Literature DB >> 29236241

Set organic pollution as an impact category to achieve more comprehensive evaluation of life cycle assessment in wastewater-related issues.

Xinyue Zhao1,2, Jixian Yang1, Fang Ma3.   

Abstract

For wastewater-related issues (WRI), life cycle assessment (LCA) is often used to evaluate environmental impacts and derive optimization strategies. To promote the application of LCA for WRI, it is critical to incorporate local impact of water pollutants. Organic pollution, a main type of water pollution, has not been given much consideration in current LCA systems. This paper investigates the necessity of setting a regionalized impact category to reflect the local impact of organic pollution. A case study is conducted concerning an upgraded wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in China, which is assumed to meet different sewage control strategies. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) is selected to represent the organic pollution and treated as an individual impact category. CML 2002 is used to quantify the environmental impacts of different strategies. Results show that abnormal LCA results are generated with the traditional eutrophication impact category, and after the introduction of COD, more reasonable LCA results are obtained, making the entire comparison of different control strategies more meaningful and compelling. Moreover, BEES, Ecovalue 08, and Chinese factors are adopted here as different weighting methods. Different weighting results exhibited various trade-offs for the increasingly strict control strategies; the results of BEES and Ecovalue08 underlined the potential environmental burden, but the results of Chinese factors only emphasized the local environmental improvement. It is concluded that setting regionalized impact category for organic pollution can make LCA results more reasonable in wastewater treatment, especially in evaluating Chinese cases because of the serious water pollution caused by large quantities of COD emission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical oxygen demand; Life cycle assessment; Wastewater treatment; Weighting method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29236241     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0895-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

Review 1.  Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art.

Authors:  Ll Corominas; J Foley; J S Guest; A Hospido; H F Larsen; S Morera; A Shaw
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Jorgelina C Pasqualino; Montse Meneses; Montserrat Abella; Francesc Castells
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Performance and life cycle environmental benefits of recycling spent ion exchange brines by catalytic treatment of nitrate.

Authors:  Jong Kwon Choe; Allison M Bergquist; Sangjo Jeong; Jeremy S Guest; Charles J Werth; Timothy J Strathmann
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Evaluation of bioaugmentation using multiple life cycle assessment approaches: A case study of constructed wetland.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhao; Jixian Yang; Xuedong Zhang; Li Wang; Fang Ma
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 5.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Stefanie Hellweg; Llorenç Milà i Canals
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000.

Authors:  Anneke Wegener Sleeswijk; Lauran F C M van Oers; Jeroen B Guinée; Jaap Struijs; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 7.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.