Literature DB >> 2923686

Posterior nasal packing. Are intravenous antibiotics really necessary?

C S Derkay1, B E Hirsch, J T Johnson, R L Wagner.   

Abstract

The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the presence of posterior nasal packing for the treatment of posterior epistaxis remains controversial. Twenty patients were prospectively randomized into this placebo-controlled, double-masked pilot study to receive either placebo or cefazolin sodium. Antibiotic-impregnated posterior gauze packing was employed in all patients. No infectious complications were noted in either group. The packings from the patients in the placebo group were foul smelling and heavily colonized with gram-negative bacteria while the packings from the antibiotic group were odor-free and lightly colonized with gram-positive organisms. This preliminary study suggests the usefulness of antimicrobial prophylaxis for preventing complications from posterior nasal packing, although a larger sample size will be needed to decrease the type II (beta) error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2923686     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860280037013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  2 in total

1.  Nasal packing and stenting.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

2.  Should prophylactic antibiotics be used routinely in epistaxis patients with nasal packs?

Authors:  T C Biggs; K Nightingale; N N Patel; R J Salib
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.