| Literature DB >> 29235531 |
Xiaohui Xu1,2, Xiaoqiang Li3, Gangyi Yang2, Ling Li4, Wenjing Hu5, Lili Zhang2, Hua Liu6, Hongting Zheng7, Minghong Tan8, Danping Zhu9.
Abstract
Our objective is to determine circulating Bone morphogenetic protein-9(BMP-9) levels in subjects with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and examine the relationship between BMP-9 and conventional markers for MetS and insulin resistance (IR). A total of 362 newly diagnosed patients with MetS along with healthy controls were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Circulating BMP-9 levels were measured by ELISA. Circulating BMP-9 levels were significantly lower in MetS patients compared to those of the healthy controls. BMP-9 was associated negatively with Waist hip ratio (WHR), fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour blood glucose after glucose overload (2h-OGTT), HbA1c, triglyceride (TG) levels and HOMA-IR and positively with free fatty acid (FFA) and HDL after control for age and sex. In a multiple linear regression, BMP-9 was independently associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), HOMA-IR and FFA. Binary logistic regression showed that plasma BMP-9 concentrations were significantly associated with MetS even after controlling for anthropometric variables and lipid profiles. In addition, circulating BMP-9 levels reduced progressively with an increasing number of MetS components. The best cutoff values for circulating BMP-9 to predict MetS was 56.6 ng/L. Circulating BMP-9 levels were associated with the key components of MetS and IR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29235531 PMCID: PMC5727514 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17807-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Main clinical features in MetS and control subjects.
| Variable | Controls (n = 147) | MetS (n = 215) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 53.8 ± 9.2 | 54.6 ± 8.2 | 0.124 |
| Sex (femal %) | 59.9% (88, 59) | 54.4% (117, 98) | 0.332 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.9 ± 3.0 | 25.4 ± 2.6 | <0.001 |
| FAT (%) | 26.3 ± 5.9 | 31.3 ± 7.0 | <0.001 |
| WHR | 0.87 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.06 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 116.8 ± 15.0 | 131.8 ± 18.6 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.5 ± 9.6 | 82.6 ± 12.1 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.59 ± 1.03 | 4.90 ± 1.35 | 0.021 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.15 (0.80–1.50) | 2.00 (1.40–2.70) | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.40 ± 0.60 | 1.10 ± 0.25 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.67 ± 0.76 | 2.90 ± 0.98 | 0.015 |
| FFA (µmol/L) | 0.51 (0.38–0.65) | 0.64 (0.44–0.90) | <0.001 |
| HBA1c (%) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 1.9 | <0.001 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 7.8 ± 4.0 | <0.001 |
| 2h-BG (mmol/L) | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 13.2 ± 8.2 | <0.001 |
| FIns (mU/L) | 8.6 (5.6–13.0)(143) | 15.8 (9.5–22.7)(174) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.97 (1.30–3.02)(143) | 5.04 (3.66–6.75)(174) | <0.001 |
BMI, Body mass index; FAT (%), the percentage of fat in vivo; WHR, Waist hip ratio; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; TG, Triglyceride; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, High- density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acid; HbA1c, Glycosylated hemoglobin; FBG, Fasting blood glucose; 2h-BG, 2 h post-glucose load blood glucose; FIns, Fasting plasma insulin; HOMA-IR, HOMA-insulin resistance index. Values are means ± SD or median (interquartile Range).
Plasma BMP-9 levels according to gender and various clinical phenotypes.
| Clinical phenotype | n | BMP-9 (ng/L) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 205 | 54.75(34.76,88.38) | |
| Male | 157 | 51.38(31.20,97.13) | 0.789 |
| Central obesity | 237 | 50.93(32.01,83.48) | |
| Non-central obesity | 125 | 61.58(38.71,102.31) | <0.05 |
| Dyslipidemia | 270 | 49.73(32.11,84.29) | |
| Normal lipid | 92 | 75.72(45.93,109.00) | <0.001 |
| IR | 143 | 49.17(32.27,82.57) | |
| Non-IR | 174 | 68.48(43.94,114.51) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 193 | 49.72(31.20,81.25) | |
| Normal BP | 169 | 59.75(35.19,110.75) | <0.001 |
| MetS | 215 | 44.31(29.77,66.39) | |
| Non-MetS | 147 | 78.39(47.78,140.29) | <0.001 |
IR, insulin resistance; BP, blood pressure. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Figure 1(A) Circulating BMP-9 levels in control and MetS individuals. (B) Circulating BMP-9 levels in relation to the number of MetS components. The values of BMP-9 are log-transformed. (C) Prevalence of elevated MetS in different quartiles f BMP-9: tertile 1, ≤ 39.49 ng/L; tertile 2, 39.49–75.93 ng/L; tertile 3, > 75.93 ng/L (*P < 0.01 vs. controls or tertile 1).
The correlation analysis of plasma BMP-9 levels with other variables in study subjects.
| Variable |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | −0.082 | 0.125 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.047 | 0.378 |
| WHR | −0.145 | <0.001 |
| FAT (%) | −0.099 | 0.062 |
| SBP (mmHg) | −0.017 | 0.745 |
| DBP (mmHg) | −0.024 | 0.649 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | −0.154 | <0.001 |
| 2h-OGTT (mmol/L) | −0.232 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | −0.161 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L)a | −0.116 | 0.031 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.016 | 0.767 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L)a | 0.188 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.034 | 0.538 |
| FFA (µmol/L) | 0.189 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IRa | −0.150 | <0.001 |
| FIns (mU/L) | −0.024 | 0.666 |
In pearson correlation analysis, values included for analysis were age, BMI, WHR, BP, FBG, insulin, HOMA-IR, FFA, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride. alog-transformed values.
Multiple stepwise regression showing variables with significant independent associations with plasma BMP-9.
| Coefficient β | 95%CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −0.013 | 0.826 | |
| Sex | 0.143 | 0.886 | |
| FFA | 0.160 | 0.029–0.291 | <0.01 |
| Central obesity | −0.020 | 0.853 | |
| Dyslipidemia | −0.049 | 0.842 | |
| T2DM | −0.294 | −0.497–(−0.090) | <0.01 |
| HOMA-IR | −0.296 | −0.496–(−0.105) | <0.01 |
BMP-9 was log-transformed before analysis.
Association of circulating BMP-9 levels with MetS in fully adjusted models.
| Model adjust | MetS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI |
| ||
| Age, Sex | 0.529 | 0.393–0.711 | <0.001 | |
| Age, Sex, BMI, WHR, FAT (%) | 0.497 | 0.3543–0.699 | <0.001 | |
| Age, Sex, BMI, WHR, FAT (%), SBP, DBP | 0.432 | 0.295–0.632 | <0.001 | |
| Age, Sex, BP, BMI, WHR, FAT(%), lipid profile | 0.361 | 0.224–0.582 | <0.001 | |
Results of binary logistic regression analysis are presented as the odds ratio (OR) of being in MetS status decrease in circulating. BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip; FAT (%), the percentage of fat in vivo; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; lipid profile, including total cholesterol, FFA, triglyceride, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol.
Row mean scores and Cochran–Armitage trend test of the impact of plasma BMP-9 level on MetS
| Model adjusted | MetS | |
|---|---|---|
| χ2 |
| |
| Row Mean Scores Test | 12.2353 | <0.001 |
| Cochran-Armitage Trend Test | 12.1915 | <0.001 |
The circulating BMP-9 levels of all subjects were cut-off and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, WHR, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C.
Figure 2ROC curve analysis was performed for the prediction of MetS (A) and dyslipidemia (B).