Literature DB >> 29240080

Reinterpretation of sequence variants: one diagnostic laboratory's experience, and the need for standard guidelines.

Caitlin Chisholm1, Hussein Daoud1, Mahdi Ghani1, Gabrielle Mettler1, Jean McGowan-Jordan1,2, Liz Sinclair-Bourque1, Amanda Smith1,2, Olga Jarinova1,2.   

Abstract

PurposeThe advent of next-generation sequencing resulted in substantial increases in the number of variants detected, interpreted, and reported by molecular genetics diagnostic laboratories. Recent publications have provided standards for the interpretation of sequence variants, but there are currently no standards regarding reinterpretation of these variants. Recognizing that significant changes in variant classification may occur over time, many genetics diagnostic laboratories have independently developed practices for variant reinterpretation. The purpose of this study is to describe our laboratory approach to variant reinterpretation.MethodsWe surveyed eight genetics diagnostic laboratories in Canada and the United States.ResultsEach laboratory had differing protocols, but most felt that clinically relevant changes to variant classifications should be communicated to ordering providers. Based on results of this survey and our experience, we developed a cost-effective and resource-efficient approach to variant reinterpretation.ConclusionOngoing variant reinterpretation is required to maintain the highest standards for delivering genetics laboratory services. Our approach to variant reinterpretation offers an efficient solution that does not compromise accuracy or timely delivery of genetics laboratory services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29240080     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  6 in total

1.  Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Gail P Jarvik; Michael C Leo; Heather M McLaughlin; Yassmine Akkari; Michelle D Amaral; Jonathan S Berg; Sawona Biswas; Kevin M Bowling; Laura K Conlin; Greg M Cooper; Michael O Dorschner; Matthew C Dulik; Arezou A Ghazani; Rajarshi Ghosh; Robert C Green; Ragan Hart; Carrie Horton; Jennifer J Johnston; Matthew S Lebo; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Jeffrey Ou; Christine M Pak; Ronak Y Patel; Sumit Punj; Carolyn Sue Richards; Joseph Salama; Natasha T Strande; Yaping Yang; Sharon E Plon; Leslie G Biesecker; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniele Carrieri; Anneke M Lucassen; Angus J Clarke; Sandi Dheensa; Shane Doheny; Peter D Turnpenny; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniele Carrieri; Sandi Dheensa; Shane Doheny; Angus J Clarke; Peter D Turnpenny; Anneke M Lucassen; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Marian A Verkerk; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Gert Matthijs; Erika Souche; Mariëlle Alders; Anniek Corveleyn; Sebastian Eck; Ilse Feenstra; Valérie Race; Erik Sistermans; Marc Sturm; Marjan Weiss; Helger Yntema; Egbert Bakker; Hans Scheffer; Peter Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.246

  6 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Robb Rowley; Marc S Williams; Dan Roden; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Carol Bult; Rex L Chisholm; Patricia A Deverka; Howard L McLeod; George A Mensah; Mary V Relling; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Cecelia Tamburro; Eric D Green
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Kyle B Brothers; Sara Fitzgerald-Butt; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Leila Jamal; Cynthia A James; Gail P Jarvik; Jennifer B McCormick; Tanya N Nelson; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Julie Richer; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Jason L Vassy; Jennifer K Wagner; Howard P Levy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Genetics: The Role of Genetics in Predicting Risk.

Authors:  Jessica Chowns; Lily Hoffman-Andrews; Amy Marzolf; Nosheen Reza; Anjali Tiku Owens
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 4.  A pediatric perspective on genomics and prevention in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Bimal P Chaudhari; Kandamurugu Manickam; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Patient perspectives on variant reclassification after cancer susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Colin M E Halverson; Laurie M Connors; Bronson C Wessinger; Ellen W Clayton; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  Reinterpretation, reclassification, and its downstream effects: challenges for clinical laboratory geneticists.

Authors:  Julia El Mecky; Lennart Johansson; Mirjam Plantinga; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Annemieke van der Hout; Kate Lyle; Irene van Langen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Genetic testing offer for inherited neuromuscular diseases within the EURO-NMD reference network: A European survey study.

Authors:  Borut Peterlin; Francesca Gualandi; Ales Maver; Serenella Servidei; Silvère M van der Maarel; Francoise Lamy; Alexander Mejat; Teresinha Evangelista; Alessandra Ferlini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  iVar, an Interpretation-Oriented Tool to Manage the Update and Revision of Variant Annotation and Classification.

Authors:  Sara Castellano; Federica Cestari; Giovanni Faglioni; Elena Tenedini; Marco Marino; Lucia Artuso; Rossella Manfredini; Mario Luppi; Tommaso Trenti; Enrico Tagliafico
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.