Stormy weather: a retrospective analysis of demand for emergency medical services during epidemic thunderstorm asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the demand for emergency medical assistance during the largest outbreak of thunderstorm asthma reported globally, which occurred on 21 November 2016.
DESIGN: A time series analysis was conducted of emergency medical service caseload between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016. Demand during the thunderstorm asthma event was compared to historical trends for the overall population and across specific subgroups.
SETTING: Victoria, Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of overall cases attended by emergency medical services, and within patient subgroups.
RESULTS: On 21 November 2016, the emergency medical service received calls for 2954 cases, which was 1014 more cases than the average over the historical period. Between 6 pm and midnight, calls for 1326 cases were received, which was 2.5 times higher than expected. A total of 332 patients were assessed by paramedics as having acute respiratory distress on 21 November, compared with a daily average of 52 during the historical period. After adjustment for temporal trends, thunderstorm asthma was associated with a 42% (95% confidence interval 40% to 44%) increase in overall caseload for the emergency medical service and a 432% increase in emergency medical attendances for acute respiratory distress symptoms. Emergency transports to hospital increased by 17% (16% to 19%) and time critical referrals from general practitioners increased by 47% (21% to 80%). Large increases in demand were seen among patients with a history of asthma and bronchodilator use. The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increased by 82% (67% to 99%) and pre-hospital deaths by 41% (29% to 55%).
CONCLUSIONS: An unprecedented outbreak of thunderstorm asthma was associated with substantial increase in demand for emergency medical services and pre-hospital cardiac arrest. The health impact of future events may be minimised through use of preventive measures by patients and predictive early warning systems. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Introduction

Weather and climatic conditions have been associated with exacerbation of various health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, mental health and sleep disorders, and infectious diseases.1 Thunderstorm asthma is a rare phenomenon, thought to occur when a source of allergen, typically pollen, and appropriate weather conditions, such as a thunderstorm, combine to trigger severe asthma among susceptible people in the vicinity.2 Pollen grains are too large to enter the lower respiratory tract; rain is thought to cause the grains to expand and burst, discharging their allergenic contents as fine respirable particles.3 4 5 Asthma symptoms, such as coughing and wheezing, arise when sensitised patients breathe in these particles, which inflame the lining of airways.6 Thunderstorm asthma can affect patients with or without a history of asthma, but patients who experience hay fever are at increased risk.6 7 8 9

On 21 November 2016, parts of Victoria, Australia, especially the capital city of Melbourne, encountered a thunderstorm asthma health emergency. The event saw a sudden and unprecedented increase in demand on the emergency medical service and hospital emergency departments by patients with acute respiratory distress. Several epidemics of thunderstorm asthma have been reported in Australia9 10 and internationally,11 12 13 14 commonly in regions susceptible to high aeroallergen loads (table 1).8 Before the event in Victoria, the number of affected people ranged between 40 and 2000. But the scale of this event exceeded all previous reports, with approximately 13 000 presentations to hospitals in Victoria, more than 3000 of which were related to respiratory problems.29 The surge in demand for emergency medical services surpassed that of any previous event in Victoria, including the bushfires and heatwaves of 2009.27

Table 1

Previously reported thunderstorm asthma events (since 1980)*

Location	Month, year	Season	No of patients affected after thunderstorm	Duration	Expected No of patients over reported duration	Proposed allergen
Birmingham, UK15	July, 1983	Summer	106 presentations to 8 emergency departments for asthma or other respiratory disorders	48 hours	2-20 a day	Fungal spores
Melbourne, Australia16	November, 1984	Spring	85 presentations to 1 emergency department for asthma	Up to 24 hours	NR	NR
Nottingham, UK17	June, 1984	Summer	19 presentations to 1 emergency department for acute asthma	7 hours	<6 a day	Fungal spores
Melbourne, Australia10	November, 1987	Spring	154 presentations to major emergency departments for asthma	12 hours	26	NR
			22 EMS transports for asthma	12 hours	2
Melbourne, Australia10	November, 1989	Spring	277 presentations to major emergency departments for asthma	12 hours	26	Grass pollen
			44 EMS transports for asthma	12 hours	2
Tamworth, Australia18	November, 1990	Spring	110 presentations to 2 emergency departments for acute asthma	5 days	<5 a day	Grass pollen
			123 GP presentations for acute asthma	5 days	NR
London, UK19 20	June, 1994	Summer	640 emergency department presentations for asthma or airways disease	30 hours	66	Grass pollen
			536 calls for asthma to out-of-hours GP service	48 hours	135
Wagga Wagga, Australia9	October, 1997	Spring	215 presentations to a major emergency department for asthma	36 hours	NR	Grass pollen
Calgary, Canada 13	July, 2000	Summer	157 presentations to 3 emergency departments for asthma or shortness of breath	48 hours	17	Fungal spores, pollen
Cambridge, UK21	July, 2002	Summer	57 emergency department presentations or hospital admissions to 1 hospital for acute asthma	48 hours	NR	Fungal spores
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia22	November, 2002	Autumn	Spike in emergency department presentations at 1 hospital for acute asthma (exact number not specified)	Up to 24 hours	NR	NR
Melbourne, Australia23	November, 2003	Spring	70 paediatric emergency department presentations for asthma	24 hours	21	Grass pollen
Naples, Italy24	June, 2004	Summer	7 presentations to 1 emergency department for asthma	30 minutes	NR	Pollen
South East England, UK25	June, 2005	Summer	400% increase in calls to NHS Direct for “difficulty breathing” and a 50% increase in GP out-of-hours attendances	Up to 24 hours	NR	NR
Puglia, Italy26	May, 2010	Spring	20 presentations to 1 emergency department for asthma	14 hours	2-3 a day	Olive pollen
Melbourne, Australia7	November, 2010	Spring	<40 presentations to 1 tertiary emergency department	24 hours	<5	Grass pollen
London, UK11	July, 2013	Summer	40 emergency department presentations for asthma/wheeze/difficulty breathing	24 hours	15-20	NR
Ahvas, Iran14	November, 2013	Autumn	Sudden rise in emergency department presentations for acute bronchospasm attacks (exact number not specified)	NR	NR	Air pollution
Melbourne and Geelong, Australia27 28 29	November, 2016	Spring	9909 emergency department presentations to public hospitals; 2973 for respiratory problems; 476 excess asthma related hospital admissions over 30 hours	48 hours	6266 presentations; 453 for respiratory problems	Grass pollen
			313 nurse on-call calls for breathing/respiratory/allergy problems;	24 hours	63
			332 patients with paramedic assessed acute respiratory distress	24 hours	52

Includes epidemic thunderstorm asthma events reported in the scientific literature or published reports. Events reported in newspaper articles only are excluded. EMS=emergency medical service; GP=general practitioner; NR=not reported.

A previous review found several studies describing the effects of thunderstorm asthma on emergency department and primary care services.8 But limited evidence exists on the effects on the wider health system, including emergency medical services.8 To optimise the emergency medical response to future emergencies, we need to understand the direct effects of thunderstorm asthma on patients, caseloads, and associated deaths. We describe the demand on Ambulance Victoria, the state-wide emergency medical service in Victoria, Australia, during the thunderstorm asthma emergency.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a retrospective review and time series analysis of the emergency caseload in Victoria, Australia, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016. We excluded pre-booked non-emergency patient transport cases. This study was approved by Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (#7739).

Setting

The state of Victoria has a population of 6.07 million and spans almost 92 000 square miles (238 000 km2). The capital city, Melbourne, sees an average of 10 thunderstorms a year. Calls for emergency medical assistance are triaged by the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority using the Medical Priority Dispatch System. The Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority is the state government statutory authority responsible for providing multi-agency emergency service telecommunications, including taking calls and dispatching. Ambulance Victoria has two tiers, with both advanced life support and intensive care paramedics responding to medical emergencies according to a pre-defined resource allocation matrix. Firefighters with basic life support training and community volunteer teams also respond to some time critical emergencies in select areas of the state. All paramedics can give intramuscular epinephrine and ventilation with a supraglottic airway to patients with severe respiratory distress, and intensive care paramedics can perform endotracheal intubation and give intravenous epinephrine in such cases. All paramedics can give intravenous epinephrine to cases of cardiac arrest.

Ambulance Victoria also operates a referral service where low acuity emergency calls undergo secondary telephone triage by paramedics or nurses.30 This might result in emergency ambulance dispatch, referral to an alternative service (such as non-emergency transport or general practitioner), or self care advice, including advice to self present to an emergency department.

Victoria has a health emergency response plan that outlines the arrangements for coordinating the response to emergency incidents.31 On 21 November 2016 the state activated elements of the health emergency response plan and implemented escalation processes. It used several demand management strategies during the surge, including cancelling emergency ambulance dispatch to low acuity cases, cancelling pre-booked non-emergency cases, recalling staff, dispatching regional resources to metropolitan cases, dispatching first responders with basic life support training, and using police officers to conduct welfare checks. Ambulance Victoria stopped its usual secondary triage processes, and staff were used to reprioritise emergency cases. Operational paramedics were permitted to complete paper rather than electronic patient care records to make them available to respond to pending cases sooner.

Data sources and definitions

We sourced caseload data from the Ambulance Victoria data warehouse and telephony and resource allocation data from the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority. The Ambulance Victoria data warehouse also contains data from electronic patient care records that are completed by paramedics at the conclusion of every case. We extracted cases of confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry. This registry collects clinical and operational data for all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests attended by Ambulance Victoria in accordance with Utstein recommendations32 and has been described in detail elsewhere.33

We sourced weather data from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology using observations recorded at Melbourne Olympic Park (1.6 miles (2.5 km) east of city centre). We sourced air quality data from the Environment Protection Authority of Victoria, with all observations recorded at Brooklyn (6.2 miles (10 km) west of city centre), except for particulate matter smaller than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5), which was recorded at Footscray (3.1 miles (5 km) west of city centre). We sourced daily pollen counts from the School of Biosciences at the University of Melbourne. We collected pollen as previously described34 and reported it as the average concentration of grass pollen per cubic metre of air for the preceding 24 hours to 4 pm.

Cases with multiple emergency phone calls were counted as a single case. Patients with a paramedic assessment of acute respiratory distress included those with asthma or shortness of breath. We coded pre-existing conditions into a history of asthma or other respiratory conditions, including chronic bronchitis, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary oedema, croup, apnoea, and bronchiectasis. We categorised asthma preventer and bronchodilator drugs according to the National Asthma Council of Australia guidelines.35

Statistical analyses

Baseline characteristics are presented as frequencies and proportions, mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. We estimated the 99th centile of cases over the two year study period using linear interpolation. We compared groups using the χ2, Fischer’s exact, t test, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. We compared the baseline characteristics of patients seen by Ambulance Victoria during the thunderstorm asthma event (6 pm to 11 59 pm on 21 November 2016) with those seen during the same hours on the three previous consecutive Mondays.

To investigate the effect of thunderstorm asthma on daily caseload of Ambulance Victoria after adjustment for temporal trends, we used negative binomial time series regression analyses with distributed lags. We included all cases occurring between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016. Results are presented as incident rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Models were adjusted for day of week, month, and long term trend. The thunderstorm asthma event was included in the model as a dichotomous term, with the entire day of 21 November 2016 defined as the thunderstorm asthma period. We included three lag days in models to assess residual effects. We calculated the cumulative effect of thunderstorm asthma as the sum of the effect on the day of the event and the three lag days. We conducted time series analyses across patient subgroups and local government areas. We conducted a sensitivity analyses in which all emergency ambulance attendances during the thunderstorm asthma period with missing patient data were assumed to involve respiratory distress (n=250).

We performed all analyses using Stata 14 software (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX). We considered two sided P values less than 0.05 to be statistically significant.

Patient involvement

No patients were involved in setting the research question or outcomes measures, nor were they involved in developing plans for design or implementation of the study. No patients were asked to give advice on interpretation or writing up of results.

Results

Weather and aerobiology

21 November 2016 was Melbourne’s hottest spring day with a maximum temperature of 35°C. Gusty northerly winds resulted in a reading of 102 grass pollen grains/m3 of air for the 24 hours to 4 pm. This meant the pollen count was classified as extreme (≥100 grains/m3), with susceptible people having a high risk of severe allergic rhinitis.36

A north-south line of thunderstorms developed west of Melbourne in the mid-afternoon and produced severe westerly wind gusts of 37 mph (60 km/h) or more. The line of storms moved eastwards across Melbourne between 5 pm and 6 30 pm. The storm passage was marked by a sharp drop in temperature, an increase in relative humidity, and a rapid change in wind direction from northerly to westerly (fig 1). The change in wind direction led to a rise in PM10 in the air, peaking at 191 μg/m3. Rainfall up to 1-4 mm was recorded across Melbourne after the wind change, and the levels of grass pollen and PM10 in the air both fell as winds eased during the evening from light west to south westerly. The average daily grass pollen reading for Melbourne on 22 November was classified as low (19 grains/m3). Grass pollen levels remained low (<20 grains/m3) over the next few days.

Fig 1

Hourly emergency medical service caseload and weather patterns. Vertical black line shows the onset of the thunderstorm. PM=particulate matter; mph=miles per hour.

Hourly caseload

Figure 1 shows the hourly emergency caseload, with a sharp increase in caseload after the storm and wind change. Between 7 pm and 8 pm, the caseload reached 297 cases, corresponding to 2.43 times the 99th centile caseload of the two year study period (122 cases). Between 6 pm and midnight, emergency services received calls for 1326 cases. As such, the caseload was 2.50 times the average (530 cases), equating to almost 800 additional cases. The caseload was so extreme that no ambulance could be dispatched to more than 500 cases; these were closed through paramedic telephone assessment. The caseload fell back down to 65 cases between 7 am and 8 am the next day, which was under the 99th centile of the comparator period (77 cases).

Patient characteristics

The characteristics of patients attended by an emergency ambulance between 6 pm and midnight on 21 November were compared with patients seen during the same hours on the three previous Mondays (table 2). Only patients with an electronic patient care record were included (thunderstorm asthma period: 82.3% (615 of 747) of emergency attendances; comparator period: 92.8% (1111 of 1197)). Patients seen in the thunderstorm asthma period were significantly younger than in the comparator period. Almost half of all patients reported a history of asthma, but 26.4% (156 of 590) and 1.4% (8 of 590) were recorded as taking only an asthma bronchodilator or preventive medication, respectively. Almost half of the patients seen in the thunderstorm asthma period had acute respiratory distress when assessed by paramedics.

Table 2

Characteristics of patients attended by an emergency ambulance between 6 pm and midnight on Mondays

	Thunderstorm asthma period(n=615)	Comparator period (n=1111)	P value	Risk ratio (95% CI)
Age (years), mean (SD)	45.1 (22.9)	50.4 (26.1)	<0.001	-
Age (years), n (%):
0-14	54 (8.9)	84 (7.6)	0.4	1.16 (0.84 to 1.61)
15-30	117 (19.2)	227 (20.7)	0.5	0.93 (0.76 to 1.14)
31-50	215 (35.3)	250 (22.8)	<0.001	1.55 (1.33 to 1.81)
51-70	128 (21.0)	237 (21.6)	0.8	0.97 (0.81 to 1.18)
≥71	95 (15.6)	301 (27.4)	<0.001	0.57 (0.46 to 0.70)
Missing	6	12	-	-
Male gender, n (%)	328 (53.4)	539 (48.7)	0.06	1.10 (1.00 to 1.21)
Missing	1	3	-	-
Pre-existing medical conditions, n (%):
Asthma	228 (37.4)	119 (11.0)	<0.001	3.41 (2.80 to 4.16)
Other respiratory	39 (6.4)	93 (8.6	0.1	0.75 (0.52 to 1.07)
Missing	5	24	-	-
Current asthma medications, n (%):
Preventer	8 (1.4)	35 (3.4)	0.02	0.41 (0.19 to 0.87)
Bronchodilator	156 (26.4)	95 (9.1)	<0.001	2.91 (2.30 to 3.68)
Both	65 (11.0)	63 (6.0)	<0.001	1.83 (1.31 to 2.55)
Missing	25	65	-	-
Breathing problems identified in emergency phone call, n (%)	345 (56.1)	125 (11.3)	<0.001	4.99 (4.17 to 5.97)
Dispatch priority, n (%):
Time critical	527 (85.7)	550 (49.5)	<0.001	1.73 (1.62 to 1.85)
Acute but not time critical	66 (10.7)	442 (39.8)	<0.001	0.27 (0.21 to 0.34)
Non-acute	22 (3.6)	119 (10.7)	<0.001	0.33 (0.21 to 0.52)
Response time (mins), median (interquartile range):
Time critical	16.7 (11.1 to 26.9)	11.2 (8.6 to 16.9)	<0.001	-
Acute but not time critical	25.0 (13.0 to 42.3)	23.6 (15.9 to 36.7)	0.99	-
Non-acute	42.9 (30.4 to 61.0)	39.2 (22.4 to 68.4)	0.7	-
Paramedic assessed acute respiratory distress, n (%)	291 (47.3)	43 (3.9)	<0.001	12.2 (9.0 to 16.6)
Transported to hospital, n (%)	448 (72.8)	873 (78.6)	0.007	0.93 (0.88 to 0.98)

Thunderstorm asthma period comprised 6 pm to11 59 pm on 21 November 2016; comparator period comprised 6 pm to 11 59 pm on the three Mondays before. Proportions exclude missing data. CI=confidence interval; SD=standard deviation.

Seventeen out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were recorded during the event (supplementary table S1). More than half of these (n=9) were presumed to have a respiratory cause (52.9%), compared with none of the 15 recorded in the comparator period (P<0.001). Eight (47.1%) patients had a history of asthma, compared with three (20%) in the comparator period. See supplementary table S2 for the characteristics of patients with a paramedic assessment of acute respiratory distress.

Effects of thunderstorm asthma on emergency services

The emergency medical service handled 2954 cases on 21 November and 2493 cases the next day, compared with an average of 1940 cases over the comparator period (fig 2). After adjusting for temporal tends, thunderstorm asthma was associated with a 41.7% (95% confidence interval 39.6% to 43.9%) increase in caseload on 21 November (supplementary figure S1). The cumulative effect of the event, accounting for three additional lag days, was an increase in caseload of 96.6% (86.3% to 107.4%). Emergency transports to hospital on 21 November rose by 17.3% (15.6% to 19.1%), and time critical referrals from general practitioners rose by 47.1% (20.5% to 79.6%).

Fig 2

Daily emergency medical service caseload across the two year study period

On 21 November, emergency services received calls for 774 cases with breathing problems, and 332 cases had acute respiratory distress on paramedic assessment (supplementary figure S2). After adjustment, thunderstorm asthma was associated with a 337.2% (313.3% to 362.5%) increase in calls for breathing problems (supplementary figure S3A) and a 432.3% (398.4% to 468.5%) rise in patients with acute respiratory distress (supplementary figure S3B). In a sensitivity analysis accounting for missing data, we found that the increase in acute respiratory distress could have been as high as 644.0% (596.7% to 694.6%).

Effect of thunderstorm asthma on patient subgroups

As previously, only patients with an electronic patient care record were included. After adjustment, thunderstorm asthma was associated with a 149.1% (137.1% to 161.8%) increase in presentations by patients with pre-existing asthma (table 3). We found a 103.1% (95.9% to 110.5%) increase in patients using a bronchodilator, compared with 21.3% (14.2% to 28.8%) in patients using preventive medication. Thunderstorm asthma was associated with an 82.2% (67.1% to 98.8%) rise in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and a 41.4% (28.7% to 55.5%) rise in pre-hospital deaths.

Table 3

Adjusted immediate and cumulative effect of thunderstorm asthma on subgroups of patients attended by an emergency ambulance

	Immediate effect, IRR (95% CI)	P value		Cumulative effect, IRR (95% CI)	P value
Age (years):
0-14	1.12 (1.07 to 1.17)	<0.001		3.11 (2.64 to 3.65)	<0.001
15-30	1.46 (1.40 to 1.52)	<0.001		2.60 (2.24 to 3.03)	<0.001
31-50	1.39 (1.36 to 1.42)	<0.001		1.91 (1.76 to 2.07)	<0.001
51-70	1.19 (1.16 to 1.22)	<0.001		1.03 (0.94 to 1.11)	0.6
≥71	1.03 (1.01 to 1.05)	0.009		0.97 (0.90 to 1.04)	0.4
Gender:
Male	1.26 (1.24 to 1.29)	<0.001		1.39 (1.29 to 1.50)	<0.001
Female	1.15 (1.13 to 1.18)	<0.001		1.61 (1.49 to 1.74)	<0.001
Current asthma medications:
Preventer	1.21 (1.14 to 1.29)	<0.001		1.68 (1.38 to 2.05)	<0.001
Bronchodilator	2.03 (1.96 to 2.11)	<0.001		9.39 (8.24 to 10.7)	<0.001
Both	1.62 (1.54 to 1.71)	<0.001		2.84 (2.35 to 3.42)	<0.001
Pre-existing medical conditions:
Asthma	2.49 (2.37 to 2.62)	<0.001		11.1 (9.22 to 13.4)	<0.001
Other respiratory	1.21 (1.17 to 1.26)	<0.001		1.89 (1.64 to 2.17)	<0.001
Time critical referral from general practitioner	1.47 (1.21 to 1.80)	<0.001		0.33 (0.16 to 0.67)	0.002
Paramedic assessed acute respiratory distress	5.32 (4.98 to 5.68)	<0.001		70.5 (55.2 to 90.1)	<0.001
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest	1.82 (1.67 to 1.99)	<0.001		1.98 (1.45 to 2.70)	<0.001
Pre-hospital death	1.41 (1.29 to 1.55)	<0.001		1.56 (1.11 to 2.20)	<0.001
Transported to hospital	1.17 (1.16 to 1.19)	<0.001		1.31 (1.23 to 1.39)	<0.001

Immediate effect is the day of the event. Cumulative effect includes three lag days. IRR=incident rate ratio; CI=confidence interval.

Regional variation in the effects of thunderstorm asthma

We found the highest increases in workload in local government areas to the west and north of Melbourne (supplementary figure S4). But we found increases in demand across Melbourne and surrounding areas (>4600 square miles (12 000 km2), showing the broad geographical profile of the event.

Discussion

We describe the impact on emergency services of the world’s largest recorded and most severe thunderstorm asthma health emergency. The event was associated with a 41.7% increase in emergency service caseload and a dramatic increase in cases of acute respiratory distress.

Although some previous studies have described the influence of thunderstorm asthma on health services such as primary care facilities and emergency departments,7 10 11 12 13 37 none have examined emergency medical services. These services are recommended as the first point of call for patients with out-of-hospital health emergencies, and understanding their use and the characteristics of patients presenting during such events can assist health planning. We found a 2.5-fold increase in demand for emergency medical services between 6 pm and midnight on the day of the event. This finding supports previous reports in which thunderstorm asthma has been associated with large and sudden spikes in emergency department and general practice presentations.7 8 12 20

Such unprecedented increases in demand place enormous strain on health services.8 In Victoria, the emergency medical services implemented a range of demand management strategies after the sudden surge was identified. But the extent, severity, and duration of this event surpassed all expectations. The current state health emergency response plan was drafted for events such as bushfires, heatwaves, and mass casualty events. It was unlikely to be effective for a complex emergency such as thunderstorm asthma, given its broad geographical spread and rapid onset.27 Warning of this event may have enabled earlier implementation of demand management strategies, facilitating a more streamlined emergency response and a reduction in the event’s wider health impact.

The health impact might also have been reduced through use of preventive measures by patients; this could be achieved through increased future awareness of thunderstorm asthma. For example, thunderstorm asthma commonly occurs in spring, and review of patient asthma action plans by general practitioners in the lead-up to this season may reduce the impact of thunderstorm asthma.28 Additionally, given the allergenic nature of the fine respirable particles, prescription of epinephrine injectors for susceptible patients may warrant consideration.

We identified subgroups of patients with the largest increases in demand of emergency services. Our findings support previous studies, which have found increases in emergency department demand by children and young to middle aged adults.12 23 Our study, however, found that the effect of thunderstorm asthma was delayed in children younger than 15 years. Similarly, our findings support the notion that preventive medication, such as corticosteroids, may be effective in preventing severe asthma attacks related to thunderstorm asthma if taken before the event.6 9 12 We found that demand by patients taking preventive medication increased by only 21.3% on 21 November, compared with a 103.1% increase among patients taking asthma bronchodilators only. The cumulative demand for emergency medical services among patients taking an asthma bronchodilator alone (incident rate ratio 9.39) was more than five times that of patients taking an asthma preventer (incident rate ratio 1.68).

Finally, we observed a near doubling in cardiac arrests on the day of the event, with the majority reported to be due to a respiratory cause. Ten deaths have been attributed to thunderstorm asthma.27 We are not aware of such increases in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after previous thunderstorm asthma events, although increases in outdoor air pollution in our region have been associated with an increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.38 The concentration of coarse particles in the air during the thunderstorm asthma event in Victoria was more than double the Australian Environment Protection Measure (Ambient Air Quality) concentration of 80 μg/m3. The concentration of fine particles, however, was only slightly increased. While increasing concentrations of fine particles have been well documented to increase the risk of premature death,39 40 the influence of coarse particles and aeroallergens on cardiovascular health remains less clear.39 41 Our study indicates that the influence of coarse particles on cardiovascular and respiratory health warrants further investigation.

Limitations

Our study was retrospective. The capture of patient medications and pre-existing medical conditions was dependent on this information being entered into patient care records and may be under-reported. Hay fever was not routinely recorded, and we were unable to determine the presence or absence of pollen allergy. Because of the high demand for emergency medical services, only 82.3% of cases had an electronic patient care record available, and numbers for subgroup analyses may be under-reported. Although we were able to report paramedic assessment of acute respiratory distress, we were unable to confirm the hospital diagnosis that these patients received. We did not obtain data related to fungal spore counts in the air. Finally, we used environment data from central air quality, pollen, and weather monitoring stations, but patient exposure may have differed across Victoria. Nevertheless, our study is strengthened by the large historical sample size over a two year period.

Conclusion

An unprecedented thunderstorm asthma event in Victoria was associated with a sudden surge in demand for emergency medical services from patients with severe respiratory distress and those with a history of asthma. Importantly, those using preventive asthma medications were less likely to be affected than those taking a bronchodilator alone. Predictive early warning systems may help to ensure that susceptible people are alerted about future emergencies and to minimise the health impact.

What is already known on this subject

Thunderstorm asthma is a rare phenomenon whereby a surge in patients with acute respiratory illness occurs after a thunderstorm.

It increases pressure on health services such as primary care facilities and emergency departments.

What this study adds

We found that the largest globally reported outbreak of thunderstorm asthma was associated with a 42% increase in the overall caseload of emergency medical services and a 432% increase in emergency attendances for acute respiratory distress symptoms after adjustment for temporal trends.

Demand management strategies were insufficient to manage such a widespread and rapid onset event, with ambulance resources quickly depleted.

The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and pre-hospital deaths increased by 82% and 41%, respectively.