Literature DB >> 29242105

Affective and non-affective touch evoke differential brain responses in 2-month-old infants.

Emma H Jönsson1, Kalle Kotilahti2, Juha Heiskala3, Helena Backlund Wasling1, Håkan Olausson4, Ilona Croy5, Hanna Mustaniemi2, Petri Hiltunen2, Jetro J Tuulari6, Noora M Scheinin7, Linnea Karlsson8, Hasse Karlsson8, Ilkka Nissilä9.   

Abstract

Caressing touch is an effective way to communicate emotions and to create social bonds. It is also one of the key mediators of early parental bonding. The caresses are generally thought to represent a social form of touching and indeed, slow, gentle brushing is encoded in specialized peripheral nerve fibers, the C-tactile (CT) afferents. In adults, areas such as the posterior insula and superior temporal sulcus are activated by affective, slow stroking touch but not by fast stroking stimulation. However, whether these areas are activated in infants, after social tactile stimulation, is unknown. In this study, we compared the total hemoglobin responses measured with diffuse optical tomography (DOT) in the left hemisphere following slow and fast stroking touch stimulation in 16 2-month-old infants. We compared slow stroking (optimal CT afferent stimulation) to fast stroking (non-optimal CT stimulation). Activated regions were delineated using two methods: one based on contrast between the two conditions, and the other based on voxel-based statistical significance of the difference between the two conditions. The first method showed a single activation cluster in the temporal cortex with center of gravity in the middle temporal gyrus where the total hemoglobin increased after the slow stroking relative to the fast stroking (p = 0.04 uncorrected). The second method revealed a cluster in the insula with an increase in total hemoglobin in the insular cortex in response to slow stroking relative to fast stroking (p = 0.0005 uncorrected; p = 0.04 corrected for multiple comparisons). These activation clusters encompass areas that are involved in processing of affective, slow stroking touch in the adult brain. We conclude that the infant brain shows a pronounced and adult-like response to slow stroking touch compared to fast stroking touch in the insular cortex but the expected response in the primary somatosensory cortex was not found at this age. The results imply that emotionally valent touch is encoded in the brain in adult-like manner already soon after birth and this suggests a potential for involvement of touch in bonding with the caretaker.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective touch; Diffuse optical tomography (DOT); Functional near infrared spectroscopy; Infant

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29242105     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

Review 1.  The developmental support hypothesis: adaptive plasticity in neural development in response to cues of social support.

Authors:  Emilie Snell-Rood; Claire Snell-Rood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Social touch alters newborn monkey behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Sarah E Maylott; Roberto J Lazo; Kyla A Leonard; Stefano S K Kaburu; Stephen J Suomi; Annika Paukner; Pier F Ferrari
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2019-09-12

3.  The multidimensional representational space of observed socio-affective touch experiences.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Stien Van De Plas; Nicky Daniels; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Emotional Processing in the First 2 Years of Life: A Review of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Studies.

Authors:  Ambika Maria; Shashank Shekhar; Ilkka Nissilä; Kalle Kotilahti; Minna Huotilainen; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Jetro J Tuulari
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Sensitivity to CT-optimal, Affective Touch Depends on Adult Attachment Style.

Authors:  Charlotte Krahé; Mariana von Mohr; Antje Gentsch; Lisette Guy; Chiara Vari; Tobias Nolte; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Hemodynamic responses to emotional speech in two-month-old infants imaged using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Shashank Shekhar; Ambika Maria; Kalle Kotilahti; Minna Huotilainen; Juha Heiskala; Jetro J Tuulari; Pauliina Hirvi; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Ilkka Nissilä
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Infants discriminate the source of social touch at stroking speeds eliciting maximal firing rates in CT-fibers.

Authors:  Marie Aguirre; Auriane Couderc; Justine Epinat-Duclos; Olivier Mascaro
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Hand or spoon? Exploring the neural basis of affective touch in 5-month-old infants.

Authors:  L Pirazzoli; S Lloyd-Fox; R Braukmann; M H Johnson; T Gliga
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Neurobehavioral Interpersonal Synchrony in Early Development: The Role of Interactional Rhythms.

Authors:  Gabriela Markova; Trinh Nguyen; Stefanie Hoehl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-18

10.  Social touch: A new vista for developmental cognitive neuroscience?

Authors:  Teodora Gliga; Teresa Farroni; Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.