Literature DB >> 29240338

Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.

.   

Abstract

This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated to non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov model, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated. Results determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and reduce treatment-related complications.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 29240338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Nurs        ISSN: 1053-816X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions.

Authors:  Jacqui A Prieto; Catherine L Murphy; Fiona Stewart; Mandy Fader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated urinary catheters for individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Min Xi; Dean S Elterman; Blayne Welk; Maureen Pakosh; Brian C F Chan
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-12-20

Review 4.  A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.

Authors:  Kim Bundvig Barken; Rikke Vaabengaard
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.