Literature DB >> 29237189

[Management of penile cancer patients: new aspects of a rare tumour entity].

M Roiner1, O Maurer1, S Lebentrau2, C Gilfrich1, C Schäfer3, C Haberl4, S D Brookman-May5, M Burger6, M May1, O W Hakenberg7.   

Abstract

Over the past few decades, some principles in the treatment of penile cancer have changed fundamentally. While 15 years ago a negative surgical margin of at least 2 cm was considered mandatory, organ-sparing surgery permitting minimal negative surgical margins has a high priority nowadays. The current treatment principle requires as much organ preservation as possible and as much radicality as necessary. The implementation of organ-sparing and reconstructive surgical techniques has improved the quality of life of surviving patients. However, oncological and functional outcomes are still unsatisfactory. Alongside with adequate local treatment of the primary tumour, a consistent management of inguinal lymph nodes is of fundamental prognostic significance. In particular, clinically inconspicuous inguinal lymph nodes staged T1b and upwards need a surgical approach. Sentinel node biopsy, minimally-invasive surgical techniques and modified inguinal lymphadenectomy have reduced morbidity compared to conventional inguinal lymph node dissection. Multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy is required in all patients with lymph node-positive disease; neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established for patients with locally advanced lymph node disease, and adjuvant treatment after radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for lymph node-positive disease. An increasing understanding of the underlying tumour biology, in particular the role of the human papilloma virus (HPV) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, has led to a new pathological classification and may further enhance treatment options. This review summarises current aspects in the therapeutic management of penile cancer. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29237189     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aktuelle Urol        ISSN: 0001-7868            Impact factor:   0.658


  4 in total

1.  Why is the principle of "as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible" only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Authors:  Matthias May; Michael Rink; Axel S Merseburger; Sabine D Brookman-May
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-10

Review 2.  [Conventional grading vs. molecular grading : Decision aids for clinical routine].

Authors:  C Kakies; D Louise Dräger; P Spiess; O W Hakenberg; C Protzel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Molecular characterization of penile cancer : Literature review of new prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets].

Authors:  M May; S D Brookman-May; T H Ecke; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Quality of care criteria in the treatment of penile cancer].

Authors:  A Thomas; F Kölling; A Haferkamp; I Tsaur
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 0.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.