| Literature DB >> 29237235 |
Long-Bin Jeng1, Sung Gyu Lee2, Arvinder Singh Soin3, Wei-Chen Lee4, Kyung-Suk Suh5, Dong Jin Joo6, Shinji Uemoto7, Jaewon Joh8, Tomoharu Yoshizumi9, Horng-Ren Yang1, Gi-Won Song2, Patricia Lopez10, Jossy Kochuparampil10, Carole Sips10, Shuhei Kaneko11, Gary Levy12.
Abstract
In a multicenter, open-label, study, 284 living-donor liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 ± 5 days posttransplant to start everolimus+reduced tacrolimus (EVR+rTAC) or continue standard tacrolimus (TAC Control). EVR+rTAC was non-inferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint of treated BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplant: difference -0.7% (90% CI -5.2%, 3.7%); P < .001 for non-inferiority. Treated BPAR occurred in 2.2% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. The key secondary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, achieved non-inferiority (P < .001 for non-inferiority), but not superiority and was similar between groups overall (mean -8.0 vs. -12.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = .108), and in patients continuing randomized treatment (-8.0 vs. -13.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = .046). In the EVR+rTAC and TAC control groups, study drug was discontinued in 15.5% and 17.6% of patients, adverse events with suspected relation to study drug occurred in 57.0% and 40.4%, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in 9.3% and 0%, respectively. Everolimus did not negatively affect liver regeneration. At 12 months, hepatocellular recurrence was only seen in the standard TAC-treated patients (5/62; 8.1%). In conclusion, early introduction of EVR+rTAC was non-inferior to standard tacrolimus in terms of efficacy and renal function at 12 months, with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence only in TAC Control patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01888432.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research/practice; immunosuppressant - mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR); immunosuppression/immune modulation; lung (allograft) function/dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29237235 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086