Literature DB >> 29240224

Metabolic characterization of anaerobic fungi provides a path forward for bioprocessing of crude lignocellulose.

John K Henske1, St Elmo Wilken1, Kevin V Solomon1,2, Chuck R Smallwood3, Vaithiyalingam Shutthanandan3, James E Evans3, Michael K Theodorou4, Michelle A O'Malley1.   

Abstract

The conversion of lignocellulose-rich biomass to bio-based chemicals and higher order fuels remains a grand challenge, as single-microbe approaches often cannot drive both deconstruction and chemical production steps. In contrast, consortia based bioprocessing leverages the strengths of different microbes to distribute metabolic loads and achieve process synergy, product diversity, and bolster yields. Here, we describe a biphasic fermentation scheme that combines the lignocellulolytic action of anaerobic fungi isolated from large herbivores with domesticated microbes for bioproduction. When grown in batch culture, anaerobic fungi release excess sugars from both cellulose and crude biomass due to a wealth of highly expressed carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), converting as much as 49% of cellulose to free glucose. This sugar-rich hydrolysate readily supports growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can be engineered to produce a range of value-added chemicals. Further, construction of metabolic pathways from transcriptomic data reveals that anaerobic fungi do not catabolize all sugars that their enzymes hydrolyze from biomass, leaving other carbohydrates such as galactose, arabinose, and mannose available as nutritional links to other microbes in their consortium. Although basal expression of CAZymes in anaerobic fungi is high, it is drastically amplified by cellobiose breakout products encountered during biomass hydrolysis. Overall, these results suggest that anaerobic fungi provide a nutritional benefit to the rumen microbiome, which can be harnessed to design synthetic microbial communities that compartmentalize biomass degradation and bioproduct formation.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaerobic fungi; biomass hydrolysis; bioprocessing; cellulase; sugar metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29240224     DOI: 10.1002/bit.26515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

Review 1.  From molecules to multispecies ecosystems: the roles of structure in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Vernita Gordon; Layla Bakhtiari; Kristin Kovach
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Transcriptomic characterization of Caecomyces churrovis: a novel, non-rhizoid-forming lignocellulolytic anaerobic fungus.

Authors:  John K Henske; Sean P Gilmore; Doriv Knop; Francis J Cunningham; Jessica A Sexton; Chuck R Smallwood; Vaithiyalingam Shutthanandan; James E Evans; Michael K Theodorou; Michelle A O'Malley
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Cut-Lengths of Perennial Ryegrass Leaf-Blades Influences In Vitro Fermentation by the Anaerobic Fungus Neocallimastix frontalis.

Authors:  Hugo R Jimenez; Joan E Edwards; Ruth Sanderson; Alison H Kingston-Smith; Neil R McEwan; Michael K Theodorou
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 4.  Interactions between Anaerobic Fungi and Methanogens in the Rumen and Their Biotechnological Potential in Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Materials.

Authors:  Yuqi Li; Zhenxiang Meng; Yao Xu; Qicheng Shi; Yuping Ma; Min Aung; Yanfen Cheng; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-17

5.  Cellulosome Localization Patterns Vary across Life Stages of Anaerobic Fungi.

Authors:  Stephen P Lillington; William Chrisler; Charles H Haitjema; Sean P Gilmore; Chuck R Smallwood; Vaithiyalingam Shutthanandan; James E Evans; Michelle A O'Malley
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Hydrolysis of untreated lignocellulosic feedstock is independent of S-lignin composition in newly classified anaerobic fungal isolate, Piromyces sp. UH3-1.

Authors:  Casey A Hooker; Ethan T Hillman; Jonathan C Overton; Adrian Ortiz-Velez; Makayla Schacht; Abigail Hunnicutt; Nathan S Mosier; Kevin V Solomon
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Genomic and proteomic biases inform metabolic engineering strategies for anaerobic fungi.

Authors:  St Elmo Wilken; Susanna Seppälä; Thomas S Lankiewicz; Mohan Saxena; John K Henske; Asaf A Salamov; Igor V Grigoriev; Michelle A O'Malley
Journal:  Metab Eng Commun       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 8.  Anaerobic Fungi: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Matthias Hess; Shyam S Paul; Anil K Puniya; Mark van der Giezen; Claire Shaw; Joan E Edwards; Kateřina Fliegerová
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  The Anaerobic Fungi: Challenges and Opportunities for Industrial Lignocellulosic Biofuel Production.

Authors:  Luke M G Saye; Tejas A Navaratna; James P J Chong; Michelle A O'Malley; Michael K Theodorou; Matthew Reilly
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  Proteome specialization of anaerobic fungi during ruminal degradation of recalcitrant plant fiber.

Authors:  Live H Hagen; Charles G Brooke; Claire A Shaw; Angela D Norbeck; Hailan Piao; Magnus Ø Arntzen; Heather M Olson; Alex Copeland; Nancy Isern; Anil Shukla; Simon Roux; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; Michelle A O'Malley; Igor V Grigoriev; Susannah G Tringe; Roderick I Mackie; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Phillip B Pope; Matthias Hess
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.