Literature DB >> 29237784

Low Yield of FilmArray GI Panel in Hospitalized Patients with Diarrhea: an Opportunity for Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention.

Matthew M Hitchcock1, Carlos A Gomez1,2, Niaz Banaei3,2,4.   

Abstract

The FilmArray GI panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) is a multiplex, on-demand, sample-to-answer, real-time PCR assay for the syndromic diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis that has become widely adopted and, in some instances, has replaced conventional stool culture and parasite exams. Conventional testing has historically been restricted among hospitalized patients due to low diagnostic yield, but it is not known whether use of the FilmArray GI panel should be circumscribed. Cary-Blair stool samples submitted for FilmArray GI panel in adult patients admitted to an academic hospital from August 2015 to January 2017 were included in this study. Of 481 tests performed >72 h after admission, 29 (6.0%) were positive, all for a single target, excluding Clostridium difficile When follow-up tests beyond the first positive per hospitalization were excluded, 20 (4.8%) of 414 tests were positive. There was no difference in yield by immune status. Most targets detected were viral (79% of all positives [n = 23] and 70% in unique patients [n = 14]). All four cases positive for a bacterial target could not be confirmed and presentation was atypical, suggesting possible false positives. After removing potential false positives and chronic viral shedders, the yield was 3.0% (12/406). Repeat testing performed >72 h after admission and following a negative result within the first 72 h was done in 19 patients and 100% (22/22) remained negative. The FilmArray GI panel has low yield in adult patients hospitalized for >72 h, similar to conventional stool microbiology tests, and it is reasonable to restrict its use in this population.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FilmArray GI Panel; diagnostic stewardship; diarrhea; syndromic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29237784      PMCID: PMC5824048          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01558-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

Review 1.  Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: foe or innocent bystander?

Authors:  J Hu; A G Torres
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Value of routine stool cultures in hospitalized patients with diarrhea.

Authors:  F Barbut; P Leluan; G Antoniotti; A Collignon; A Sédallian; J C Petit
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Betina Hebbelstrup Jensen; Katharina E P Olsen; Carsten Struve; Karen Angeliki Krogfelt; Andreas Munk Petersen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparative evaluation of two commercial multiplex panels for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens by use of clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Reeti Khare; Mark J Espy; Elizabeth Cebelinski; David Boxrud; Lynne M Sloan; Scott A Cunningham; Bobbi S Pritt; Robin Patel; Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel for etiologic diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Sarah N Buss; Amy Leber; Kimberle Chapin; Paul D Fey; Matthew J Bankowski; Matthew K Jones; Margarita Rogatcheva; Kristen J Kanack; Kevin M Bourzac
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Is Follow-Up Testing with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal Multiplex PCR Panel Necessary?

Authors:  Sholhui Park; Matthew M Hitchcock; Carlos A Gomez; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Inappropriate testing for diarrheal diseases in the hospital.

Authors:  D L Siegel; P H Edelstein; I Nachamkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Alerting physicians during electronic order entry effectively reduces unnecessary repeat PCR testing for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Suzanne Spradley; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Application of rejection criteria for stool cultures for bacterial enteric pathogens.

Authors:  K Fan; A J Morris; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray® GastrointestinalPanel in a Midwestern Academic Hospital.

Authors:  C N Murphy; R C Fowler; P C Iwen; P D Fey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  12 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ Multiplex PCR Assay.

Authors:  Charly Roy; David Robert; Lucie Bénéjat; Alice Buissonnière; Astrid Ducournau; Francis Mégraud; Emilie Bessède; Delphine Boraud; Philippe Lehours
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Brittany A Young; Kimberly E Hanson; Carlos A Gomez
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Reproducibility of positive results for rare pathogens on the FilmArray GI Panel.

Authors:  Matthew M Hitchcock; Catherine A Hogan; Indre Budvytiene; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the new QIAstat Gastrointestinal Panel for the rapid syndromic testing of acute gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Irene Hannet; Anne Line Engsbro; Josep Pareja; Uffe Vest Schneider; Jan Gorm Lisby; Blanka Pružinec-Popović; Achim Hoerauf; Marijo Parčina
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Multiplex Molecular Stool Testing Rarely Impacts Antimicrobial Treatment Decisions More Than Three Days After Admission.

Authors:  Abdul Aleem; Gabriela Firak; Amy K Slenker
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 6.  Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Authors:  Theodore S Rader; Michael P Stevens; Gonzalo Bearman
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  The influence of hospitalization and HIV severity on gastrointestinal PCR panel evaluation of HIV-related acute diarrhea in New York City: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abhishek Verma; Ashley M Hine; Andrew Joelson; Rena Mei; Robert A Pitts; Benjamin Lebwohl; Jordan E Axelrad
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.802

8.  Alternative Causes of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients with Negative Tests for Clostridoides Difficile.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Caroline A O'Neil; Tiffany Hink; Kimberly A Reske; Rachel E Bosserman; Erik R Dubberke; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2022-03-02

9.  Use of BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal PCR panel associated with reductions in antibiotic use, time to optimal antibiotics, and length of stay.

Authors:  Daisy Torres-Miranda; Hana Akselrod; Ryan Karsner; Alessandra Secco; Diana Silva-Cantillo; Marc O Siegel; Afsoon D Roberts; Gary L Simon
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  The Perils of Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panels: Pseudo-outbreaks of Salmonellae and Entamoeba histolytica in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Authors:  Elizabeth Robilotti; Eleanor Powell; Shauna Usiak; Ying Taur; N Esther Babady; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 6.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.