Krista F Huybrechts1, Gabriella Bröms2, Lotte Brix Christensen3, Kristjana Einarsdóttir4,5, Anders Engeland6,7, Kari Furu6, Mika Gissler8,9,10, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz11, Pär Karlsson2, Øystein Karlstad6, Helle Kieler2, Anna-Maria Lahesmaa-Korpinen8, Helen Mogun1, Mette Nørgaard3, Johan Reutfors2, Henrik Toft Sørensen3, Helga Zoega5,12, Brian T Bateman1,13. 1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Unit for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 5. Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 6. Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 7. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 8. Information Services Department, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 9. Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 10. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 11. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 12. Medicines Policy Research Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 13. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Given the rapidly increasing use of stimulant medications during pregnancy and among women of reproductive age who may become pregnant inadvertently, there is a need to better understand their safety. Objective: To examine the risk of congenital malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to stimulants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study of the Medicaid-insured population in the United States nested in the 2000-2013 US Medicaid Analytic eXtract, with follow-up of safety signals detected in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract data using the Nordic Health registries (2003-2013) (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). A total of 1 813 894 publicly insured pregnancies in the United States and 2 560 069 singleton pregnancies in the 5 Nordic countries ending in live births were included. Relative risks were estimated accounting for underlying psychiatric disorders and other potential confounders. Relative risk estimates for the US and Nordic data were pooled using a fixed-effects meta-analytic approach. The study was conducted from July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017. Exposures: Methylphenidate and amphetamines dispensed during the first trimester. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major congenital malformations and subgroup of cardiac malformations. Results: In the US data, of the 1 813 894 pregnancies evaluated, 35.0 per 1000 infants not exposed to stimulants were diagnosed as having congenital malformations, compared with 45.9 per 1000 infants for methylphenidate and 45.4 for amphetamines. For cardiac malformations, the risks were 12.7 (95% CI, 12.6-12.9), 18.8 (95% CI, 13.8-25.6), and 15.4 (95% CI, 12.5-19.0) per 1000 infants, respectively. The adjusted relative risks for methylphenidate were 1.11 (95% CI, 0.91-1.35) for any malformation and 1.28 (95% CI, 0.94-1.74) for cardiac malformations. No increased risks were observed for amphetamines: 1.05 (95% CI, 0.93-1.19) for any malformations and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.78-1.19) for cardiac malformations. Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses accounting for proxies of unmeasured confounders and increasing the specificity of the exposure and outcome definitions. Replication of the analyses for methylphenidate using the Nordic data including 2 560 069 pregnancies yielded a relative risk of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.83-1.97) for cardiac malformations, resulting in a pooled estimate of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.00-1.64). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a small increase in the risk of cardiac malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to methylphenidate but not to amphetamines. This information is important when weighing the risks and benefits of alternative treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in women of reproductive age and during early pregnancy.
Importance: Given the rapidly increasing use of stimulant medications during pregnancy and among women of reproductive age who may become pregnant inadvertently, there is a need to better understand their safety. Objective: To examine the risk of congenital malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to stimulants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study of the Medicaid-insured population in the United States nested in the 2000-2013 US Medicaid Analytic eXtract, with follow-up of safety signals detected in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract data using the Nordic Health registries (2003-2013) (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). A total of 1 813 894 publicly insured pregnancies in the United States and 2 560 069 singleton pregnancies in the 5 Nordic countries ending in live births were included. Relative risks were estimated accounting for underlying psychiatric disorders and other potential confounders. Relative risk estimates for the US and Nordic data were pooled using a fixed-effects meta-analytic approach. The study was conducted from July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017. Exposures: Methylphenidate and amphetamines dispensed during the first trimester. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major congenital malformations and subgroup of cardiac malformations. Results: In the US data, of the 1 813 894 pregnancies evaluated, 35.0 per 1000 infants not exposed to stimulants were diagnosed as having congenital malformations, compared with 45.9 per 1000 infants for methylphenidate and 45.4 for amphetamines. For cardiac malformations, the risks were 12.7 (95% CI, 12.6-12.9), 18.8 (95% CI, 13.8-25.6), and 15.4 (95% CI, 12.5-19.0) per 1000 infants, respectively. The adjusted relative risks for methylphenidate were 1.11 (95% CI, 0.91-1.35) for any malformation and 1.28 (95% CI, 0.94-1.74) for cardiac malformations. No increased risks were observed for amphetamines: 1.05 (95% CI, 0.93-1.19) for any malformations and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.78-1.19) for cardiac malformations. Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses accounting for proxies of unmeasured confounders and increasing the specificity of the exposure and outcome definitions. Replication of the analyses for methylphenidate using the Nordic data including 2 560 069 pregnancies yielded a relative risk of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.83-1.97) for cardiac malformations, resulting in a pooled estimate of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.00-1.64). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a small increase in the risk of cardiac malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to methylphenidate but not to amphetamines. This information is important when weighing the risks and benefits of alternative treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in women of reproductive age and during early pregnancy.
Authors: Guilherme V Polanczyk; Giovanni A Salum; Luisa S Sugaya; Arthur Caye; Luis A Rohde Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Steve K Teo; David I Stirling; Alan M Hoberman; Mildred S Christian; Steve D Thomas; Vikram D Khetani Journal: Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol Date: 2003-04
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Michael A Fischer; Ellen W Seely; Jeffrey L Ecker; Jessica M Franklin; Rishi J Desai; Cora Allen-Coleman; Helen Mogun; Jerry Avorn; Krista F Huybrechts Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-03-17
Authors: Kayla N Anderson; Annelise C Dutton; Cheryl S Broussard; Sherry L Farr; Jennifer N Lind; Susanna N Visser; Elizabeth C Ailes; Stuart K Shapira; Jennita Reefhuis; Sarah C Tinker Journal: J Atten Disord Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 3.256
Authors: Lindsay K Admon; Gavin Bart; Katy B Kozhimannil; Caroline R Richardson; Vanessa K Dalton; Tyler N A Winkelman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Uffe Heide-Jørgensen; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Anders Engeland; Kari Furu; Mika Gissler; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Helle Kieler; Anna-Maria Lahesmaa-Korpinen; Helen Mogun; Mette Nørgaard; Johan Reutfors; Randi Selmer; Krista F Huybrechts; Helga Zoega Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lin Li; Ayesha C Sujan; Agnieszka Butwicka; Zheng Chang; Samuele Cortese; Patrick Quinn; Alexander Viktorin; A Sara Öberg; Brian M D'Onofrio; Henrik Larsson Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.749