis.

Authors:  A Tjellström; J Lindström; O Nylén; T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; B Birgersson; H Nero; C Sylvén
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

8.  Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using extraoral implants.

Authors:  Alessandra Leonardi; Sara Buonaccorsi; Valentina Pellacchia; Luca Maria Moricca; Elena Indrizzi; Giuseppina Fini
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Craniofacial reconstructions with bone-anchored epithesis in head and neck cancer patients--a valid way back to self-perception and social reintegration.

Authors:  Jens Wagenblast; Mehran Baghi; Matthias Helbig; Christoph Arnoldner; Sotirios Bisdas; Wolfgang Gstöttner; Markus Hambek; Angelika May
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Authors:  Philipp A Federspil
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Implant-supported orbital prosthesis: a technical innovation of silicone fabrication.

Authors:  Mi Young Eo; Yun Ju Cho; Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen; Mi Hyun Seo; Soung Min Kim
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 2.  Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part A: The Art of Imitating Life.

Authors:  Rena L J Cruz; Maureen T Ross; Sean K Powell; Maria A Woodruff
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 3.  Outcome measures in facial prosthesis research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachael Y Jablonski; Benjamin J Veale; Trevor J Coward; Andrew J Keeling; Chris Bojke; Sue H Pavitt; Brian R Nattress
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.426

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.