Literature DB >> 29241113

Concentrating molasses distillery wastewater using biomimetic forward osmosis (FO) membranes.

N Singh1, I Petrinic2, C Hélix-Nielsen3, S Basu4, M Balakrishnan5.   

Abstract

Treatment of sugarcane molasses distillery wastewater is challenging due to the presence of complex phenolic compounds (melanoidins and polyphenols) having antioxidant properties. Due to zero liquid discharge regulations, Indian distilleries continue to explore effective treatment options. This work examines the concentration of distillery wastewater by forward osmosis (FO) using aquaporin biomimetic membranes and magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2.6H2O) as draw solution. The operational parameters viz. feed solution and draw solution flow rate and draw solution concentration were optimized using 10% v/v melanoidins model feed solution. This was followed by trials with distillery wastewater. Under the conditions of this work, feed and draw flow rates of 1 L/min and draw solution concentration of 2M MgCl2.6H2O for melanoidins model solution and 3M MgCl2.6H2O for distillery wastewater were optimal for maximum rejection. Rejection of 90% melanoidins, 96% antioxidant activity and 84% COD was obtained with melanoidins model feed, with a corresponding water flux of 6.3 L/m2h. With as-received distillery wastewater, the rejection was similar (85-90%) to the melanoidins solution, but the water flux was lower (2.8 L/m2h). Water recovery from distillery wastewater over 24 h study period was higher with FO (70%) than reported for RO (35-45%). Repeated use of the FO membrane over five consecutive 24 h cycles with fresh feed and draw solutions and periodic cleaning showed consistent average water flux and rejection of the feed constituents.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant activity; Biomimetic aquaporin membranes; Forward osmosis (FO); Melanoidins; Molasses distillery wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241113     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  Experimental study and dynamic simulation of melanoidin adsorption from distillery effluent.

Authors:  Shoaib Ahmed; Imran Nazir Unar; Hassnain Abas Khan; Ghulamullah Maitlo; Rasool Bux Mahar; Abdul Sattar Jatoi; Abdul Qayoom Memon; Abdul Karim Shah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  State-of-the-Art and Opportunities for Forward Osmosis in Sewage Concentration and Wastewater Treatment.

Authors:  Xing Wu; Cher Hon Lau; Biplob Kumar Pramanik; Jianhua Zhang; Zongli Xie
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  Behaviour of Aquaporin Forward Osmosis Flat Sheet Membranes during the Concentration of Calcium-Containing Liquids.

Authors:  Alibek Omir; Aliya Satayeva; Aigerim Chinakulova; Arailym Kamal; Jong Kim; Vassilis J Inglezakis; Elizabeth Arkhangelsky
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22

4.  Forward Osmosis (FO) Membrane Fouling Mitigation during the Concentration of Cows' Urine.

Authors:  Mokhtar Guizani; Ryusei Ito; Takato Matsuda
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 5.  Forward Osmosis Application in Manufacturing Industries: A Short Review.

Authors:  Anita Haupt; André Lerch
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 6.  Strategies in Forward Osmosis Membrane Substrate Fabrication and Modification: A Review.

Authors:  Nur Diyana Suzaimi; Pei Sean Goh; Ahmad Fauzi Ismail; Stanley Chinedu Mamah; Nik Ahmad Nizam Nik Malek; Jun Wei Lim; Kar Chun Wong; Nidal Hilal
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07

7.  Optimization of Aquaporin Loading for Performance Enhancement of Aquaporin-Based Biomimetic Thin-Film Composite Membranes.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Xuesong Li; Jing Wei; Jaume Torres; Anthony G Fane; Rong Wang; Chuyang Y Tang
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.