Literature DB >> 29238716

Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis in Tunisia: A Retrospective Study over 11 Years.

Nedia Ben Achour1,2, Ibtihel Rebai1, Sarra Raddadi1, Hanene Benrhouma1,2, Hedia Klaa1,2, Aida Rouissi1, Ichraf Kraoua1,2, Ilhem Ben Youssef Turki1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a rare demyelinating disorder with an onset before the age of 18 years. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of pMS in Tunisian children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study over 11 years (2005-2016) including all patients diagnosed with pMS according to the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG) criteria of 2012 and followed up in a tertiary care research center. Epidemiological, clinical, neuroimaging, laboratory, and therapeutic data were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 21 patients. The male-female ratio was 1 : 3. Mean age at onset was 11 years (range: 3-17 years). Three patients had type 1 diabetes. Polyfocal presentation was preponderant (81%) with motor dysfunction in 57% of patients. Paroxysmal dystonia was noticed in 24%. All patients were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting form. Interferon beta was prescribed in 80% with a reduction of annual relapse rate.
CONCLUSION: The annual incidence of pMS in Tunisian children aged below 18 years could be estimated as 0.05 per 100,000. Singular features in our cohort were the frequent association with type 1 diabetes and the increased occurrence of dystonia. Greater awareness of pMS may be helpful to improve management strategies of children and their families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29238716      PMCID: PMC5697413          DOI: 10.1155/2017/4354826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Pediatric multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a rare demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system defined by an onset before the age of 18 years. Diagnosis was based historically on the adult's criteria and children were treated using adult paradigms. It is recognised as multifactorial disease, caused by genetic vulnerability and environmental triggers that are still investigated [1]. In Tunisia, there are no accurate pMS epidemiological data. In this study, we aimed to investigate demographic characteristics, clinical features, biological and radiological aspects, management, and outcome of Tunisian children with pMS.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Setting

We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study over 11 years (between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2016) in the Department of Child and Adolescent Neurology at the National Institute Mongi Ben Hmida of Neurology (Tunis, Tunisia). The total population of our country (2005–2016) is 10618933 ± 399773, with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 10.618.863–10.619.002. The pediatric population aged below 18 years (2005–2016) accounts for 3.490.333 ± 62128, with 95% CI of 3.490.314–3.490.352. Our department is a referral tertiary care and research center for children and adolescents with neurological disorders from the whole country and serves a population of over three million people (aged below 18 years). More detailed information about demographics of Tunisia and presentation of our center is provided in Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4354826.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

All patients managed in our department for acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) have been retrospectively reviewed. We included in our study all patients who fulfilled the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group's (IPMSSG) revised criteria (2012) [2] for pMS with a minimum follow-up period > 6 months.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

All patients with genetic leukoencephalopathies and demyelinating disorders such as leukodystrophies, aminoacidurias, and mitochondriopathies have been excluded. Patients who presented with acquired demyelinating disorders mimicking MS and whose final diagnoses were infectious, vascular, nutritional (B12 or folate deficiency), or inflammatory disorders (systemic lupus erythematosus, neurosarcoidosis, neuro-Behçet, Sjogren's syndrome,…) have been excluded based on neuroimaging findings and biological and immunological tests. We excluded also all patients with other ADS (CIS, NMO, ADEM,…) who did not fulfill the MS criteria.

2.4. Procedures

Medical records of patients with pMS were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at first consultation and at the last one, biological findings, characteristics of the first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the data about therapeutic management and outcome were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed using SPSS software. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

3. Results

Among 47 patients with ADS, 21 patients fulfilled the diagnosis criteria for pMS and were included in our study. The male-female ratio was 1 : 3. Sixteen patients (76%) originated from northern regions, three from the center (14%), and two from southern regions (10%). Mean age at onset was 11 years (range: 3–17 years). Time between the first symptom and the diagnosis of MS varied between 1 day and 2 years. Medical history corresponded to type 1 diabetes in three cases (10%) and hypothyroidism, factor 7 deficiency, allergic rhinitis, neonatal jaundice, and hyperpyretic seizures in one case, respectively (4%). First onset symptoms occurred in winter and in summer in six patients (28%), respectively, in autumn in five (23%) cases, and in spring in four cases (19%). The mean follow-up period was three years (ranging from 6 months to 8 years). Polyfocal presentation was noticed in 17 patients (81%), whereas monofocal presentation was present in 4 patients (19%). The most preponderant clinical manifestations were motor dysfunction in 12 patients (57%), ataxia and brainstem symptoms in 10 patients (48%), respectively, and sensory dysfunction in 8 patients (38%). Optic neuritis was documented on visual evoked potentials in 13 patients (62%). Five patients (24%) had movement disorders as paroxysmal dystonia. An acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis- (ADEM-) like presentation was noticed in one patient (5%). Demographic and clinical data were presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical findings in our series.

Gender Age of onset (years)Family historyMedical historyInaugural symptomsClinical manifestations on first attack, EDSS score
Patient 1F17GoitreNoneDysarthria + weakness of lower limbs + numbness in upper limbsThermic hyperesthesia + tactile hypoesthesia + upper limb dystonia + cerebellar ataxia. EDSS = 3.5

Patient 2F16EpilepsyAllergic rhinitisFacial paralysis + diplopia + dizziness6th nerve paralysis + tetrapyramidal syndrome + vestibular syndrome + cerebellar ataxia. EDSS = 3

Patient 3F3NoneNoneDysarthria + gait disorderDysarthria + static and kinetic cerebellar syndrome. EDSS = 3

Patient 4M10NoneNoneSeizures + altered consciousness + gait disorder + decreased vision + vomitingDysarthria + dystonia + cerebellar syndrome + proprioceptive dysfunction + nystagmus + 7th nerve paralysis + decreased vision. EDSS = 2

Patient 5F17NoneType 1 diabetesDecreased vision + sphincter dysfunction + weakness and numbness of lower limbsParaparesis + pyramidal syndrome + cerebellar syndrome + proprioceptive dysfunction. EDSS = 4.5

Patient 6M10NoneType 1 diabetesRight hemibody weakness + paresthesiaRight hemiplegia. EDSS = 5

Patient 7F17Bipolar disorderNoneLeft hemibody weakness + paresthesiaLeft hemiparesis + tactile and pain sensory dysfunction. EDSS = 3.5

Patient 8M4NoneAsthmaHeadache + left hemibody weakness + hand movement disorder + vomitingLeft hemiparesis + central facial paralysis + hand dystonia. EDSS = 3.5

Patient 9F16NoneNoneLeft upper limb weakness + paresthesiaLeft pyramidal syndrome + hemibody hypoesthesia + sensory level C4. EDSS = 2

Patient 10F14NoneNoneDizziness + cervical movement disorder + vomitingCervical dystonia + pyramidal syndrome + vestibular syndrome + paraparesis. EDSS = 4

Patient 11M12NoneNoneDizziness + vomiting + diplopiaVestibular syndrome + pyramidal syndrome. EDSS = 1.5

Patient 12F15NoneNoneTremor of upper limbs + convergent strabismus + diplopia + urinary dysfunctionDysarthria + right convergent strabismus + nystagmus + cerebellar syndrome. EDSS = 2

Patient 13F7NoneNoneGait disorder + hand movement disorderDystonia + myoclonus + tremor. EDSS = 3

Patient 14F17NoneHypothyroidismLower limb weakness + hemibody paresthesia + facial paralysis + hand movement disorderSpastic paraparesis + pyramidal syndrome + hemibody hypoesthesia. EDSS = 3

Patient 15M4.5NoneNoneHemibody weakness + facial paralysisRight hemiparesis. EDSS = 2

Patient 16F12NoneNoneStrabismus + facial paralysis + gait disorder + diplopia + dizziness + swallowing difficultiesPseudobulbar syndrome + proprioceptive dysfunction. EDSS = 6

Patient 17F17NoneNoneFour limbs weakness + paresthesiaLeft lower limb paresis + thermic and pain sensory dysfunction + proprioceptive dysfunction. EDSS = 4.5

Patient 18F16NoneNoneParesthesia + tremor + facial paralysis + lower limb weaknessRight hemiparesis + tremor + kinetic cerebellar syndrome + pyramidal syndrome. EDSS = 2,5

Patient 19F4NoneNoneDysarthria + hemibody weaknessSpasmodic laughter and weeping + dysarthria + tetraparesis + cerebellar syndrome. EDSS = 4,5

Patient 20F8NoneNoneLeft hemibody weaknessLeft hemiparesis. EDSS = 2

Patient 21F13NoneType 1 diabetesParesthesia + hemibody weaknessFlaccid paraparesis + sensory level D3. EDSS = 4

EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; F: female; M: male.

On their first MRI, all patients showed increased signal on FLAIR and T2 weighted images (Figure 1) with supratentorial lesions in all cases (100%) and infratentorial involvement in 17 cases (81%). Black holes corresponding to hypointense lesions on T1 weighted images were present in all cases reflecting the axonal injury. Spinal involvement was noticed in 11 cases (52%) with cervical location in 6 cases (29%). Eighteen patients (86%) had gadolinium enhancement on T1 weighted images revealing active inflammatory lesions.
Figure 1

Axial FLAIR weighted images ((a) and (b)) showing multiple hyperintense lesions on periventricular and subcortical regions in patient 5 with spinal dorsal involvement on sagittal T2 weighted image (c).

CSF analysis was performed in 20 patients (95%). On their first lumbar puncture, only 8 patients (38%) showed positive oligoclonal bands (OCB). An increased CSF cell count (less than 30 lymphocytes/mm3) has been noticed in 5 cases (25%). Patients with negative OCB and/or increased cell count had a second lumbar puncture which revealed positive OCB in 85%. Detailed neuroimaging and laboratory data were presented in Table 2.
Table 2

CSF analysis and neuroimaging findings in our series.

CSF analysis(at onset)Repeat CSF analysisBrain and spinal MRINeurophysiological studies
Patient 1Positive OCBPeriventricular, subcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with right thalamus and pontine involvement and gadolinium enhancementNormal VEP

Patient 2Positive OCB, increased protein levelBrainstem, cerebellar, and insular subcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images without gadolinium enhancementOptic neuritis

Patient 3NormalPositive OCBPeriventricular, subcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with brainstem and cerebellar involvementOptic neuritis

Patient 4Negative OCB, increased protein levelPositive OCBSubcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with basal ganglia, brainstem, and posterior cordonal involvementOptic neuritis

Patient 5Positive OCB, increased protein levelPeriventricular and subcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with internal capsule, corpus callosum, thalamic, brainstem, and cerebellar peduncle involvement, extensive posterior spinal abnormalities, and gadolinium enhancement (Figure 1)Optic neuritis, altered BAEP and SEP

Patient 6NormalPositive OCBPeriventricular and subcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with brainstem and cervical involvement without gadolinium enhancementAltered BAEP

Patient 7Negative OCB, increased protein levelNormalPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with “onion bulb” appearance of one lesion and gadolinium enhancementAltered BAEP

Patient 8NormalPositive OCBPeriventricular and semiovale center hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with internal capsule involvementAltered SEP

Patient 9Negative OCB, increased protein levelPositive OCBSubcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cervical involvement and gadolinium enhancementAltered SEP

Patient 10Positive OCBPeriventricular, subcortical, semiovale center hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with corpus callosum, peduncular, pontine, and cerebellar involvement and cervical and dorsal abnormalitiesNot performed

Patient 11Increased cell countNormalPeriventricular, subcortical, semiovale center hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with corpus callosum and cerebellar peduncles involvement and gadolinium enhancementNormal VEP

Patient 12NormalPositive OCBCorpus callosum hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cerebellar and brainstem involvement and cervical abnormalities with gadolinium enhancementOptic neuritis

Patient 13Increased cell countNormalPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cervical involvementOptic neuritis

Patient 14Positive OCB, increased protein level and cell countPositive OCB with normal cell countPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cervical involvement and gadolinium enhancementOptic neuritis, altered SEP

Patient 15Increased cell count Positive OCB with normal cell countPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted imagesNormal VEP

Patient 16NormalPositive OCBPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cerebellar and brainstem involvementNot performed

Patient 17NormalPositive OCBPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cervical involvementOptic neuritis, altered SEP

Patient 18Positive OCBPeriventricular and semiovale center hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with corpus callosum, brainstem, and cerebellar involvementOptic neuritis, altered SEP

Patient 19Positive OCB, increased protein level and cell countPositive OCB with normal cell countPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with brainstem involvementBilateral optic neuritis

Patient 20Not performedPeriventricular hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with “onion bulb” aspect of some lesionsOptic neuritis, altered SEP

Patient 21Positive OCB and increased protein levelSubcortical hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR weighted images with cerebellar, cervical, and dorsal involvementAltered SEP

OCB: oligoclonal bands; BAEP: brain auditory evoked potentials; SEP: sensory evoked potentials; VEP: visual evoked potentials.

In order to exclude differential diagnosis of MS, all our patients (especially those with increased CSF protein and cell count) had serum and CSF screening for HSV, EBV, VZV, CMV, HIV, rubella virus, hepatitis B and C, mycoplasma, West Nile, HIV, Lyme, and syphilis and showed no argument for recent infection. Immunological tests (antinuclear, antirheumatoid factor and anti-Sm antibodies) and angiotensin-converting enzyme showed normal results in all patients. Patients with movement disorders had a screening for Wilson's disease (serum ceruloplasmin test; serum and urine copper tests) and mitochondriopathy (lactate in serum and CSF) and some patients had screening for NMDA antibodies and streptolysin O antibodies. Children with a very early onset (patients 3, 8, 15, and 19) had assessment of ammonia, lactate (serum and CSF), amino acid, and urine organic acid chromatography. All these biological investigations showed normal results. Other biological investigations were performed and aimed to evaluate risk factors for MS. They mainly included measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D) levels performed in 9 patients. The levels indicated a deficiency state (defined as 25(OH)D levels less than 10 ng/ml) in 6 patients with a lowest rate of 6 ng/ml. Vitamin D insufficiency (defined as 25(OH)D levels between 10 and 20 ng/ml) was found in one patient (18.8 ng/ml). All patients had been diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Seventeen patients enrolled in the study underwent immunomodulatory therapy with interferon β 1a in 15 cases and interferon β 1b in two cases. The EDSS score was 3 at the onset (range: 1.5–6) and 1 at the last evaluation (range: 0–3.5). The median annual relapse rate before and after immunomodulatory therapy was, respectively, 2 (range: 0.25–4) versus 0.42 (range: 0–1.33). Only one patient developed a secondary progressive form. Therapeutic and follow-up data were presented in Table 3.
Table 3

Therapeutic management and follow-up data in our series.

Immunomodulatory treatmentMS formRelapse rate before immunomodulatory treatment (per year)Relapse rate after immunomodulatory treatment (per year) and EDSS score
Patient 1Interferon β 1aRRMS20, EDSS = 1
Patient 2Interferon β 1aRRMS11, EDSS = 1
Patient 3Interferon β 1aRRMS20, EDSS = 1.5
Patient 4Interferon β 1aRRMS10, EDSS = 1
Patient 5Interferon β 1aRRMS51.33, EDSS = 1
Patient 6Interferon β 1bRRMS10, EDSS = 0
Patient 7 Interferon β 1aRRMS0,50, EDSS = 1
Patient 8Interferon β 1aRRMS30.3, EDSS = 1
Patient 9Interferon β 1aRRMS30.6, EDSS = 1
Patient 10NoneRRMS—, EDSS = 0.5
Patient 11NoneRRMS—, EDSS = 0.5
Patient 12Interferon β 1aRRMS20.33, EDSS = 2
Patient 13NoneRRMS—, EDSS = 1
Patient 14Interferon β 1bRRMS21, EDSS = 1
Patient 15Interferon β 1aRRMS40.2, EDSS = 1
Patient 16Interferon β 1aRRMS10.3, EDSS = 1.5
Patient 17Interferon β 1bRRMS21, EDSS = 1
Patient 18Interferon β 1aRRMS41, EDSS = 1.5
Patient 19Interferon β 1a switched with interferon β 1bRRMS then SPMS0.250, EDSS = 3.5
Patient 20NoneRRMS—, EDSS = 1
Patient 21Interferon β 1aRRMS10.2, EDSS = 1

RRMS: relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS: secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

4. Discussion

Our study provides demographic, clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics, management, and outcome of pMS in Tunisia over 11 years. Annual incidence of pMS per 100,000 children varies across studies and countries. It has been estimated to be 0.13 in France, 0.18 in Canada, and 0.51 in USA and increased to 2.85 in Sardinia (Italy) [1, 3, 4]. In Tunisia, there are no accurate pMS epidemiological data. Given the demographic characteristics in our country, the annual incidence of pMS in Tunisian children aged below 18 years could be estimated as 0.05 per 100,000. In patients aged below 15 years, it could be estimated as 0.04 per 100,000 and it increased to 0.08 per 100,000 when considering patients aged between 15 and 18 years. These findings highlight the rarity of pMS in our country [1, 3, 4] supporting the north-south gradient of MS incidence. The median age of onset of pMS symptoms in other reported studies ranges between 9.3 and 15.5 years (11 years in our patients) and the median age at diagnosis is about 16 years [1]. A very early onset as found in four of our patients (patients 3, 8, 15, and 19) has been reported [5]. Meanwhile, a very early onset calls to mind the possibility of inherited leukoencephalopathies or inborn neurometabolic disorders and practitioners should be very careful and cautious before retaining the diagnosis of MS. As shown in our study, pMS is 1.5–2 times more common in female than in male children, suggesting the hormonal pubertal influence on the onset of the disease, whereas the sex ratio is 1 when the disease begins before the age of 10 [6]. A frequent association with type 1 diabetes was found in 14% of our patients. Both MS and type 1 diabetes are considered as autoimmune disorders with different clinical manifestations. Although pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this association are still unclear, some studies suggest the implication of HLA system particularly the HLA-DRB1∗1501 allele and the deficiency of vitamin D [7, 8]. According to previous reports, 50 to 70% of patients have a polyfocal presentation as in our series with preponderance of motor dysfunction. Monofocal presentations as optic neuritis or transverse myelitis are less frequent in pMS (around 10%). ADEM-like presentation is more likely to occur in younger patients displaying polyfocal symptoms with altered behavior or consciousness, which was observed in one patient of our series. The high occurrence of paroxysmal dystonia (24%) seems to be a characteristic feature in our patients, whereas it was reported in only 2.9% of adult MS series and has unknown frequency in the pediatric population [9]. The underlying mechanisms may be related to contiguity of demyelinating lesions to basal ganglia pathways. Interestingly, dystonia was present mainly at onset and was responsive to corticosteroids ± carbamazepine. Neuroimaging features of pMS are quite similar to those in adult MS including multiple demyelinating lesions in the periventricular regions, the corpus callosum, and the spinal cord. However, brain lesions in younger children (age < 11 years) may be large and confluent with poorly defined borders at the onset of disease mimicking ADEM lesions. Infratentorial involvement noticed in 81% of our patients seems characteristic in pMS patients, suggesting the preferential immune targeting of mature myelin [1, 10]. CSF analysis, which provides information about the inflammation process, reveals normal cell count and protein level in almost 60% of cases. Increased CSF cell count less than 30 lymphocytes/mm3 may be noticed in some children with MS as reported by Sudhakar et al. [10] and as found in our patients. A higher CSF cell count is more suggestive of other diagnoses and requires exclusion of central nervous system infection, vasculitis, autoimmune systemic disorders, or neuromyelitis optica (NMO) [11]. Although OCB are not specific for inflammatory demyelination, they are useful in supporting diagnosis. Sensitivity on initial lumbar puncture varies between 35% (young children) and 68% (adolescent), which is not as high as in adult MS (90%). As reported in our study, some pMS patients who were OCB-negative at the onset become OCB-positive during follow-up [1, 3, 10]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no randomized controlled studies regarding the disease modifying therapies in pMS which intend to prevent relapses. Thus, immunomodulatory therapies are derived from adult clinical trials and small retrospective, observational studies. Interferons or glatiramer acetate is considered as the first-line therapy with proven efficacy and safety [1]. In our series, 81% of our patients underwent immunomodulatory treatment based on interferon beta with no side effects reported in all of them. A RRMS form was diagnosed in all patients of our series, which is in agreement with literature, where RRMS form is higher than 80% in the pediatric population [3, 12, 13]. After the use of modifying therapy, only one patient developed a secondary progressive form. Consistently with previous reports, a reduction in relapse rate after the initiation of first-line treatments was noticed passing from 2 relapses per year to less than 1 relapse per year. However, some children may present with refractory disease or have poor tolerance and switch to another first- or a second-line therapy as natalizumab, daclizumab, cyclophosphamide, or fingolimod but with an increased risk of side effects when the latter are used which should be balanced against potential benefits. Recent studies report that annual relapse rate seems significantly higher in pMS in comparison with adult MS (1.13 versus 0.4), which may be due to the presence of more central nervous system immune cells in the pediatric population with more intense inflammatory reaction, particularly in young children [14].

5. Conclusion

Our study illustrates pMS characteristics in Tunisia. The annual incidence of pMS in Tunisian children aged below 18 years could be estimated as 0.05 per 100,000. Our results are similar to previously reported studies regarding clinical, neuroradiological, and laboratory features which support the different characteristics of pMS compared to the adult form. However, singularity in our cohort was the frequent association with type 1 diabetes as a risk factor for MS and the increased occurrence of dystonia. The underlying mechanisms of pMS are yet to be elucidated requiring further immunobiological research. Thus, greater awareness of this demyelinating disorder may be helpful to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to improve therapeutic and management strategies of children and their families. More detailed information about demographics of Tunisia and presentation of our center.
  14 in total

Review 1.  The co-occurrence of multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes: shared aetiologic features and clinical implication for MS aetiology.

Authors:  Prudence Tettey; Steve Simpson; Bruce V Taylor; Ingrid A F van der Mei
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 2.  Treatment of multiple sclerosis in children and its challenges.

Authors:  Sona Narula; Brenda Banwell
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 3.  Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases.

Authors:  Raja Mehanna; Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 4.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis with childhood onset.

Authors:  Christel Renoux; Sandra Vukusic; Christian Confavreux
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Early onset multiple sclerosis: the role of gender.

Authors:  Mar Tintoré; Georgina Arrambide
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Clinical features and viral serologies in children with multiple sclerosis: a multinational observational study.

Authors:  Brenda Banwell; Lauren Krupp; Julia Kennedy; Raymond Tellier; Silvia Tenembaum; Jayne Ness; Anita Belman; Alexei Boiko; Olga Bykova; Emmanuelle Waubant; Jean K Mah; Cristina Stoian; Marcelo Kremenchutzky; Maria Rita Bardini; Martino Ruggieri; Mary Rensel; Jin Hahn; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; E Ann Yeh; Kevin Farrell; Mark Freedman; Matti Iivanainen; Meri Sevon; Virender Bhan; Marie-Emmanuelle Dilenge; Derek Stephens; Amit Bar-Or
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions.

Authors:  Lauren B Krupp; Marc Tardieu; Maria Pia Amato; Brenda Banwell; Tanuja Chitnis; Russell C Dale; Angelo Ghezzi; Rogier Hintzen; Andrew Kornberg; Daniela Pohl; Kevin Rostasy; Silvia Tenembaum; Evangeline Wassmer
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Paediatric acquired demyelinating syndromes: incidence, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features.

Authors:  Michael Absoud; Ming J Lim; Wui K Chong; Christian G De Goede; Katharine Foster; Roxana Gunny; Cheryl Hemingway; Philip E Jardine; Rachel Kneen; Marcus Likeman; Ken K Nischal; Michael G Pike; Naomi A Sibtain; William P Whitehouse; Carole Cummins; Evangeline Wassmer
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in the pediatric population of Sardinia, Italy.

Authors:  Silvia Dell'Avvento; Maria Alessandra Sotgiu; Salvatorica Manca; Giovanni Sotgiu; Stefano Sotgiu
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Pediatric multiple sclerosis: current concepts and consensus definitions.

Authors:  Joaquin A Pena; Timothy E Lotze
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2013-11-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving pediatric multiple sclerosis interventional phase III study design: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer S Graves; Marius Thomas; Jun Li; Anuja R Shah; Alexandra Goodyear; Markus R Lange; Heinz Schmidli; Dieter A Häring; Tim Friede; Jutta Gärtner
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.