Literature DB >> 29241908

Laboratory and clinical significance of macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia.

Miro Kasum1, Slavko Orešković2, Ermin Čehić3, Martina Šunj4, Albert Lila2, Emina Ejubović3.   

Abstract

The role of macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia is currently controversial and can lead to clinical dilemmas, depending upon the origin of macroprolactin, the presence of hyperprolactinemic symptoms and monomeric prolactin (PRL) levels. Macroprolactinemia is mostly considered an extrapituitary phenomenon of mild and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia associated with normal concentrations of monomeric PRL and a predominance of macroprolactin confined to the vascular system, which is biologically inactive. Patients can therefore be reassured that macroprolactinemia should be considered a benign clinical condition, resistant to antiprolactinemic drugs, and that no diagnostic investigations or prolonged follow-up should be necessary. However, a significant proportion of macroprolactinemic patients appears to suffer from hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms and radiological pituitary findings commonly associated with true hyperprolactinemia. The symptoms of hyperprolactinemia are correlated to the levels of monomeric PRL excess, which may be explained as coincidental, by dissociation of macroprolactin, or by physiological, pharmacological and pathological causes. The excess of monomeric PRL levels in such cases is of primarily importance and the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia is misleading or inadequate. However, macroprolactinemia of pituitary origin associated with radiological findings of pituitary adenomas may rarely occur with similar hyperprolactinemic manifestations, exclusively due to bioactivity of macroprolactin. Therefore, in such cases with hyperprolactinemic signs and pituitary findings, macroprolactinemia should be considered a pathological biochemical condition of hyperprolactinemia. Accordingly, individualized diagnostic investigations with the introduction of dopamine agonists, or other treatment with prolonged follow-up, should be mandatory. The review analyses the laboratory and clinical significance of macroprolactinemia in hyperprolactinemic women suggesting clinically useful diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperprolactinemia; Macroprolactin; Macroprolactinemia; Prolactin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241908     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing laboratory defined macroprolactin algorithm.

Authors:  Milica Šostarić; Adriana Bokulić; Domagoj Marijančević; Ivana Zec
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 2.  Hyperprolactinaemia.

Authors:  Irene Samperi; Kirstie Lithgow; Niki Karavitaki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Global Prevalence of Macroprolactinemia among Patients with Hyperprolactinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Noor Azlin Azraini Che Soh; Najib Majdi Yaacob; Julia Omar; Aniza Mohammed Jelani; Noorazliyana Shafii; Tuan Salwani Tuan Ismail; Wan Norlina Wan Azman; Anis Kausar Ghazali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Prevalence of Macroprolactinemia in People Detected to Have Hyperprolactinemia.

Authors:  Lokesh Kumar Sharma; Deep Dutta; Neera Sharma; Bindu Kulshreshtha; Sandhya Lal; Ritika Sethi
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2021-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.