Literature DB >> 29239024

Concordance between administrative data and clinical review for mortality in the randomized on/off bypass follow-up study (ROOBY-FS).

Jacquelyn A Quin1,2, Brack Hattler3,4, Annie Laurie W Shroyer5,6, Darlene Kemp7, G Hossein Almassi8,9, Faisal G Bakaeen10,11, Brendan M Carr12,13, Muath Bishawi12,14, Joseph F Collins7, Frederick L Grover4,15, Todd H Wagner16,17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal methodology to identify cardiac versus non-cardiac cause of death following cardiac surgery has not been determined.
METHODS: The Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of 2203 patients (February 2002-May 2008) comparing 1-year cardiac outcomes between off-pump and on-pump bypass surgery. In 2013, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program funded a follow-up study to assess 5-year outcomes including mortality. Deaths were identified and confirmed using the National Death Index (NDI), VA Vital Status file, and medical records. An Endpoints Committee (EC) reviewed patient medical records and classified each cause of death as cardiac, non-cardiac, or unknown. Using pre-determined ICD-10 codes, NDI death certificates were independently used to classify deaths as cardiac or non-cardiac. Cause of death was compared between the NDI and EC classifications and concordance measured, using Kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Of the 297 5-year deaths identified by the NDI and/or VA vital status file and confirmed by the EC, 219 had adequate patient records for EC cause of death determination. The EC adjudicated 141 of these deaths as non-cardiac and 78 as cardiac, while the NDI classified 150 as non-cardiac and 69 as cardiac; agreement was 77.6% (kappa 0.500; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Since concordance between EC and NDI cause of death classifications was only moderate, caution should be exercised in relying exclusively on NDI data to determine cause of death. A hybrid approach, integrating multiple information sources, may provide the most accurate approach to classifying cause of death.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29239024     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  2 in total

1.  Bias Implications of Outcome Misclassification in Observational Studies Evaluating Association Between Treatments and All-Cause or Cardiovascular Mortality Using Administrative Claims.

Authors:  Rishi J Desai; Raisa Levin; Kueiyu Joshua Lin; Elisabetta Patorno
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Clinical trials proposed for the VA Cooperative Studies Program: Success rates and factors impacting approval.

Authors:  David R Burnaska; Grant D Huang; Timothy J O'Leary
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-07-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.