BACKGROUND: Spodoptera frugiperda is a pest of economically important crops in South America. In Brazil, this species is considered the most destructive pest of maize. Use of spinosyn insecticides in insect resistance management (IRM) has been one strategy to control this pest. In this study, we selected a strain of S. frugiperda resistant to spinosad and evaluated the inheritance and fitness costs of the resistance. RESULTS: Estimated LC50 (concentration required to kill 50% of larvae) values were 0.011 and 9.80 µg cm-2 for the spinosad-susceptible (Sus) and -resistant (Spin-res) strains, respectively. This represents an 890-fold resistance ratio. LC50 values for reciprocal crosses were 0.18 and 0.14 µg cm-2 , indicating that resistance to spinosad is an autosomal incompletely recessive trait. Backcrosses of the F1 progeny from reciprocal crosses with the parental Spin-res strain showed a polygenic effect. The estimated minimum number of independent segregations was ∼ 2.45, indicating that resistance to spinosad is associated with multiple genes. In greenhouse assays, third-instar larvae from the Spin-res strain showed >92% survival on spinosad-treated maize. By contrast Sus and reciprocal crosses exhibited 0% and <5% survival, respectively, indicating that resistance is recessive. Life history studies to investigate the fitness cost of resistance revealed a 41% reduction in the rate of survival to adulthood and a 49% lower reproductive rate in the Spin-res strain compared with the Sus strain. CONCLUSIONS: The autosomal, incompletely recessive and polygenic resistance to spinosad in S. frugiperda and the fitness costs associated with this resistance can be exploited in IRM strategies to preserve the lifetime of spinosad for control of S. frugiperda in Brazil.
BACKGROUND:Spodoptera frugiperda is a pest of economically important crops in South America. In Brazil, this species is considered the most destructive pest of maize. Use of spinosyn insecticides in insect resistance management (IRM) has been one strategy to control this pest. In this study, we selected a strain of S. frugiperda resistant to spinosad and evaluated the inheritance and fitness costs of the resistance. RESULTS: Estimated LC50 (concentration required to kill 50% of larvae) values were 0.011 and 9.80 µg cm-2 for the spinosad-susceptible (Sus) and -resistant (Spin-res) strains, respectively. This represents an 890-fold resistance ratio. LC50 values for reciprocal crosses were 0.18 and 0.14 µg cm-2 , indicating that resistance to spinosad is an autosomal incompletely recessive trait. Backcrosses of the F1 progeny from reciprocal crosses with the parental Spin-res strain showed a polygenic effect. The estimated minimum number of independent segregations was ∼ 2.45, indicating that resistance to spinosad is associated with multiple genes. In greenhouse assays, third-instar larvae from the Spin-res strain showed >92% survival on spinosad-treated maize. By contrast Sus and reciprocal crosses exhibited 0% and <5% survival, respectively, indicating that resistance is recessive. Life history studies to investigate the fitness cost of resistance revealed a 41% reduction in the rate of survival to adulthood and a 49% lower reproductive rate in the Spin-res strain compared with the Sus strain. CONCLUSIONS: The autosomal, incompletely recessive and polygenic resistance to spinosad in S. frugiperda and the fitness costs associated with this resistance can be exploited in IRM strategies to preserve the lifetime of spinosad for control of S. frugiperda in Brazil.
Authors: Priscila Stinguel; Carlos Eduardo Costa Paiva; Vitor Zuim; Ana Clara Thezolin Azevedo; Fernando Hercos Valicente; Hugo José Gonçalves Dos Santos Júnior Journal: Neotrop Entomol Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 1.434
Authors: Boddupalli M Prasanna; Anani Bruce; Yoseph Beyene; Dan Makumbi; Manje Gowda; Muhammad Asim; Samuel Martinelli; Graham P Head; Srinivas Parimi Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Renato J Horikoshi; Patrick M Dourado; Geraldo U Berger; Davi de S Fernandes; Celso Omoto; Alan Willse; Samuel Martinelli; Graham P Head; Alberto S Corrêa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 4.379