| Literature DB >> 29235491 |
Wenchao Ma1, Terrence Wenga2, Nan Zhang3, Guanyi Chen4,5, Beibei Yan2, Zhihua Zhou2, Xiao Wu6.
Abstract
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration is widely adopted as a waste management strategy and for the energy production. However, this technology experience grave deposition and corrosion of the boiler tubes due to high chlorine (~1.09wt.%) and alkali metal (Na, K) content in MSW. Little is known about the concentration profile of these corrosive elements in the deposits at different boiler locations. Therefore, a full-scale experimental investigation was conducted to determine the concentration profile of Cl, K, Na, S, and Ca in the deposits at pre-protector and compare with those at 3rd superheater during MSW combustion at a 36 MWe waste incineration plant (WIP) in Chengdu, China. The deposit samples were analyzed using wet chemical techniques, scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The concentrations of Na, K, and Cl were high in the deposits at pre-protector while S and Ca concentrations were high on the 3rd superheater. The pre-protector was severely corroded than the 3rd superheater. The governing mechanisms for the deposition and corrosion on these boiler locations were elucidated.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29235491 PMCID: PMC5727521 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17438-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Ash deposits on (a) pre-protector and (b) 3rd superheater.
Figure 2SEM images of deposits on (a) pre-protector and (b) 3rd superheater.
Figure 3SEM micrograph of deposits on pre-protector in terms of growth.
Figure 4Elemental analysis of ash deposits on pre-protector and 3rd superheater.
Elemental analysis of deposits of pre-protector in terms of growth.
| Position | Major element |
|---|---|
| Outer | Cl (7.82%), Ca (8.13%), Si (2.25%), Al (3.29%), S (10.5%) |
| Inner | Ca (6.32%), Cl (5.58%), Na (5.89%), S (10.01%), Si (4.35%), K (4.93%) |
| Interface | Na (7.54%), S (14.63%), K (6.15%), Cl (1.36%) |
Figure 5Elemental composition of deposits from pre-protector and 3rd superheater by wet chemical analysis.
Figure 6XRD results of deposits from 3rd superheater and pre-protector.
Figure 7SEM micrograph of (a) pre-protector’s surface and (b) cross-sectional area.
Figure 8SEM micrograph of (a) 3rd superheater’s surface and (b) cross-sectional area.
Proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of waste in Chengdu (wt.%).
| Proximate analysis (wt.%) | LHV (kJ/kg) | Ultimate analysis (wt.%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | Volatile* | Ash | C | H | O* | N | S | Cl | |
| 41.76 | 42.19 | 16.05 | 6280 | 42.38 | 7.17 | 47.16 | 2.13 | 0.07 | 1.09 |
*By difference.
LHV-Lower heating value.
Specifications and operating parameters of the Unit 1 boiler.
| Nominal capacity | Nominal electricity production | Primary air flow | Secondary air flow | Steam temperature | Steam pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 Tons/day | 12 MWe | 30~35 × 103 Nm3/h | 6~8 × 103 Nm3/h | 400 °C | 4 MPa |
Figure 9Schematic diagram of the WIP in Chengdu.