Literature DB >> 29242350

NT-proBNP (N-Terminal pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide)-Guided Therapy in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: PRIMA II Randomized Controlled Trial (Can NT-ProBNP-Guided Therapy During Hospital Admission for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Reduce Mortality and Readmissions?).

Susan Stienen1, Khibar Salah1, Arno H Moons2, Adrianus L Bakx3, Petra van Pol4, R A Mikael Kortz5, João Pedro Ferreira6,7, Irene Marques8, Jutta M Schroeder-Tanka9, Jan T Keijer10, Antoni Bayés-Genis11, Jan G P Tijssen1, Yigal M Pinto1, Wouter E Kok12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept of natriuretic peptide guidance has been extensively studied in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), with only limited success. The effect of NT-proBNP (N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide)-guided therapy in patients with acute decompensated HF using a relative NT-proBNP target has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess whether NT-proBNP-guided therapy of patients with acute decompensated HF using a relative NT-proBNP target would lead to improved outcomes compared with conventional therapy.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the impact of in-hospital guidance for acute decompensated HF treatment by a predefined NT-proBNP target (>30% reduction from admission to discharge) versus conventional treatment. Patients with acute decompensated HF with NT-proBNP levels >1700 ng/L were eligible. After achieving clinical stability, 405 patients were randomized to either NT-proBNP-guided or conventional treatment (1:1). The primary end point was dual: a composite of all-cause mortality and HF readmissions in 180 days and the number of days alive out of the hospital in 180 days. Secondary end points were all-cause mortality within 180 days, HF readmissions within 180 days, and a composite of all-cause mortality and HF readmissions within 90 days.
RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the NT-proBNP-guided therapy group were discharged with an NT-proBNP reduction of >30% (80% versus 64%, P=0.001). Nonetheless, NT-proBNP-guided therapy did not significantly improve the combined event rate for all-cause mortality and HF readmissions (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.37; P=0.99) or the median number of days alive outside of the hospital (178 versus 179 days for NT-proBNP versus conventional patients, P=0.39). Guided therapy also did not significantly improve any of the secondary end points.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMA II trial (Can NT-ProBNP-Guided Therapy During Hospital Admission for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Reduce Mortality and Readmissions?) demonstrates that the guidance of HF therapy to reach an NT-proBNP reduction of >30% after clinical stabilization did not improve 6-month outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR3279.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; heart failure; hospitalization; mortality; natriuretic peptide, brain; patient readmission; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29242350     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

Review 1.  Medication dosing for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Catherine N Marti; Gregg C Fonarow; Stefan D Anker; Clyde Yancy; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Stephen J Greene; Ali Ahmed; James L Januzzi; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Javed Butler
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 2.  Congestion in heart failure: a contemporary look at physiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Eva M Boorsma; Jozine M Ter Maaten; Kevin Damman; Wilfried Dinh; Finn Gustafsson; Steven Goldsmith; Daniel Burkhoff; Faiez Zannad; James E Udelson; Adriaan A Voors
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Loop diuretic resistance complicating acute heart failure.

Authors:  Zachary L Cox; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Lack of correlation between different congestion markers in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Svenja Haag; Alexander Jobs; Thomas Stiermaier; Carlo-Federico Fichera; Christina Paitazoglou; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Applications of cardiac biomarkers in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Alexander Kula; Nisha Bansal
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Decongestion Models and Metrics in Acute Heart Failure: ESCAPE Data in the Age of the Implantable Cardiac Pressure Monitor.

Authors:  David Paniagua; Glenn N Levine; Lorraine D Cornwell; Ernesto Jimenez; Biswajit Kar; Hani Jneid; Ali E Denktas; Tony S Ma
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Validation of the ELAN-HF Score and self-care behaviour on the nurse-led heart failure clinic after admission for heart failure.

Authors:  T A M Vinck; R Deneer; Ccag Verstappen; W E Kok; K Salah; V Scharnhorst; L C Otterspoor
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 8.  Updates in heart failure 30-day readmission prevention.

Authors:  David Goldgrab; Kathir Balakumaran; Min Jung Kim; Sara R Tabtabai
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Advancements in biomarkers for cardiovascular disease: diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Wettersten; Yu Horiuchi; Alan Maisel
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 10.  The role of non-invasive devices for the telemonitoring of heart failure patients.

Authors:  A Faragli; D Abawi; C Quinn; M Cvetkovic; T Schlabs; E Tahirovic; H-D Düngen; B Pieske; S Kelle; F Edelmann; Alessio Alogna
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.