Literature DB >> 29241661

Glenoid component loosening associated with increased critical shoulder angle at midterm follow-up.

Jonathan P Watling1, Javier E Sanchez1, Samuel P Heilbroner1, William N Levine1, Louis U Bigliani1, Charles M Jobin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening is a common failure mode of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A larger critical shoulder angle (CSA) may cause superior glenoid component loading and more rapid component loosening. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the CSA and glenoid component loosening in midterm follow-up after TSA.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 61 primary TSAs for osteoarthritis with an average follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.2 years without surgical revision. Standard true anteroposterior radiographs postoperatively and at longest follow-up were graded in a blinded and repetitive nature for pegged glenoid radiolucent lines and measured for the CSA. An "at-risk" glenoid was defined as grade 3 or higher lucency.
RESULTS: The average CSA was 32° ± 5°, median midterm lucency grade was 2 (range, 0-5), and median progression of lucency grade was 1 (range, -1 to 4). At midterm follow-up, 20% of TSAs were grade 3 or higher mean glenoid lucency, with an average CSA of 36°. There was a statistically significant correlation between CSA and both glenoid lucency grade (odds ratio, 1.20 per degree CSA) and progression of lucency grade (odds ratio, 1.24). An increase in CSA of 10° was associated with a 6.2-fold increased odds of having an at-risk glenoid.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies the CSA as a risk factor for glenoid component loosening after TSA. Our findings suggest that the CSA may be a modifiable factor during surgery to improve glenoid component outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total shoulder arthroplasty; arthroplasty; critical shoulder angle; glenohumeral arthritis; glenoid component; loosening; radiolucent lines; shoulder radiograph

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241661     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Effect of the critical shoulder angle on severe cranialization following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Wolf; Matthias Bülhoff; Patric Raiss; Felix Zeifang; Michael W Maier
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-25

2.  Association between shoulder coracoacromial arch morphology and anterior instability of the shoulder.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Jessica Ding; Elise C Bixby; Mario H Lobao; John T Heffernan; William N Levine; Charles M Jobin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-08-21

3.  The critical shoulder angle (CSA) in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Does observer experience affect measurement reliability on plain radiographs?

Authors:  Sriram Sankaranarayanan; Benjamin R Saks; Ari J Holtzman; Eloy Tabeayo; Frances Cuomo; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-29

4.  Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure.

Authors:  Pieter C Geervliet; Jore H Willems; Inger N Sierevelt; Cornelis P J Visser; Arthur van Noort
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.