Literature DB >> 29237766

The opercular mouth-opening mechanism of largemouth bass functions as a 3D four-bar linkage with three degrees of freedom.

Aaron M Olsen1, Ariel L Camp2, Elizabeth L Brainerd2.   

Abstract

The planar, one degree of freedom (1-DoF) four-bar linkage is an important model for understanding the function, performance and evolution of numerous biomechanical systems. One such system is the opercular mechanism in fishes, which is thought to function like a four-bar linkage to depress the lower jaw. While anatomical and behavioral observations suggest some form of mechanical coupling, previous attempts to model the opercular mechanism as a planar four-bar have consistently produced poor model fits relative to observed kinematics. Using newly developed, open source mechanism fitting software, we fitted multiple three-dimensional (3D) four-bar models with varying DoF to in vivo kinematics in largemouth bass to test whether the opercular mechanism functions instead as a 3D four-bar with one or more DoF. We examined link position error, link rotation error and the ratio of output to input link rotation to identify a best-fit model at two different levels of variation: for each feeding strike and across all strikes from the same individual. A 3D, 3-DoF four-bar linkage was the best-fit model for the opercular mechanism, achieving link rotational errors of less than 5%. We also found that the opercular mechanism moves with multiple degrees of freedom at the level of each strike and across multiple strikes. These results suggest that active motor control may be needed to direct the force input to the mechanism by the axial muscles and achieve a particular mouth-opening trajectory. Our results also expand the versatility of four-bar models in simulating biomechanical systems and extend their utility beyond planar or single-DoF systems.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D kinematics; Biomechanical modeling; Cranial kinesis; Joint constraints; Model complexity; XROMM

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29237766     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.159079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Channel catfish use higher coordination to capture prey than to swallow.

Authors:  Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernández; Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A physical model of mantis shrimp for exploring the dynamics of ultrafast systems.

Authors:  Emma Steinhardt; Nak-Seung P Hyun; Je-Sung Koh; Gregory Freeburn; Michelle H Rosen; Fatma Zeynep Temel; S N Patek; Robert J Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Thyroid hormone shapes craniofacial bones during postembryonic zebrafish development.

Authors:  Stephanie Keer; Joshua D Storch; Stacy Nguyen; Mia Prado; Rajendra Singh; Luz Patricia Hernandez; Sarah K McMenamin
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Strong biomechanical relationships bias the tempo and mode of morphological evolution.

Authors:  Martha M Muñoz; Y Hu; Philip S L Anderson; S N Patek
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Finding the weakest link: mechanical sensitivity in a fish cranial linkage system.

Authors:  A Baumgart; P Anderson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  High-performance suction feeding in an early elasmobranch.

Authors:  Michael I Coates; Kristen Tietjen; Aaron M Olsen; John A Finarelli
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Fish Skull and Their Relation to Hydraulic Transport of Prey in Channel Catfish.

Authors:  A M Olsen; L P Hernandez; E L Brainerd
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-11-10

8.  Adding the third dimension to studies of parallel evolution of morphology and function: An exploration based on parapatric lake-stream stickleback.

Authors:  Grant E Haines; Yoel E Stuart; Dieta Hanson; Tania Tasneem; Daniel I Bolnick; Hans C E Larsson; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Specimen alignment with limited point-based homology: 3D morphometrics of disparate bivalve shells (Mollusca: Bivalvia).

Authors:  Stewart M Edie; Katie S Collins; David Jablonski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.061

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.