Jennifer Hah1, Sean C Mackey1, Peter Schmidt2, Rebecca McCue2, Keith Humphreys3, Jodie Trafton3,4, Bradley Efron5, Debra Clay2, Yasamin Sharifzadeh2, Gabriela Ruchelli2, Stuart Goodman6,7, James Huddleston6, William J Maloney6, Frederick M Dirbas8, Joseph Shrager9, John G Costouros6, Catherine Curtin10, Ian Carroll1. 1. Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 2. Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 3. Center for Healthcare Evaluation, Veterans Health Administration, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 4. Veterans Administration Program Evaluation and Resource Center, Veterans Health Administration Office of Mental Health Operations, Menlo Park, California. 5. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 7. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 8. Department of General Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 9. Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 10. Division of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines recommend using gabapentin to decrease postoperative pain and opioid use, but significant variation exists in clinical practice. Objective: To determine the effect of perioperative gabapentin on remote postoperative time to pain resolution and opioid cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of perioperative gabapentin was conducted at a single-center, tertiary referral teaching hospital. A total of 1805 patients aged 18 to 75 years scheduled for surgery (thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, mastectomy, breast lumpectomy, hand surgery, carpal tunnel surgery, knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroplasty, and shoulder arthroscopy) were screened. Participants were enrolled from May 25, 2010, to July 25, 2014, and followed up for 2 years postoperatively. Intention-to-treat analysis was used in evaluation of the findings. Interventions: Gabapentin, 1200 mg, preoperatively and 600 mg, 3 times a day postoperatively or active placebo (lorazepam, 0.5 mg) preoperatively followed by inactive placebo postoperatively for 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to pain resolution (5 consecutive reports of 0 of 10 possible levels of average pain at the surgical site on the numeric rating scale of pain). Secondary outcomes were time to opioid cessation (5 consecutive reports of no opioid use) and the proportion of participants with continued pain or opioid use at 6 months and 1 year. Results: Of 1805 patients screened for enrollment, 1383 were excluded, including 926 who did not meet inclusion criteria and 273 who declined to participate. Overall, 8% of patients randomized were lost to follow-up. A total of 202 patients were randomized to active placebo and 208 patients were randomized to gabapentin in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 56.7 [11.7] years; 256 (62.4%) women and 154 (37.6%) men). Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. Perioperative gabapentin did not affect time to pain cessation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82-1.33; P = .73) in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, participants receiving gabapentin had a 24% increase in the rate of opioid cessation after surgery (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00-1.54; P = .05). No significant differences were noted in the number of adverse events as well as the rate of medication discontinuation due to sedation or dizziness (placebo, 42 of 202 [20.8%]; gabapentin, 52 of 208 [25.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Perioperative administration of gabapentin had no effect on postoperative pain resolution, but it had a modest effect on promoting opioid cessation after surgery. The routine use of perioperative gabapentin may be warranted to promote opioid cessation and prevent chronic opioid use. Optimal dosing and timing of perioperative gabapentin in the context of specific operations to decrease opioid use should be addressed in further research. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01067144.
Importance: Guidelines recommend using gabapentin to decrease postoperative pain and opioid use, but significant variation exists in clinical practice. Objective: To determine the effect of perioperative gabapentin on remote postoperative time to pain resolution and opioid cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of perioperative gabapentin was conducted at a single-center, tertiary referral teaching hospital. A total of 1805 patients aged 18 to 75 years scheduled for surgery (thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, mastectomy, breast lumpectomy, hand surgery, carpal tunnel surgery, knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroplasty, and shoulder arthroscopy) were screened. Participants were enrolled from May 25, 2010, to July 25, 2014, and followed up for 2 years postoperatively. Intention-to-treat analysis was used in evaluation of the findings. Interventions: Gabapentin, 1200 mg, preoperatively and 600 mg, 3 times a day postoperatively or active placebo (lorazepam, 0.5 mg) preoperatively followed by inactive placebo postoperatively for 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to pain resolution (5 consecutive reports of 0 of 10 possible levels of average pain at the surgical site on the numeric rating scale of pain). Secondary outcomes were time to opioid cessation (5 consecutive reports of no opioid use) and the proportion of participants with continued pain or opioid use at 6 months and 1 year. Results: Of 1805 patients screened for enrollment, 1383 were excluded, including 926 who did not meet inclusion criteria and 273 who declined to participate. Overall, 8% of patients randomized were lost to follow-up. A total of 202 patients were randomized to active placebo and 208 patients were randomized to gabapentin in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 56.7 [11.7] years; 256 (62.4%) women and 154 (37.6%) men). Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. Perioperative gabapentin did not affect time to pain cessation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82-1.33; P = .73) in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, participants receiving gabapentin had a 24% increase in the rate of opioid cessation after surgery (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00-1.54; P = .05). No significant differences were noted in the number of adverse events as well as the rate of medication discontinuation due to sedation or dizziness (placebo, 42 of 202 [20.8%]; gabapentin, 52 of 208 [25.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Perioperative administration of gabapentin had no effect on postoperative pain resolution, but it had a modest effect on promoting opioid cessation after surgery. The routine use of perioperative gabapentin may be warranted to promote opioid cessation and prevent chronic opioid use. Optimal dosing and timing of perioperative gabapentin in the context of specific operations to decrease opioid use should be addressed in further research. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01067144.
Authors: Xueying Jiang; Margaret Orton; Rui Feng; Erik Hossain; Neil R Malhotra; Eric L Zager; Renyu Liu Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Debra B Gordon; Oscar A de Leon-Casasola; Christopher L Wu; Kathleen A Sluka; Timothy J Brennan; Roger Chou Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Shepard P Johnson; Kevin C Chung; Lin Zhong; Melissa J Shauver; Michael J Engelsbe; Chad Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Karim S Ladha; Elisabetta Patorno; Krista F Huybrechts; Jun Liu; James P Rathmell; Brian T Bateman Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: John A Harvin; Rondel Albarado; Van Thi Thanh Truong; Charles Green; Jon E Tyson; Claudia Pedroza; Charles E Wade; Lillian S Kao Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sean M Stokes; Elliot Wakeam; Mara B Antonoff; Leah M Backhus; Robert A Meguid; David Odell; Thomas K Varghese Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Christopher L Wu; Adam B King; Timothy M Geiger; Michael C Grant; Michael P W Grocott; Ruchir Gupta; Jennifer M Hah; Timothy E Miller; Andrew D Shaw; Tong J Gan; Julie K M Thacker; Michael G Mythen; Matthew D McEvoy Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Jessica I Billig; Erika D Sears; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Katherine B Santosa; Theodore J Iwashyna; Michael J Englesbe; Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 2.230